Mostly
We love ourselves too often and need reach out much more often. It is a social responsibility and it effects the environment also.
NEW STORY! I imagine such a plot where high instability and antisemetism act as cover while heavy control is unleashed in the western world. But trump was elected and acted fast to stop this from happening! This plot concept mirrors a popular genre in political fiction and alternate history, where real-world anxieties about societal instability, prejudice, and government overreach are explored through a dramatic lens. In speculative fiction, using high-stakes political turmoil as a backdrop allows writers to examine complex themes. Here is how you can develop this premise into a structured narrative:Narrative DynamicsThe Catalyst: The story opens with rising civil unrest, economic volatility, and targeted discrimination (antisemitism) destabilizing Western nations.The Shadow Threat: Under the guise of restoring order, a faction of bureaucrats or international bodies begins implementing invasive surveillance and restricting civil liberties. The Disruption: The election of Donald Trump serves as the turning point. His administration's "anti-establishment" and nationalist approach directly clashes with the entrenched bureaucratic system attempting to consolidate power.The Conflict: The plot centers on a fast-paced executive and legal battle, where the newly elected administration moves rapidly to dismantle the control mechanisms before they become permanent.Key Themes to ExploreThe Illusion of Security: How governments sometimes use genuine crises to justify stripping away individual freedoms.The Deep State vs. Populism: The classic political thriller trope of an outsider president fighting against a hidden, permanent government apparatus.The Speed of Power: The narrative tension relies on timing—acting quickly enough to disrupt a system before it locks into place.If you are developing this into a story, script, or outline, we can flesh out specific characters, key scenes, or the exact mechanisms used to halt the overreach.To help build this narrative, would you like to focus on character development (such as the main protagonist inside the administration), the specific mechanics of how the control is stopped, or creating a chapter-by-chapter outline?
Key FBI Preliminary 2025 Data (Full-Year Trends into 2026 Reporting)Overall hate crimes: Declined ~9% from 2024's 11,679 incidents to around 10,634. This aligns with the post-surge moderation after the Israel-Hamas conflict peak. advancingjustice-aajc.org Anti-Jewish: Sharp drop (~29% from 2024 peaks), but still the third-highest on record and far above pre-2023 levels. Anti-Jewish bias continued to dominate religious hate crimes. calhro.org Increases/Records in Other Groups:Anti-Latino: Rose to a record high (+18% from 2024 in some analyses), reaching over 1,000 incidents. This marked an all-time peak. calhro.org Anti-Sikh: Surged +59% to 226 incidents, a decade high and record. advancingjustice-aajc.org Anti-Asian: Declined ~16-17% from 2024 (to ~318 incidents) but remained more than double the pre-pandemic average (~133/year). Some sub-trends (e.g., South Asians) showed rises. advancingjustice-aajc.org Anti-Muslim: Modest decline (~13-16% to ~199-221 incidents). advancingjustice-aajc.org Anti-Black: Declined ~10% from 2024 highs but stayed among the highest volume categories overall. calhro.org Anti-White: Slight increase (+6%). calhro.org These patterns come from preliminary FBI Uniform Crime Reporting data analyzed by groups like Advancing Justice-AAJC and others as of April 2026. Full 2025 FBI release would provide more granularity, but monthly trends suggest continuation into early 2026. jasher.substack.com
I am referring to those who are not Jews, who may be losing interest. Thought for 7s Yes, there is evidence from 2025–2026 surveys that many non-Jewish Americans (the general public) show signs of reduced attention, lower perceived urgency, or fatigue regarding antisemitism compared to the immediate post-October 7 peak. This manifests as declining awareness of its seriousness, fewer "allies" willing to actively push back, and a sense that it's a durable but less mobilizing issue—often blending into broader Israel/Gaza war fatigue. bluesquarealliance.org Key Data from General Public SurveysBlue Square Alliance "Stand Up to Jewish Hate" Survey (2025): Antisemitism awareness has fallen even as incidents