If you need to understand my relationship with physics its not easy for me to explain. I simply can't resist it. But its not just that, it appears like a butterfly that wants me to chase it with a net.

No comments:

Post a Comment

So, what they seem to be ignoring is that the reputation damage is already through the roof Yes. The reputation hit is already priced in. Acting as if the only risk is “if we talk about this too loudly” is late.What officials often optimize for is the next news cycle, the next coalition, the next lawsuit. What has already moved is harder to walk back:Campuses. After 2023–24, a large share of Jewish students and families treat some schools as unsafe or ideologically captured. ADL grades can tick up on paper. That does not automatically restore the older assumption that elite campuses are neutral ground. Donors, applicants, and faculty have already updated. California K–12. State reversals of district findings, ethnic-studies fights, and AB 715 trench warfare tell parents the system is politicized. You do not need a slogan. The complaint log is the reputation. Government generally. The Gallup 89% “corruption is widespread” number is not about Jews. It is the same trust collapse. When institutions look selective about whose safety counts, people infer the rules are for sale. That inference is already out there. The mistake is thinking reputation is a press release. Reputation is what people do next: where they send kids, where they give money, whether they believe a condemnation. Once “this place will not apply the same rule to everyone” sticks, a task force and a “hate has no home here” email do not unsay it.They are not only ignoring Jewish harm. They are ignoring that selective protection is now part of the brand—for universities, school systems, and parties. That damage does not wait for them to finish arguing about whether the federal hammer is too political.