This not so beautiful liberal democracy is looking very Nazi in the radical world: You said What is going on with those purity tests on Jews Gemini said The term "purity tests" for Jews is currently being used in two very different ways. Depending on whether you're seeing this in the context of campus politics or Israeli religious law, it refers to two separate controversies. 1. Ideological "Purity Tests" (Social & Political) In the U.S. and Europe, this term is increasingly used by Jewish advocacy groups to describe a social phenomenon where Jewish individuals are being asked to denounce Zionism or the State of Israel as a condition for being accepted into progressive spaces. The "Condition": Jews in student organizations, professional circles, or activist groups report being told they are only "acceptable" if they explicitly identify as anti-Zionist. The Criticism: Critics call these "purity tests" a form of modern antisemitism, arguing that they force Jews to renounce a core part of their identity (their connection to their ancestral homeland) just to participate in public life. The Trend: As of February 2026, reports indicate this is spreading beyond universities into professional fields like psychology and the arts.

The ‘anti-Zionist’ inquisition comes for Matt Lucas Anti-Israel zealots are now subjecting British Jews to ideological purity tests. Alex Hearn 17th February 2026 The ‘anti-Zionist’ inquisition comes for Matt Lucasi Share Topics Politics UK Want unlimited, ad-free access? Become a spiked supporter. Comedian Matt Lucas was harassed by a phone-wielding activist on the London Underground last week. It seems Lucas had committed the unforgivable sin of being Jewish in public. Pro-Palestinian activist Thomas Abdullah Bourne filmed himself pursuing Lucas up an escalator, repeatedly bellowing ‘Free Palestine’ at him. Lucas, who has avoided commenting on the Israel-Gaza conflict, tried to politely defuse the situation. It made no difference. Bourne muttered ‘Zionist’ to camera as Lucas walked away, the accusation hanging in the air like a medieval verdict. Welcome to Britain in 2026, where purity tests are administered on the Tube. This is the kind of ideological harassment that British Jews now navigate daily. It’s a pattern that’s becoming impossible to ignore, growing like a societal fungal infection. Needless to say, such harassment isn’t confined to public transport or even just to Jews. It’s coming to all of our doorsteps, too. Do you hate Jews enough? Some people want to check, and they could be knocking on your door next. Just days before Lucas was targeted, volunteers calling for an ‘apartheid-free zone’ in Brighton and Hove fanned out across the city, knocking on doors with clipboards and pledge forms. According to local Jewish resident Vicky Bhogal, who observed the campaign, activists were systematically visiting households, ‘finding out who has got Zionist leanings and who hasn’t, and where they live’. When challenged, the campaign organiser insisted it was ‘no different from the actions of a political party like the Conservative Party or the Labour Party who also go door to door’. Enjoying spiked? Why not make an instant, one-off donation? We are funded by you. Thank you! £5 £10 £20 £50 Choose an amount This comparison is, of course, obscene. Political canvassers don’t demand ideological loyalty oaths. They don’t ask you to publicly renounce a foreign nation. They don’t create lists marking who passes the test and who fails. Cabinet minister Peter Kyle, who is also the MP for Hove, immediately grasped what was unfolding. He described ‘the appalling scenario of a vulnerable Jewish resident being door-knocked by a gang of people wanting to harangue them’. The great revolt against greenism Recommended The great revolt against greenism Brendan O'Neill The door-knocking campaigns and Tube confrontations share the same DNA. Both operate on the grotesque assumption that Jews – regardless of their actual views on Israel – must answer for the supposed actions of a foreign government. And everyone else must publicly declare where they stand, too. The door-knockers aren’t just harassing Jews – they are mapping entire neighbourhoods for ideological purity. The statistics tell the story these activists desperately want to hide. According to the Community Security Trust (CST), Israel-Palestine rhetoric is routinely weaponised to intimidate random Jewish people in public. As the CST notes, slogans like ‘Free Palestine’ become anti-Semitic when deployed to harass, intimidate and alarm Jewish people and institutions, simply because they are Jewish. That’s what happened to Matt Lucas. He wasn’t challenged because of anything he had said or done. He was challenged because he had the temerity to exist as a Jew in public space. The Brighton door-knockers predictably insist they’re ‘not anti-Semitic, but anti-Zionist’, as if the semantic gymnastics provide moral cover. But when your campaign involves compiling lists of residents based on their presumed views about the world’s only Jewish State, you’ve crossed a line that should horrify anyone with even a cursory understanding of 20th-century history. Similar ‘boycott’ campaigns in both Europe and the Middle East were followed by the wiping out of entire Jewish populations. It’s a familiar reality for Jews, so we recognise it when it arrives in British cities carrying clipboards. It is chilling how institutions bend to these demands. Sussex Police initially saw no problem with activists compiling neighbourhood lists of suspected Zionists. They only reversed course after sustained pressure from Peter Kyle and others. Green MP Sian Berry wrung her hands about the tactic being ‘confrontational’, while rushing to assure everyone the door-knockers were ‘well intentioned’. Her colleague, Carla Denyer, Green MP for Bristol Central, dispensed with even that fig leaf. She joined a similar door-knocking campaign herself in Bristol, and proudly signed its pledge to boycott Israeli goods. Spain’s woke autocracy Video Spain’s woke autocracy spiked When elected officials participate in campaigns that leave Jewish constituents feeling unsafe in their own neighbourhoods, and police forces need to be arm-twisted into recognising obvious harassment, we’re witnessing the normalisation of something profoundly ugly. This is a worldview that demands public declarations of political allegiance as the price of acceptance. That sees Jews not as individuals but as collectively accountable to a righteous group of activists. When stripped of its ‘progressive’ veneer, it is indistinguishable from age-old anti-Jewish racism. Matt Lucas kept his dignity on that escalator, but he shouldn’t have had to. No British Jew should have to navigate public transport wondering if they’ll be the next person filmed for an ideological litmus test. No Jewish family should open their door to find activists with clipboards asking them to renounce Israel. This is what the new inquisition looks like. It comes with clipboards instead of torches, and the show trial now takes place on Instagram. But it’s the same question Jews have been asked for centuries: do you really belong with us? And in Britain in 2026, that question should have no place at all. Alex Hearn is director of Labour Against Anti-Semitism.

