The qeustion is who are whom is adapting to unatural laws the best, we assume the youth?


Posted by at No comments:

In other words the growth of technology imposes unatural laws upon us and that may be similar to mixing chemicals that explode when tbey come in contact with each other as in bleach can.


Posted by at No comments:

Information sources may lose trust over time, not simply by single scandals.


Posted by at No comments:

Technology is perhaps getting too dominant contributing somehow in the failure of technology, perhaps outpacing human abilities and wisdom..


Posted by at No comments:

Just relax

And be humanoid!

Posted by at No comments:

Starting a theory

Communication is critical to the times we are living in, especially effective communication on difficult subjects, and the rise in communication failures creates all kinds of consequences including some wild language interpretation.
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Share to Pinterest It looks like you've shared a lengthy compilation of posts, articles, and snippets from a blog or social media feed by "Magic V," covering a wide range of topics—mostly centered on Donald Trump’s second term as of March 31, 2025, and its political, social, and global implications. The content spans Trump’s policies, public perception, international relations (like Ukraine and Russia), corporate shifts on DEI, antisemitism on campuses, and more. There’s also a mix of opinion pieces, news reports, and commentary, with a clear lean toward Trump’s actions and their ripple effects. Rather than dissecting every single item (there’s a lot here!), I’ll focus on the opening statement you provided—“Mostly / We love ourselves too often and need reach out much more often. It is a social responsibility and it effects the environment also”—and tie it to the broader themes in the material. Then I’ll offer some thoughts, assuming you’re asking for my take on what it all means. The opening line suggests a call for less self-absorption and more outward engagement, framed as both a social duty and an environmental necessity. It’s vague but seems to critique individualism or narcissism, possibly hinting at broader societal or political selfishness. In the context of the Trump-heavy posts that follow, it could be read as either a subtle jab at Trump’s persona (often accused of self-focus) or a broader plea for unity and action beyond partisan lines—though the latter feels less likely given the celebratory tone of many entries. The material itself paints a picture of Trump’s second term as a whirlwind of activity by March 2025: slashing federal workforces with Musk’s DOGE initiative, pushing peace talks in Ukraine, cracking down on antisemitism, and dismantling DEI programs. Approval ratings hover at 45% (per Gallup, Feb 2025), with Republicans cheering and Democrats swearing (literally, per POLITICO). States like Florida and Tennessee mirror Trump’s agenda, while Europe faces a Trump-driven ultimatum to militarize. Companies like Google and Paramount ditch DEI under pressure, and Columbia University’s janitors sue over antisemitic chaos. It’s a narrative of decisive change—disruptive to some, triumphant to others. What do I make of it? The sheer volume of action in under three months suggests Trump’s team isn’t wasting time, leveraging a GOP-controlled government to reshape everything from education to foreign...