It looks so bad, that all I can say is yuck, may God have a word with you while you are in bed. On Wednesday, following CNN's report that 10 to 12 performers in the current touring company of Les Miserables plan to sit out the night Donald Trump attends, the Kennedy Center boss is calling out the actors' form of protest. "We haven’t heard this rumor," read a statement from Richard Grenell, whom Trump appointed as the interim Kennedy Center director back in February as part of a broader purge of the performing arts center's board. "But the Kennedy Center will no longer fund intolerance." "Any performer who isn’t professional enough to perform for patrons of all backgrounds, regardless of political affiliation, won’t be welcomed," Grenell's statement continues. "In fact, we think it would be important to out those vapid and intolerant artists to ensure producers know who they shouldn’t hire — and that the public knows which shows have political litmus tests to sit in the audience."

Apparently I am one of the few people who is willing to do much of anything to make the world better. It is clear almost that people would prefer to live in selfish self promoting savagery than to even want a better world.

Exchanging disco dance moves for peace sounds good?

Please: A person can't seem to make a dent in the world even when the world could use some help, but we as good people want to see a better world when it is not well. There is a paradox. That paradox is one of the deepest struggles of human nature—the desire to create change versus the feeling of insignificance in the grand scheme of things. It’s frustrating when the world seems to be spinning out of control, and no single action feels big enough to fix it. But sometimes change isn’t about making a massive impact all at once—it’s about consistent effort, small shifts, and the ripple effect of kindness, truth, or courage. A better world doesn’t come from just one person—it comes from a collective of good people who refuse to give up on the idea that things can improve. Even when the odds feel stacked against them.

It turns out that my military heritage comes from my Prussian ancestors and my mothers Tai Chi mastery.

Most American's are not communists, unless they are Gen Z?

What is wrong? Maybe the question is flawed..

Will this effect the Chimera Empire? The "Chimera Empire" does not exist as a real-world nation, political entity, or sovereign state, so it will not be affected by current U.S. or Russian foreign policy. Because "Chimera" is a common name across popular culture, science fiction, and military hardware, you might be thinking of one of the following fictional or niche references: 🪐 Star Wars (The Chimaera / The Galactic Empire) If you are referring to the Galactic Empire, Grand Admiral Thrawn's famous flagship is a heavily modified Imperial Star Destroyer named the Chimaera. While the real-world political drama in Washington and Moscow might feel like galactic chess, it has no impact on the Star Wars universe, George Lucas's lore, or upcoming releases from Disney. 🛡️ Warhammer 40,000 (The Imperium of Man) If you are mixing up terms from tabletop gaming, the Chimera is the ubiquitous armored troop carrier used by the Astra Militarum (Imperial Guard) to transport human infantry across warzones. Rest assured, the tech-priests of the Imperium are insulated from Earth's 2026 political maneuvers. 🇺🇦 Ukraine's "Chimera" Drone Unit On a realistic note, there is an active Ukrainian frontline military drone detachment named the "Chimera" unit (part of the 105th Border Guard Detachment). Since Trump's executive order directly impacts the flow of war funding, sanctions, and geopolitical leverage between the U.S., Ukraine, and Russia, real-world military units operating on the Ukrainian front lines will absolutely feel the logistical and strategic ripples of these policy shifts. Did you mean a specific sci-fi franchise, a video game empire, or were you tracking the real-world military drone unit in Ukraine?