Breath in love

Hate is an awful song

In f major.
Posted by at No comments:

You got to know when...

It is love

The open wound

There in the dark

A light flashed

Lighting in your eyes

We can see

The winds colide

Lights arrive

It is love

Queen of the sea

She held herself

Queen of the sea

As the window flew

As the the glass shattered

The bridge came into view

Queen of the sea

Dreams flash.
Posted by at No comments:
It is the madness of life

Tripping us again and again

Become empty at times

Disconnecting with stage freight

The stage gets teeth

Then we worry

Yet the place of heaven is simple

Being blessed to be people

We are free

The thespian thing tumbles

While the cats learn.Tee
Posted by at No comments:

Underground horse.

The cave glowed

A pale blue light

And it guided me down

Deep underground

Where she was

Or perhaps she wasn't

But the painting by Chagall

Was saying something

In a whisper hard to hear

She said hi.
Posted by at No comments:

I say a child with a peace and love shirt.

SHE SEEMED TO BE SADLY LOOKING AT THE ADULTS NEARBY AS IF TO SAY COULD YOU PLEASE STOP THE HATE.

Posted by at No comments:

I try not to give unsolicited advise or crazy sounding opinions.


Posted by at No comments:

I must confess

Seems like the the muse of the past is maybe gone

It used to be a she

Not sure it's a she now

I'm sure it's a dude now

What kind of dude

Hmmmm

I just know he's got big eyes

Yet he prefers sleeping.

Posted by at No comments:

What ever life is:

It is not lame.
Posted by at No comments:

The time masters

Again Saturday I face the weekend

The time Lords from way back were the Catholics

Today five days where work and commerce can be oppressive

Week ends are not just fun times but recovery times

Then Sunday the quite and religious activity are another oppressor

It is not so bad really

There is a lot to be grateful about

But the deal may not be so sweet

As it seems

Because sometimes at midnight

You can almost hear the drunken screams:

It's carnival!

It's carnival!

And a scary pill is dropped in a woman's drink...
Posted by at No comments:

I found one place of hope.

And there seems to be lots of dream killers amuck and for decades.
Posted by at No comments:

Angels at it again?

It's possible.

I think there are even some Christmas ducks around.

If Angels are coming again and my radar picks them up you'll know.

But this full moon seems utterly mysterious,

And I'm not talking about cows or lunatics okay?
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

So its appealing by itself for now? Yes, it is appealing as an idea to explore because it touches a very deep and recurring theme: how structure, organization, and relationships emerge from a state of possibility. The appeal comes from the simplicity of the symbolism: 0→1→2→complexity It captures an intuitive story: a lack of distinction, the emergence of unity, the appearance of difference, and then the growth of relationships and patterns. That kind of simplicity is often what makes ideas worth investigating. Many powerful mathematical ideas begin with a pattern that feels fundamental before the formal machinery is developed. At the same time, its appeal and its scientific status are different things. Right now, 0!=1 in the way you are using it is best viewed as a conceptual framework or metaphorical organizing principle, not a demonstrated physical law. The next step, if one wanted to develop it, would be to see whether it can generate precise mathematics or predictions. But as a piece of conceptual thinking, yes—the focus on unity as an organizing principle is a genuinely interesting question. It asks something very fundamental: Why does reality contain coherent structures at all? That question has been at the heart of mathematics and physics for a long time. It could help in determining when polarities are possible Yes, that is one of the more interesting ways to frame it. If your idea were developed mathematically, it could be viewed as asking: Under what conditions can a system move from a unified state into a state with distinguishable opposites or polarities? In existing science, this question appears in several forms: Symmetry breaking: A system may begin with many equivalent possibilities, then settle into a state where distinctions appear. For example, a magnet can have a preferred direction even though the underlying laws are symmetric. Phase transitions: A system can change from one type of organization to another when conditions cross a threshold. Bifurcations in dynamical systems: A small change in conditions can cause a system to split into different possible behaviors. A mathematical version of your question might be: When does a unified state become unstable and allow two or more distinct states? The "polarity" would not necessarily mean good/bad or opposite forces in a philosophical sense. It could simply mean two distinguishable states that are related by a rule. For example: 1→(+1,−1) could represent the emergence of a pair of complementary possibilities. The challenge would be defining what triggers that transition: an energy threshold? a symmetry condition? an information constraint? a mathematical instability? That is actually where your focus on 1 becomes useful. Rather than starting with the opposites, you are asking about the origin of the conditions that allow opposites to exist at all. A rigorous version of the idea would need to specify a mathematical system where: a unified state exists, a polarity can emerge, the transition point can be calculated. That would put it in conversation with existing work on symmetry, phase transitions, and emergent structures. Could you simplify this for my small human mind Absolutely. The simple version is: You are asking: How does one thing become two things? Imagine a perfectly calm, undivided situation. There is no difference, no "this side" and "that side." Then something changes, and a difference appears: 1→+1 and −1 Now there is a relationship. There is a "push" and a "pull," a direction, a pattern. A simple example: A perfectly balanced pencil standing on its tip has no chosen direction. A tiny disturbance happens. It falls one way or the other. A difference appears. The important part is not the two directions themselves. It is the moment when a difference becomes possible. Your idea with 0!=1 seems to be asking: Is there a basic mathematical rule that explains how a state of pure possibility becomes a real, organized state? Then the next question is: Once a "one" exists, when and why can it split into a "two"? That split is where polarity appears. In very simple terms: potential→unity→polarity→complexity You are not really asking about numbers. You are asking about the birth of differences and relationships. That is a big question. It is the kind of question that sits underneath ideas like symmetry breaking, the formation of structures in the universe, and how complexity arises. Your intuition is trying to find the "first step" where the universe goes from one possible state into many possible states.