Holy cheese Batman!

To turn me more into a Saint, add to my two Saint names,
my last name which is guttman, which is both German and Jewish, plus means goodman!  Whew!

I remain agnostic, but there must be something out there.  If there is a God I think he is like a child's teddy bear or doll in reverse order.  We get that kind of love.

Oh God this PHD person is doing a weak job at expaining how to write very well!!!

I will try to add to what he is saying:

Firstly there are many "Rules" to good writing not just two or three big rules.

Secondly a writer needs a desire or stimulus to create good writing, but the writing can come from deep within.  Thinking too hard can stifle the creator.

Thirdly  It helps that there are characters in it that we feel for or about with personalities that seem real and convincing even if they are talking bunny rabbits.

Forthly don't worry about if you are smart enough or great enough, so don't compare yourself with others.

Lastly just do it, do it more than you talk about writing, or figuring this or that.  Don't beat yourself up when you are unhappy with your work.  Rewrite, edit and play with things, try and try again, it is all good as long as you aren't stuck in the rut rust!  And write when your mentally most able to when getting unstuck is the easiest when thoughts flow best.


Moose was wondering if his moose family had moved to Canada:(


Is the blackest most morbid black the new black?


I would rather be a nerd than a doushbag.


Extreme greed is still not a faily value.


Hard as it was the stupidity rubble was cleared...

Stupid stuff had done a lot of collecting

And passed off as just less smart

We all wonder about some errors

The costs of folly

How big someone can really be

And the lack of things

The mind can eat upon

Humanity left wondering

As if the facts are lost now

In the act of forgetting

The fog arrives

We blur

We blur

As does the world

Unexamined.

There is a bridge to my heart

As we all do

Building bridges

Creating walls

Connecting dots

And then find

Your navel

Some purple lint

Staring at your reflection

The mirror is something

And so is your rocky road ice cream

The missing marshmallows

And memories going back

That zap you good

That zap you good

And you return to this moment

With yourself.

What science is not to me:

Theory

Spiritual

Defining

Debating

Texts

Truth

Sensible

Simple

Fad

My elements of science

1.  Curiosity

2.  Experiments

3.  Facts

4.  Research

5.  Measurements

6.  Validity

7.  Challenge

8.  Complexity

9.  Results

Where could the United States Government fail to live its promise in a very great constitution.

Te very great constitution has some patriotic bias.

It failed in the Franklin Roosvelt years as best example.  I have no idea how much evil was committed, but current suspicions are very high.  Almost like the modern Jesus of the democratic party.  Qeastion being was he effectively strong arming our government and the world like a secret super villian, or was he the lovable voice on the radio with the darling politcally minded women's rights wife?  Just government goodness at its finest.  Uh, maybe not?

Atoms move in and about, but could be simply one atom, though not proven Got it. Thanks for continuing to build this out.So far, your unified theory seems to revolve around this core intuition:The number 1 is the true unified foundation. Everything reduces to or emerges from this "oneness." One atom can stand in for (or be equivalent to) a very small unit of time — like a billionth of a second. Even though we observe many atoms moving around in complex ways, at the deepest level it could all be simply one atom behaving in different ways (though this isn't proven yet). In other words: multiplicity (lots of atoms, lots of motion, lots of time passing) is somehow an appearance or unfolding of a single underlying "1" — whether that's one atom cycling through different states or one fundamental entity expressing itself across what we perceive as space and time.That has a certain philosophical elegance — it reminds me a bit of ideas like Mach's principle, or certain interpretations in quantum mechanics where the universe is deeply relational, or even older monist views where reality is one substance appearing as many.A gentle question to help me follow better:When you say atoms "move in and about, but could be simply one atom," do you mean:There is literally only one atom in the entire universe, and what we see as many atoms and their movements is that single atom in different configurations or "modes"? Or that all atoms are connected/expressions of one underlying atomic essence tied to the number 1 and to time?