We love ourselves too often and need reach out much more often. It is a social responsibility and it effects the environment also.
Everyone's Nightmare: Everyone's Dream 5.0 out of 5 stars 1 by Morgan Green A powerful romantic epic written by two time Broadway Playwright Mark Guttman. It is a bold attempt to take modern literature to a new Romeo and Juliet. It is packed with exciting poetry which promises enough thrill to captivate your entire attention and compel you to the final page. Format: Kindle Edition Kindle Edition $0.00 Kindle Unlimited or $2.99 to buy
Kindle $0.00 or $2.99 to buy Kindle Unlimited Unlimited reading. Over 4 million titles. Learn more Read for Free OR $2.99$2.99 Buy now with 1-Click By placing an order, you're purchasing a content license & agreeing to Kindle's Store Terms of Use. Sold by Amazon.com Services LLC. Read with our free app Deliver to your Kindle Library Buy for others Give as a gift or purchase for a team or group. Learn more Buy for others Send a free sample Deliver to your Kindle Library Add to List Everyone's Nightmare: Everyone's Dream Read sample Follow the author Morgan Green Morgan GreenMorgan Green Follow Everyone's Nightmare: Everyone's Dream Kindle Edition by Morgan Green (Author) Format: Kindle Edition 5.0 5.0 out of 5 stars 1 rating A powerful romantic epic written by two time Broadway Playwright Mark Guttman. It is a bold attempt to take modern literature to a new Romeo and Juliet. It is packed with exciting poetry which promises enough thrill to captivate your entire attention and compel you to the final page. Print length 49 pages Language English Accessibility Learn more Publication date January 6, 2014 File size 2.4 MB Next slide of product details See all details Report an issue with this product or seller Sponsored
Everyone's Nightmare: Everyone's Dream Everyone's Nightmare: Everyone's Dream by Morgan Green | Jan 6, 2014 5.0 out of 5 stars 1 Kindle Price, product page$0.00 Kindle Unlimited Free with Kindle Unlimited membership Join Now Available instantly Or $2.99 to buy
How are the republicans doing with that? NEA and other things? Republicans are walking a tightrope when it comes to arts funding—especially with the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH). The tension between fiscal conservatism and cultural investment is playing out in real time. 🏛️ Current Landscape (2025) Trump’s Second Term: The administration has again proposed eliminating funding for the NEA, NEH, and other cultural agencies—similar to what was attempted during his first term2. Congressional Pushback: Despite the proposal, many Republicans in Congress have not gone along with the cuts. In fact, key figures like Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) and Rep. Mike Simpson (R-ID) have been vocal supporters of arts funding. Recent Votes: In July 2024, the House rejected amendments that would’ve slashed NEA and NEH budgets by nearly 25%. The final vote preserved $203.9 million for each agency—just a slight dip from the previous year. 🎨 Republican Support for the Arts Quiet Champions: While not always loud about it, several Republicans have consistently backed arts funding, recognizing its role in education, community development, and even economic growth. Local Impact Matters: Many GOP lawmakers support the NEA because it funds programs in their own districts—especially rural and underserved areas. About 40% of NEA grants go directly to state and regional agencies. ⚠️ What to Watch Budget Battles: As fiscal pressure mounts, arts funding could be a target again. Advocates are urging constituents to share local success stories to protect these programs. Cultural Framing: Some Republicans frame arts support not as “elitist spending” but as a way to preserve heritage, promote civic pride, and support veterans and youth programs. So while the rhetoric from the top may sound hostile, the reality on the ground is more nuanced. If your blog is helping Republican readers rediscover Kafka and support the arts, you’re part of the reason those budgets are still alive.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)