Bipartisan Senate bill would bring security grants for houses of worship up to $1 billion, expand Jew-hatred response The new measure “addresses all of these forms of hate in one comprehensive bill and serves to be enacted by Congress as soon as possible,” stated Rabbi A.D. Motzen, of Agudah. May 19, 2026 Mike Wagenheim Republish Email CopyLink copied Print Jacky Rosen Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.) speaks a a Jewish Federations of North America press conference in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing room in the Dirksen Senate Office Building, May 19, 2026. Photo by Andrew Bernard. ( May 19, 2026 / JNS ) Sens. Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.) and James Lankford (R-Okla.), co-chairs of the Senate task force on fighting Jew-hatred, introduced the Jewish American Security Act, which would increase security funding for houses of worship, on Tuesday. If passed, the bill would raise Nonprofit Security Grant Program funding to $1 billion amid growing security needs, in the wake of violent, antisemitic acts across the country, which have left some communities vulnerable, including at Jewish community centers, day schools and nonprofits.  All religious institutions are eligible for the funding. “Jewish Americans are being targeted, attacked and killed simply because of who they are,” Rosen stated. “This alarming trend demands a comprehensive, bipartisan approach that addresses both the seeds and the impacts of this vile hatred.” “From social media to college campuses, we’ve seen how this bigotry manifests into real-world violence against Jews,” she added. “That’s why we must take concrete steps to understand the extent of antisemitism, both online and offline, and ensure that Jewish communities have access to robust security resources and government protections.” Lankford lamented that U.S. Jews “have faced an unprecedented surge in antisemitism—Jewish students targeted on campuses, synagogues vandalized, people attacked in the streets simply for their faith.” “That is not who we are as a nation,” he stated. “We unequivocally condemn antisemitism in all its forms. Every American deserves to live their faith freely, and that is worth fighting for.” Dan Goldman Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) speaks a a Jewish Federations of North America press conference in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing room in the Dirksen Senate Office Building, May 19, 2026. Photo by Andrew Bernard. The Anti-Defamation League stated that the legislation comes at a pivotal time, with its data showing a record-high 203 antisemitic assaults against American Jews last year. More than 30 of those incidents involved a deadly weapon, and three people were killed. Antisemitic incidents were recorded at a daily rate of 17, more than twice the average between 2020 and 2022. College campus Jew-hatred dropped slightly from 2024 but remained above historical trends. Nathan Diament, executive director of the Orthodox Union Advocacy Center, stated that the OU “strongly supports the Jewish American Security Act.” “The unprecedented wave of antisemitism demands an unprecedented response by our government, including $1 billion for the Nonprofit Security Grant Program that helps religious nonprofits protect their communal buildings,” he said. The new bill would require every regional civil rights office at the U.S. Education Department to provide five years of annual anti-discrimination training to federally funded recipients. It would also be called upon to launch a public awareness campaign explaining students’ rights and schools’ responsibilities under federal non-discrimination law, in Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. It would also create a dedicated Jew-hatred coordinator at the Education Department and other proactive measures for addressing antisemitism in K-12 schools.  The legislation authorizes the U.S. Justice Department to award grants to state and local law enforcement for increased protective patrols of religious institutions and for security training. Social media platforms with at least 50 million active monthly U.S. users would be required to publish public, biannual transparency reports to the Federal Trade Commission, detailing their moderation practices and approaches to antisemitic content. An annual congressional report promoting policy recommendations and identifying trends on the connection between online Jew-hatred and real-world violence would also be mandated. Members and officials from synagogues affected by terror attacks attended a press conference with Rosen to introduce the bill. Among them were Jen Lader, senior rabbi at Temple Israel of West Bloomfield, Mich., which was attacked by a Hezbollah-inspired terrorist in March. Zach Shemper, president of the Beth Israel Congregation of Jackson, Miss., which was set on fire in an attack in January, also attended. Agudath Israel of America, which represents Charedim, among the most visible Jews and therefore the most targeted, endorsed the bill.   “Jewish Americans face antisemitism wherever they turn: at school, at synagogue and even at home, thanks to the cesspool of unabashed antisemitism that is growing exponentially online,” stated Rabbi A.D. Motzen, national Agudah director of government affairs.  The new measure “addresses all of these forms of hate in one comprehensive bill and serves to be enacted by Congress as soon as possible,” he stated. Ted Deutch, CEO of the American Jewish Committee, endorsed the legislation. “We are at an inflection point. Surging antisemitism is not just a threat to the Jewish community,” he stated. “It is a crisis for our democracy and the values we cherish as Americans: pluralism, religious freedom and the promise of equal protection.” Reps. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) and Chris Smith (R-N.J.) are expected to introduce companion legislation in the House. Email CopyLink copied

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Supporting Antifa in an educational context would amplify the anti-democratic nature of ideological capture to a dangerous degree. Antifa's core characteristics Antifa is a loose, decentralized far-left militant movement that explicitly rejects liberal democracy in favor of direct action, deplatforming, and sometimes violence to combat perceived fascism. It opposes free speech for opponents, views institutions (including schools) as tools for revolutionary change, and often aligns with anarchist or accelerationist tactics. Open support for it goes beyond standard left politics into endorsing extra-legal methods.Why educator or institutional support crosses a line Undermines the rule of law — Public schools are state institutions bound by democratic norms (elections, due process, free expression under the First Amendment). Teachers or curricula that fantasize, romanticize, excuse, or promote Antifa-style tactics (property destruction, no-platforming, "by any means necessary") teach contempt for democratic mechanisms. This is especially toxic for youth, who are still forming civic habits. Heightens indoctrination risk — In captured systems (e.g., activist factions within unions like Oakland Education Association), materials that frame Antifa sympathetically as heroic resisters fit the pattern of one-sided narratives. We've seen unauthorized "teach-ins" and "liberatory education" pushes in Oakland and similar districts that critics argue veer into political activism rather than balanced analysis. Glorifying militant groups adds an endorsement of violence to ideological skew. rethinkingschools.org Disproportionate harm — For less-educated or captive audiences (K-12 students), this normalizes extremism. It can desensitize youth to political violence, chill dissent in classrooms, and erode trust in democratic institutions. Post-2020 riots and campus disruptions showed real-world spillover. Anti-democratic double standard — Democracy allows debate over ideas, even radical ones. But state-funded educators actively supporting a movement that rejects debate itself (via doxxing, riots, or "punch a Nazi" rhetoric that expands "Nazi" to include mainstream conservatives) is viewpoint discrimination with state power behind it. It's the opposite of pluralism. Reality checkNot every progressive educator supports Antifa—many explicitly reject its violence. Direct endorsements in official curricula are rare and often opposed by districts when publicized. However, tolerance or soft-pedaling in activist teacher circles, reading lists that lionize radical left figures, or failure to condemn Antifa-linked tactics does occur in highly polarized blue-city environments and feeds the capture critique.This would make the problem not just bias, but incitement against democratic norms. Reforms emphasizing classical civics, viewpoint balance, and strict political neutrality in K-12 become even more urgent. Public education should prepare citizens for democracy, not recruit for its rejection..