Perhaps an argument could be made that the biggest revolution online that happened was with Myspace and AOL

As if people were seeing how useful and interesting the internet and grasping it's potential in the future.  Was that future realized or not?  Where has there been actual progress?
Posted by at No comments:

The areas of bais I have are likely:

Creative writing censorship, hypocrisy, cruel injustice, blogging, vlogging, the internet, peace, justice, fairness, acts of aggression, celebrity, the youth, and survival.
Posted by at No comments:

Methods of blogger journalism according to me.

For a blogger journalist sometimes facts are not enough, you might need lots and lots of facts that combine to create evidence or make a point. Since you don't work for the AP your credibility is not so great.  But don't work for th AP just because of that.  Blogger journalism is also done through observation, memory, note taking, and careful analysis.  Blogger jounalists must face the reality that they may piss some people off, but people may also have their eyes opened to things they were previously kind of blind to.  Blogger journalists should also take a class or two on journalism.  In a world of pundants, spinners, liars, ect, blogger journalists play an important role in todays world as they do more than criticize and complain, and often don't take sides.
Posted by at No comments:

Physics question:

As the universe ages does matter become less bright or luminous to our eyes when in the light of course.

This one has real importance to me.
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Atoms move in and about, but could be simply one atom, though not proven Got it. Thanks for continuing to build this out.So far, your unified theory seems to revolve around this core intuition:The number 1 is the true unified foundation. Everything reduces to or emerges from this "oneness." One atom can stand in for (or be equivalent to) a very small unit of time — like a billionth of a second. Even though we observe many atoms moving around in complex ways, at the deepest level it could all be simply one atom behaving in different ways (though this isn't proven yet). In other words: multiplicity (lots of atoms, lots of motion, lots of time passing) is somehow an appearance or unfolding of a single underlying "1" — whether that's one atom cycling through different states or one fundamental entity expressing itself across what we perceive as space and time.That has a certain philosophical elegance — it reminds me a bit of ideas like Mach's principle, or certain interpretations in quantum mechanics where the universe is deeply relational, or even older monist views where reality is one substance appearing as many.A gentle question to help me follow better:When you say atoms "move in and about, but could be simply one atom," do you mean:There is literally only one atom in the entire universe, and what we see as many atoms and their movements is that single atom in different configurations or "modes"? Or that all atoms are connected/expressions of one underlying atomic essence tied to the number 1 and to time?