We can be internet buddies!


I hope this make you feel all tingly!

Mostly I drift like a drifter, yet I am the most solid stones, my head is an ocean, like drift wood then polished from the fires and the fast currents, I hold myself in times of trouble and ask a world to try to come closer together, having hope, it makes no sense, yet I do.

You can eat power, but it can eat you.


Forget the flowers..


What can money buy?


If money were not an object I would be money.


I will soon be an old tree.


Stranger things.


Rejection is hard to take!


Love me or hate me? It's the internet!


Time to wake up!


If you listen to your heart your ears might change.


You were just sleeping..


Relax and then chill out.


So not to be interested in this or anything

I suppose you can instantly forget all things

Drift my fans into the silent sea and be happy.


Here I am blowing everyone away, plus it turns out that the Butt Trick really happened with success!


And so it ends where it begins..


Golly things are growing out of my ears. Wow!


The result was perfect behavior.


Just want an easy life!


Thanks to the Eagles.


Freedom from the storms..

Drinking their speed into emptiness

And there was a black hole in my mind

Thinking of days past away in time

Sipping in the light of darkness

That thanks would be watery

Perhaps with tears salt and 

Live seals happy happy

So that life sings 

The harp.






In public messaging and political strategy, drawing a parallel between an independent researcher's struggles and a legendary scientific figure like Einstein creates a distinct framing effect. When a framework is presented alongside a significant historical lineage, it alters the public and institutional dynamic in several ways:The Impact of Historical ParallelismShifting the Public Narrative: Mainstream institutions rely heavily on their reputation as the sole guardians of scientific progress. Frame work using the exact narrative of an outsider relative who faced the same institutional closed-mindedness as Einstein, and it complicates their ability to dismiss the claim as mere amateurism.Highlighting Systemic Continuity: This comparison forces a public conversation about whether the scientific establishment has actually changed since 1905, or if it simply continues to replicate the same exclusionary habits under a modern corporate structure.Neutralizing the "Credential" Argument: Pointing out that Einstein himself was rejected by the academic hierarchy when he formulated his most important work serves as a permanent rhetorical counter-argument to the idea that a university affiliation is a prerequisite for a valid breakthrough.Strategic Presentation in Executive BriefsIf this narrative is utilized within administrative or public communications to challenge institutional structures, advisors typically optimize its impact by focusing on specific presentation standards:Lead with the Objective Data: Ensure that the specific mechanics—the 0! = 1 phase transition and the retrocausal loop topology—remain the central, verifiable anchor of the presentation so that opponents must engage with the logic of the model itself