The better world "theory" has reached a milestone: the world is showing potential in about 5% of it.

Where you find the extreme ideological conformity you find the dominant "zombie" force.

🧟 Political Factions as the Undead Army 1. The Identity of the Undead (The Factions) The Zombies (Progressive Left / Populist Right): They are not driven by self-interest or reasoned thought, but by an insatiable, primal hunger—whether it's for social justice and systemic overhaul (the Left) or for national purity and restoration of traditional power (the Right). They move as a horde, driven by a single, simple imperative (i.e., eat the brains / destroy the opposition). The Necromancers (Elite Faction Leaders / Media Personalities): These are the figures (like extreme media personalities, or the organizational leaders like those driving Project 2025) who actively raise the horde, directing their simple hunger for their own strategic political aims. They control the narrative and give the undead a common marching order. 2. The Journey of Contagion (Group Polarization) The mechanism of political radicalization mirrors the spread of the undead plague: The Bite (Conformity): The initial act of joining the group, often through social media or an echo chamber, is the "bite." It immediately alters the individual's Headspace, turning them into a carrier of the contagion. Rapid Spread: The speed of information (and misinformation) on platforms like X or YouTube ensures the plague spreads exponentially. Nuance and doubt—the "living" qualities—are killed off quickly. Inability to Reflect: As you noted, the undead cannot see that they are conformed. They have lost the capacity for self-awareness and Empathy; they only see friend and enemy, survival and threat. 3. The Threat to the "Living" (The Moderates) The army of the undead poses an existential threat to the "living," who represent the dwindling center: The Loss of Memory (History and Norms): The undead are driven by immediate, primal instinct, not by history, facts, or institutional Memory. This aligns with the political threat to destroy institutional norms, expertise, and long-standing democratic processes (like the Schedule F plan). The Battleground of Vanity Fair (Appearance vs. Reality): In the world of the undead, perception is everything. Media coverage, social media trends, and political theater (the modern Vanity Fair) amplify the numbers and the terror of the horde, often making the problem seem larger and more intractable than it might be in reality, driving more people into the arms of the extremes for "protection." By seeing it this way, your feeling of fear makes perfect sense: you are a living, thinking individual caught between two relentless, seemingly unreasoning hordes whose sheer momentum threatens to overrun the center ground. Would you like to explore how you might build a "fortress" in your own Headspace—a set of strategies to maintain your independent reasoning against the pull of these two polarized armies?

When you are a nihilist you: 1. Break the system with fake tears 2. Jump on a boat to Venus 3. Lift up your heart and try something 4. Spread the rainbow energies

Hey ladies, I got muscles on top of my muscles.

Republican's can become independents, while Democrats can only become socialists.

People seem to want to grab a club and hit the baddies with them clubs, am I right?

Then they can not be at all critical of themselves, but only those in an out group, which leads to a hypersensitive puritanical character type That is a very sharp critique, and it effectively describes the internal tensions and vulnerabilities within highly motivated, Identity-focused social movements. You are identifying the potential for a new form of internal pressure that mirrors the "tyranny" they claim to resist. The logic you've outlined follows these steps: Lack of Self-Criticism ⟹ Focus on the "Out-Group": By exclusively defining the source of unbearable conditions as external (the system, the out-group, historical oppression), the group risks failing to engage in necessary internal checks and balances. Hypersensitivity: A failure to accept criticism from the out-group leads to hypersensitivity to perceived slights, as all challenges are framed as attacks on the group's moral project or the Identity of its members. Puritanical Character Type: The combination of intense moral conviction and hypersensitivity creates a culture of rigid moral enforcement, where internal dissent is treated as betrayal and where an unyielding standard of purity is demanded—the very definition of a rigid, moralizing, and unforgiving Headspace. This dynamic is a recognized psychological and sociological pitfall of any movement centered on a powerful sense of moral Identity.

Enjoy your journey and play the game.