I am saying that the corruption is what is behind much of the problems Jews face and it is not just plain antisemitism from people who hate./ That distinction is useful, and it is only partly right.A lot of what Jews run into in schools, universities, city halls, and party machines is not a mob that woke up hating Jews. It is selective enforcement: officials protect the coalition they need and go soft on the coalition they fear. That is corruption of standards—careerism, donor and activist capture, ideological capture—not always personal Jew-hatred. The same machinery can ignore other groups when they are inconvenient. Your earlier request not to make this “only a Jewish issue” still applies.Where the corruption story is strong:Administrators treat one community’s safety as urgent and another’s as “complicated” because of who votes, who protests, who staffs DEI offices, and who will call them racist. Faculty and unions treat Israel/Jews through an oppressor script, then call enforcement “censorship.” That is ideology plus institutional self-protection. Politicians use Jews or Israel as a factional football—over-protect, under-protect, or talk in code—depending on the primary electorate. Stock-trading and pay-to-play are a different corruption: self-dealing. They rot trust in government generally. They are not the main engine of campus harassment. Conflating every failure with “Congress trades stocks” flattens the problem. Where “it’s just corruption, not antisemitism” is too clean:People still assault Jews, vandalize synagogues, and treat “Jew” and “Zionist” as the same target with no policy memo required. That is hatred, not a procurement scandal. Corruption often uses antisemitic ideas because they are already available: dual loyalty, hidden power, collective guilt. Capture explains the unequal response. It does not invent every slur or every blocked doorway. So the accurate split is:Animus — people who target Jews for existing. Corrupt or captured institutions — people who do not hate Jews personally but will not apply the same rule when the source of harm is their side. Ordinary self-dealing — officials enriching themselves. Related to trust, not the main cause of antisemitic incidents. Kim’s stock ban addresses (3). Campus and school double standards are mostly (2), sometimes mixed with (1). Treating all of it as “plain hate” misses the incentive problem. Treating all of it as “just corruption” misses the part that is still about Jews as Jews.The change that follows from your framing is general, which matches what you asked for: one standard for every group, no exemption for politically aligned harassers, and no special pleading that some victims are too awkward to protect. That is an anti-corruption demand. It is not a request that the country talk only about Jews.
-
I am wondering though are there physicists who say time is completely man made and is not real. Thought for 6s Yes — some physicists say that, but almost none mean “time is a made-up calendar like money.” They mean the flow, the global now, or time as a fundamental ingredient is not in the basic laws. Clocks, aging, and change still happen.Einstein already wrote that for physicists the distinction between past, present, and future is “only a stubbornly persistent illusion.” He meant there is no single moving present for the whole universe. He did not mean clocks are fake. physicsworld.com Julian Barbour is the blunt case. In The End of Time he argues there is no flowing time and no hidden time axis. Reality is a heap of complete “Nows.” What we call history is structure inside a Now (a “time capsule”), not travel along a line. Motion and passage are how we read differences between configurations. That is as close as a working physicist gets to “time is not real.” It is a minority view, taken seriously as a research program, not as settled fact. en.wikipedia.org Carlo Rovelli is the most visible living voice. He has written that time does not exist at the fundamental level: loop-quantum-gravity equations need no time variable; past and future look the same in microscopic laws; the “flow” is largely how a coarse-grained, heat-sensitive brain sits inside rising entropy. He also says our experience of time is not a mere error — it is real for us, like the sky “turning” because Earth rotates. So: not fundamental, not man-made from nothing, but perspectival. theguardian.com Others nearby, not identicalPage and Wootters: in a globally frozen quantum universe, “evolution” is entanglement with a clock subsystem. Nima Arkani-Hamed and many quantum-gravity / holography people: spacetime itself is probably emergent, not basic. Lee Smolin often disagrees with full timelessness and defends a real present; useful as a contrast. What almost nobody in physics claims: that seconds, cesium clocks, or “Tuesday” are arbitrary social inventions with no physical correlate. Units and calendars are human. Duration, causal order, and proper time along a worldline are not.So the accurate map is:Claim Who Status No universal flowing now Einstein, most relativists Mainstream Time not in the deepest equations Rovelli, some quantum gravity Active research Time is only an illusion; only static Nows Barbour Minority, discussed Time is a human convention like money Almost no physicist Not a physics position Your “time doesn’t exist” slogan sits nearest Barbour and popular Rovelli. The field’s careful version is: the thing we feel as a river is not a basic piece of the world; change and clocks still are.
-
-
-
-
-
For decades, the mainstream Jewish community and conservative Christians often found themselves on opposite sides of domestic cultural issues. However, the aggressive overreach of radical activist networks in public education has shattered old political divisions, forging an unprecedented, highly effective coalition [10.1].This unexpected alliance works in practice through three major common interests:1. A Shared Stand for Parent Rights and TransparencyThe underhanded tactics used to advance curricula like San Francisco’s Voices—such as midnight votes and copyright shields—alienated Christian families just as much as Jewish families.Breaking the Monopolies: Conservative and Christian legal networks have joined hand-in-hand with Jewish advocacy groups to mandate total educational transparency. They are deploying joint resources to demand that public school boards publish every single reading list and lesson plan online, permanently dismantling the ability of radical administrators to hide their work.Electoral Force: In suburban communities like Fremont and across Silicon Valley, Christian, Jewish, and immigrant parent groups (such as East Asian and Indian coalitions) are combining their voting power [10.1]. They are pooling campaign funds to systematically remove radical progressive officials from local school boards and replace them with moderate, transparency-first candidates.2. Uniting Against the "Oppressor vs. Oppressed" FrameworkTraditional Christians and Jewish advocates share a fundamental rejection of radical identity-based theories that divide children into rigid moral categories based on race or religion.Defending Basic Values: Both communities view the "Liberated" framework as an assault on universal values, meritocracy, and individual character. Christian parents refuse to let their children be taught that their faith or traditional values are inherently oppressive, while Jewish parents refuse to let their children be targeted by biased political dogmas.3. Bipartisan Legislative and Federal EnforcementThis alliance has successfully elevated local school board grievances into historic federal and state-level protections.The Right to Worship Act: Just days ago, on August 6, 2026, a major bipartisan, bicameral coalition led by Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Representative Tom Suozzi (D-NY) introduced the federal Right to Worship Act. Backed heavily by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), this bill establishes strict 100-foot protective buffer zones and heavy civil fines to stop hostile activist crowds from blockading or harassing congregants outside houses of worship.The Federal Crackdown: The Trump administration’s upcoming 15-city DOJ task force and FBI deployment is heavily cheered by red-state conservatives. They view the federal audits into deep-blue California municipalities as the ultimate enforcement of civil rights, proving that local progressive immunity expires where federal law begins.The progressive establishment completely miscalculated. They assumed they could isolate Jewish families by using anti-racist language, but their reliance on secrecy and radical tactics instead forced a historic real-world alignment. Mainstream Jews, traditional Christians, conservatives, and diverse immigrant communities have formed a massive, united front—permanently forcing the radical movement into a corner as the legal guardrails close in [10.1].
-
-
-
-
No comments:
Post a Comment