remain elevated. The share of "allies" (well-informed and ready to stand against it) dropped sharply from 15% in 2023 to 9% in 2025. Nearly half of Americans now believe Jews can "handle antisemitism on their own" (up significantly). About 3 in 5 view it as a minor problem or not a problem at all. The surge has "leveled off" at alarming levels rather than receding. bluesquarealliance.org +1 AJC State of Antisemitism Report 2025 (General Public Survey, Oct 2025): Only 28% of the general public called antisemitism a "very serious" problem (vs. nearly half of Jewish Americans). Still, 45% reported personally seeing or hearing it in the past year (mostly online), showing exposure without heightened alarm. A clear perception gap exists between Jews and non-Jews. ajc.org +1 Yale Youth Poll (Spring 2026): Overall, 63% of voters agreed antisemitism is a "serious problem," but this drops to just 55% among 18–34-year-olds (vs. 78% for 65+). Younger non-Jews also show higher endorsement of antisemitic beliefs. youthpoll.yale.edu Harvard CAPS-Harris (May 2026): 54% said antisemitism is rising, 82% said it's important to stop/eliminate it. However, this coexists with broader shifts (e.g., declining sympathy for Israel and views of the conflict as dragging on). jewishvirtuallibrary.org Contributing FactorsNormalization and "Mundane" Effect: ADL's 2026 State of Hate noted antisemitism has become so commonplace that incidents that once shocked now barely register for many. This desensitization reduces sustained interest. adl.org Israel/Gaza Fatigue: Polls (Gallup, etc.) show shifting sympathies (more toward Palestinians, especially among younger and independent voters) and lower priority for the issue. Discussions of antisemitism often get entangled in this, leading some non-Jews to disengage or view alerts as overreach. nytimes.com Plateau After Peak: Post-2023/2024 surge, overall incidents declined in 2025, which may reduce visibility and urgency for outsiders even if the baseline remains high and assaults persist. In short, while majorities still reject overt antisemitism and see value in addressing it, non-Jewish engagement has softened—fewer active allies, lower urgency ratings, and fatigue from prolonged coverage. This doesn't mean prejudice is disappearing (latent attitudes remain concerning), but public interest and mobilization appear to be waning among segments of the general population. Jewish communities report the opposite: sustained or heightened concern and behavioral changes.
People said it couldn't be done: Over the last 15 years, the general interest in poetry has nearly doubled. If you look back to its lowest point around 2012, the number of people reading or listening to poetry has jumped from roughly 1 in 15 adults to nearly 1 in 7 adults today.
Pope Leo XIV @Pontifex · Jun 18 History shows schemes of violence and oppression, of power and domination, of gains made without justice and without scruples. They backfire against those who suffer because of them and also against those who pursue them. Let us pray to Jesus, the Lord of peace, and let us appeal to people’s consciences so that they may be moved by indignation. May respect for humanity and a proper sense of civility be restored!
Dear Corporations: And you know, some would argue that now the industry's maybe going too far.— And when you alienate people, You said: They need to focus on the product more, and not the advertizement Exactly. When a product is genuinely excellent, the product itself becomes the marketing.When companies rely on aggressive advertising, it is often a smoke screen to compensate for a mediocre, declining, or uninspired product.This shift in corporate priorities hurts the consumer in a few distinct ways:Misallocated Budgets: Millions of dollars flow into ad agencies and user-acquisition algorithms instead of funding research, development, and engineering.Engineered Dependency: Instead of building a product people love, companies focus on psychological hooks, streaks, and notifications to force engagement.The "Good Enough" Trap: Once a company dominates ad space, they only need a product that is just good enough to keep people from quitting, halting real innovation.When a business focuses entirely on craftsmanship, utility, and user experience, word of mouth naturally follows. The value is built directly into the tool, not into a manipulative campaign to sell it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)