SHE LOVES ALL HIS DANCE MOVES, AND SHE IS GOING TO MARRY HIM.

JEWISH DIVIDERS SOUND LIKE THIS: zee83 @LindseyGrahamSC and @MohamedBinZayed In fact, many Jews themselves stand firmly against the Zionist movement, asserting that it does not represent Judaism, but is rather a diabolical and extremist political movement. BUT WHEN HITLER IS CAUGHT WITH A KNIFE BEHIND HIS BACK JEWS COME TOGETHER AS ONE.

The Daily Signal @DailySignal · Feb 14 . @VDHanson : How the Trump Administration Could Rewrite the Midterm Rules With about nine months left until November’s midterm elections, “a pathway to save the Republican Congress, and thereby to save the Trump counterrevolution,” is forming. President Trump has a lot “in his favor.” He’s sanctioned a “radical economic revolution” and also “stopped illegal immigration.” “This is a whole new ball game. We’ve never seen politics like this, and you can win the midterms even though you’re an incumbent president.”

Supporting Antifa in an educational context would amplify the anti-democratic nature of ideological capture to a dangerous degree. Antifa's core characteristics Antifa is a loose, decentralized far-left militant movement that explicitly rejects liberal democracy in favor of direct action, deplatforming, and sometimes violence to combat perceived fascism. It opposes free speech for opponents, views institutions (including schools) as tools for revolutionary change, and often aligns with anarchist or accelerationist tactics. Open support for it goes beyond standard left politics into endorsing extra-legal methods.Why educator or institutional support crosses a line Undermines the rule of law — Public schools are state institutions bound by democratic norms (elections, due process, free expression under the First Amendment). Teachers or curricula that fantasize, romanticize, excuse, or promote Antifa-style tactics (property destruction, no-platforming, "by any means necessary") teach contempt for democratic mechanisms. This is especially toxic for youth, who are still forming civic habits. Heightens indoctrination risk — In captured systems (e.g., activist factions within unions like Oakland Education Association), materials that frame Antifa sympathetically as heroic resisters fit the pattern of one-sided narratives. We've seen unauthorized "teach-ins" and "liberatory education" pushes in Oakland and similar districts that critics argue veer into political activism rather than balanced analysis. Glorifying militant groups adds an endorsement of violence to ideological skew. rethinkingschools.org Disproportionate harm — For less-educated or captive audiences (K-12 students), this normalizes extremism. It can desensitize youth to political violence, chill dissent in classrooms, and erode trust in democratic institutions. Post-2020 riots and campus disruptions showed real-world spillover. Anti-democratic double standard — Democracy allows debate over ideas, even radical ones. But state-funded educators actively supporting a movement that rejects debate itself (via doxxing, riots, or "punch a Nazi" rhetoric that expands "Nazi" to include mainstream conservatives) is viewpoint discrimination with state power behind it. It's the opposite of pluralism. Reality checkNot every progressive educator supports Antifa—many explicitly reject its violence. Direct endorsements in official curricula are rare and often opposed by districts when publicized. However, tolerance or soft-pedaling in activist teacher circles, reading lists that lionize radical left figures, or failure to condemn Antifa-linked tactics does occur in highly polarized blue-city environments and feeds the capture critique.This would make the problem not just bias, but incitement against democratic norms. Reforms emphasizing classical civics, viewpoint balance, and strict political neutrality in K-12 become even more urgent. Public education should prepare citizens for democracy, not recruit for its rejection..