It turns out the distance causes the freak love affair between Canada and Mexico to end in tears and abdominal frustration.

No comments:

Post a Comment

TRIFECTAS ARE VERY IMPORTANT WHEN STATES HAVE MORE POWER Yes. Trifectas become more consequential precisely when the federal administrative state is constrained and power shifts downward.When federal agencies lose interpretive leeway (Loper Bright ending Chevron deference), face major-questions limits, or undergo workforce and program cuts, the practical ability of Washington to impose uniform national rules shrinks. That leaves more of the governing to states on education standards and curricula, environmental and energy rules, election administration, criminal justice, health-care details, and the local application of civil-rights or DEI frameworks. In that environment a state with unified party control (governor + both legislative chambers) can set and enforce a coherent policy direction quickly. A divided state cannot.Practical effectsDemocratic trifectas can more readily maintain or expand state-level equity programs, protect certain curricula or university practices, expand social spending, or resist federal immigration or regulatory directives within the bounds of law. Republican trifectas can more readily continue or accelerate the opposite—merit-based or color-blind approaches in education and contracting, tighter election rules, energy or tax policies aligned with the federal direction, or further limits on administrative growth at the state level. Supermajorities amplify this further by reducing the power of the governor’s veto or minority procedural tools. The judicial shifts of the past few years (and the shadow-docket practice of often allowing executive actions to proceed while litigation continues) have already moved the federal-state balance. The 2026 results will lock in which states can actually use the extra room. A wave that produces several new Democratic trifectas creates more laboratories of resistance or alternative policy; a Republican hold or gain does the reverse. Either way, the importance of those state outcomes rises as the national administrative apparatus is thinner and more constrained.