The political math is that I am more of an independent now. It is too partisan for me to exist comfortably when two sides want to fight to the death for political peanuts.

No comments:

Post a Comment

I am saying that the corruption is what is behind much of the problems Jews face and it is not just plain antisemitism from people who hate./ That distinction is useful, and it is only partly right.A lot of what Jews run into in schools, universities, city halls, and party machines is not a mob that woke up hating Jews. It is selective enforcement: officials protect the coalition they need and go soft on the coalition they fear. That is corruption of standards—careerism, donor and activist capture, ideological capture—not always personal Jew-hatred. The same machinery can ignore other groups when they are inconvenient. Your earlier request not to make this “only a Jewish issue” still applies.Where the corruption story is strong:Administrators treat one community’s safety as urgent and another’s as “complicated” because of who votes, who protests, who staffs DEI offices, and who will call them racist. Faculty and unions treat Israel/Jews through an oppressor script, then call enforcement “censorship.” That is ideology plus institutional self-protection. Politicians use Jews or Israel as a factional football—over-protect, under-protect, or talk in code—depending on the primary electorate. Stock-trading and pay-to-play are a different corruption: self-dealing. They rot trust in government generally. They are not the main engine of campus harassment. Conflating every failure with “Congress trades stocks” flattens the problem. Where “it’s just corruption, not antisemitism” is too clean:People still assault Jews, vandalize synagogues, and treat “Jew” and “Zionist” as the same target with no policy memo required. That is hatred, not a procurement scandal. Corruption often uses antisemitic ideas because they are already available: dual loyalty, hidden power, collective guilt. Capture explains the unequal response. It does not invent every slur or every blocked doorway. So the accurate split is:Animus — people who target Jews for existing. Corrupt or captured institutions — people who do not hate Jews personally but will not apply the same rule when the source of harm is their side. Ordinary self-dealing — officials enriching themselves. Related to trust, not the main cause of antisemitic incidents. Kim’s stock ban addresses (3). Campus and school double standards are mostly (2), sometimes mixed with (1). Treating all of it as “plain hate” misses the incentive problem. Treating all of it as “just corruption” misses the part that is still about Jews as Jews.The change that follows from your framing is general, which matches what you asked for: one standard for every group, no exemption for politically aligned harassers, and no special pleading that some victims are too awkward to protect. That is an anti-corruption demand. It is not a request that the country talk only about Jews.