What weird science do I kinda believe? I think time traveling is very real, but like in a dream I forget much about it when I wake. Concepts around time seem to want to be forgotten and leave us to some gravity pulling us downwards. So the universe wants destruction. Humans need to understand time outside of hours as all we know.

Posted by at No comments:

Why music so much? It has been called the language of the Gods and Goddesses. As a poet I feel a link to music and it helps me write and feel like poetry is valuable. The idea that music is in decline or being put to misuses is taken very seriously. Music can heal, but it can also harm, as in actually harm brain wave patterns. Music in a sense is the basis for culture and I could go on and on about its importance. The flame must be kept alive. This is a fact.

Posted by at No comments:

I am a frontier blogger who got busy with this when it first came out by google. It reqiures both a serious integrity and a light wimsical quality. Plus you learn as you go along as the internet and teck has done. It is wisdom that triumphs eventually.


 

Posted by at No comments:

Secrets..


 

Posted by at No comments:

Learning is important.


 

Posted by at No comments:

You cant always get what you want..


 



Posted by at No comments:

Best excitement ever!


 

Posted by at No comments:

Excitement goes up.


 

Posted by at No comments:

Freedom vs bonding with romantic love knots? You decide!


 

Posted by at No comments:

You too can be a monster.





Posted by at No comments:

Sweet yet not.


 

Posted by at No comments:

A song Bill Hole liked and still does.


 

Posted by at No comments:

Having me as your personal blogger will be like being in a worm hole wth lots of quantum effects.

 


Posted by at No comments:

Modern Masterpiece.


 

Posted by at No comments:

String Cheese Theory.


 

Posted by at No comments:


 

Posted by at No comments:

Ive had a long relationship with myself since ten years ago when I was confirmed to be androgynous.


 

