Upliftingthoughts.org songs of the day

MIGHTY MOUSE MAN IN YOUR PANTS

WHY DO BAVIES SCREAM SO LOUD

DOES A BEARD MAKE ALL THE DIFFERENCE OH YEA

WE ARE LIVINNG IN A WORLD OF FOOD

DON'T STOP TILL YOU TOUCH THE MOON

WHAT EVER WILL BE WILL BREATH


Posted by at

There a difference between falling for a woman and falling onto a woman..

Usually involving a trick known as a trip, and end result may indeed be trippy though.
Posted by at

Why I want to quit caffeine..

I have used it a lot in the last year so I want a new perspective.

So what drug now:

A bit of sugar, more excerize, more naps.

Join the club!
Posted by at

Seeing rabid wrong doing and still no vomit?


Posted by at

A super jew power I got in Egypt is I can send frogs against people I don't like.

Toads were not mentioned, but I think frogs can put the damage on!
Posted by at

Dashing it was...

Then I watched the time

To fall into a clock

Into a whales heart

A test of characters

Breasts is fine

She is herself

The showers drop their rain

There is no pain

Rivers roll across the plains

Breasts was warm

A rainbow formed

Another day of work and play

The chess is on the cement

Pawns EVERYWHERE.
Posted by at

My favorite Science Project.

More Telescopes.
Posted by at

An introduction to breasts

Is a book title you can't use unless it is my character, Breasts herself, the one and only!
Posted by at

Suddenly the sky parted like two giant breasts..

It was going to be a good day

She gave me a high five

Suddenly she was ready to drive

The rods were moving in her eyes

In fact she was made of Pi

Everything is going to be alright

On this magic carpet ride

Face full of whip cream

Life is just a waking dream.
Posted by at

With a wish

With a hand on bun

HOT CROSS BUNS

For very cross

For very crass

Improved recipe

For a cute puppy

A tiny canary

And giant LIPS

MERRY CHRISTMAS

Best wishes.
Posted by at

Not sure why,

But two of my blog's traffic show a bit of recognition for my poetry.  This is a first.
Posted by at
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Is this a valuable chunk: Bottom line Your intuition matches a real interpretive layer of relativity: spacetime can be treated as a complete whole rather than a flowing process But it goes beyond current physics to say: that whole structure implies simple, fixed determinism of all events That middle gap—between geometry and outcomes—is exactly where modern theoretical physics is still incomplete. Yes — it’s a valuable chunk, but with some important caveats about how valuable and for what purpose. Why it is valuable That passage correctly captures a real distinction in modern general relativity: spacetime can be modeled as a complete 4D geometric structure (the “block” interpretation) but that does not automatically mean every event is simply “fixed deterministically” in the intuitive sense And it correctly identifies a real frontier issue: how spacetime geometry and physical outcome rules fit together at a deeper level That is an actual research gap in theoretical physics (especially when trying to unify gravity with microscopic physics in cosmology-level models). Why it needs tightening There are two places where it becomes slightly misleading: 1) “Interpretive layer of relativity” That’s fine, but it should be clearer that: the “block universe” is an interpretation, not a direct experimental prediction of relativity Relativity itself only gives: a geometric structure of spacetime not a claim about “flow” or “non-flow” of time. 2) “That implies simple fixed determinism” This is the delicate part. Even in a block-style spacetime: the global structure can exist without implying simple, classical determinism of all events Because outcome rules can still be: probabilistic locally (in modern physics descriptions) or constrained but not uniquely fixed by initial conditions alone So the implication you wrote is stronger than what physics requires. Why the “middle gap” line is actually strong This part is genuinely solid: “That middle gap—between geometry and outcomes—is where modern theoretical physics is incomplete.” That is accurate in spirit because: we do not yet have a fully unified description of spacetime + microscopic dynamics the interface between geometry and physical “events” is still an open problem in fundamental theory This is one of the motivations behind attempts at quantum gravity. Bottom line (refined evaluation) ✔ Good conceptual clarity ✔ Correctly distinguishes interpretation vs theory ✔ Correctly identifies a real unresolved frontier ⚠ Slight overstatement about determinism being implied If you wanted a sharper version A more precise rewrite would be: Spacetime in relativity can be modeled as a complete 4D structure, rather than a flowing process. However, this geometric view does not by itself determine how physical events are realized within that structure. The relationship between spacetime geometry and the rules governing outcomes remains an open problem in modern theoretical physics.