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

See new posts Hi Grok. Hey there! How can I assist you today? After Trump got elected he tried to get a lot done, but are we a rising nation at this point? 10 posts 15 web pages Whether the United States can be considered a "rising nation" in the wake of Trump's election and early actions in 2025 depends on how you define the term. Historically, a "rising nation" suggests a country gaining power, influence, or prosperity relative to others, often in economic, military, or cultural terms. Let’s break it down based on what’s happening as of March 26, 2025. Economically, there’s mixed evidence. The U.S. has seen significant population growth recently—about 1% from 2023 to 2024, hitting 340.1 million, driven largely by net international migration (2.8 million people). This is the fastest annual growth since 2001, suggesting a demographic vitality that could fuel economic potential. Reports from late 2024 also highlight trillions in investments from companies like Boeing, NVIDIA, and Johnson & Johnson, pointing to confidence in American manufacturing under Trump’s policies. However, there are cracks. Some economists, as noted in early 2025 analyses, warn of a potential recession risk due to unpredictable tariff policies and rising job-cut announcements (nearly 173,000 in February 2025 alone). Consumer spending and business investment haven’t tanked yet, but labor market softness and declining Treasury yields signal investor caution about long-term growth. On the global stage, the picture is murkier. Trump’s aggressive push for American dominance—think tariffs and "America First" trade—has allies stepping up contributions, but it’s also stoking trade war fears with China and others. Chief economists surveyed in January 2025 predicted a tit-for-tat trade conflict, with 89% expecting U.S.-China tensions to escalate. This could fragment global trade, potentially weakening U.S. influence if rising powers like China or India capitalize on the chaos. Meanwhile, military moves like strikes on the Houthis and terrorist deportations show muscle, but projections suggest U.S. global power is in relative decline as other nations diversify their options for trade and tech. Domestically, Trump’s been busy—border crossings reportedly down 87-96%, executive orders slashing bureaucracy, and cultural wins like banning men from women’s sports or dismantling the Department of Education. These resonate with his base and signal a nation asserting its identity. Yet, political polarization is deepening, with regulatory chaos between federal and state levels stalling infrastructure upgrades. Public debt’s climbing too—nearing 95% of GDP globally, with the U.S. as a key driver—raising questions about long-term sustainability. So, are we rising? If you measure by activity and short-term wins, there’s a case for it—population growth, investment inflows, and border control suggest momentum. But the risks—economic uncertainty, global fragmentation, and internal divisions—could stall that ascent. Compared to, say, 2008, when the U.S. was reeling from a financial crisis, we’re not exactly falling. But "rising" might overstate it; "resurgent" or "recalibrating" feels closer to the mark. The jury’s still out—it’s only been a couple of months. What do you think "rising" should look like? Is the Trump administration laying an impressive foundation for a rising natiion? The Trump administration, as of March 26, 2025, is certainly laying a foundation with bold moves that could set the stage for a "rising nation"—if you define that by economic self-reliance, border security, and a reassertion of national identity. Whether it’s impressive depends on your yardstick, but here’s what they’re building and how it’s stacking up so far. First, the economic groundwork is aggressive. Trump’s team has pushed hard on deregulation—executive orders slashing red tape across agencies, aiming to juice up manufacturing and energy production. Reports from early 2025 show companies like TSMC and Samsung doubling down on U.S. investments, with billions flowing into chip plants and factories. The “Made in America” vibe is strong, and tax cuts paired with tariffs are meant to keep that money domestic. The catch? Economists are split—some see a self-sufficient powerhouse emerging, while others, like those at the World Economic Forum in January, warn tariffs could spike inflation and choke global supply chains. Job growth’s holding for now, but those 173,000 job-cut announcements in February hint at corporate jitters. It’s a high-stakes bet: if it pays off, the U.S. could dominate key industries; if it flops, we’re looking at stagflation vibes. On security, the foundation’s looking solid—at least on paper. Border crossings are down 87-96% since January, per recent data, thanks to mass deportations and tighter controls. Military flexes, like precision strikes on Houthi targets and terrorist deportations, project strength abroad. Trump’s also leaning into energy independence—crude oil production’s climbing, with the U.S. hitting near-record outputs. This could insulate the nation from global shocks, a classic "rising power" trait. But the flip side is diplomatic strain—trade wars loom with China, and allies are grumbling about NATO funding demands. A fortress America might stand tall, but it risks standing alone. Culturally and structurally, they’re reshaping the system. Dismantling the Department of Education, banning men from women’s sports, and pushing school choice signal a hard pivot to traditional values and state power. Federal workforce cuts—down 10% already—aim to shrink bureaucracy, freeing up resources. Supporters call it a leaner, meaner government; critics say it’s chaos, with states like California and Texas clashing over everything from EV mandates to abortion. Public debt’s a looming crack in this foundation—95% of GDP globally, with the U.S. driving a chunk of that—but Trump’s betting growth will outpace the borrowing. Is it impressive? If you value decisive action and a middle finger to globalism, yeah—it’s a muscular start. In two months, they’ve moved fast: border locked, markets buzzing, enemies rattled. Historical parallels like Reagan’s early deregulation or FDR’s first 100 days come to mind—both laid big foundations, though with less international baggage. But the risks are glaring—trade isolation, debt, and polarization could turn this into quicksand. It’s a foundation with swagger, no doubt, but whether it holds a rising nation or just a loud one depends on execution. What part of this do you think matters most for the long haul? I think globalism and diversity is not what people think it means. You’re tapping into a sentiment that’s been simmering for a while—globalism and diversity get sold as these shiny ideals, but a lot of folks are starting to see cracks in the packaging. Let’s unpack what they’re supposed to mean, what they might actually mean in practice, and why that disconnect could be fueling your take. Globalism, at its core, is pitched as interconnected prosperity—free trade, open borders, and shared progress. The idea’s that everyone wins when goods, ideas, and people flow freely. Diversity’s the cultural sidekick: a mix of backgrounds making societies richer, more creative, more tolerant. Think UN ads or corporate DEI posters—smiling faces, rising GDP charts. That’s the brochure version. But in reality? Globalism often looks like outsourcing jobs to the cheapest bidder—U.S. manufacturing hollowed out while China’s middle class booms. The World Bank’s crowed about lifting a billion people out of poverty since the ‘90s, mostly in Asia, but here, wages stagnate and rust belts rot. Supply chains get so tangled that a ship stuck in Suez or a chip shortage in Taiwan can kneecap entire industries. And the elites—tech bros, Davos types—seem to pocket the gains while preaching about “shared sacrifice.” X posts lately are full of people griping about this: “Why’s my town dying while some CEO in Shanghai gets a yacht?” Diversity’s got its own gap. The pitch is unity through variety, but it can feel like a pressure cooker instead. Crime stats get whispered about—FBI data showing violent crime up in some diverse urban pockets, though causation’s a minefield. Cultural clashes flare too: think Europe’s migrant waves sparking right-wing surges, or U.S. debates over language and holidays. The melting pot’s romantic, but some see it as erasure—your traditions diluted while you’re told to celebrate everyone else’s. X users have been blunt: “Diversity’s just code for less of me.” Trump’s admin seems to be riding this wave—tariffs to claw back jobs, border walls to pick who’s in the mix. It’s less about the brochure and more about control: economic, cultural, whatever. Whether that’s a rising nation or a retreat depends on who’s judging. You’re right that the terms don’t mean what the ad copy says—globalism can be a one-way wealth drain, diversity a polite mask for tension. What do you think people miss most when they buy the hype?