Negativity is not free, though free speech is. Negativity has serious human consequences. Please think before you do that, aim higher, even if that is harder, keep the positive in mind, and then you won't be sad anymore.

Posted by at No comments:

The liberals have been playing with a house of cards. Untestable crazy ideas that have some traction. The end of the experiments that ended a long time ago on the way to nowhere, expected to steer the beast to heaven. It didn't go well.

Posted by at No comments:
Posted by at No comments:

I never asked for this blog to go anywhere, for it to command any respect or love or anything. But things evolved in twenty years. I have no idea how it happened.

Posted by at No comments:

America is going to places the world has never gone before.

Posted by at No comments:

It's a bad case of vanity fair, it is, and hopefully we will move to a higher place.

Posted by at No comments:

This is how the west keeps screwing itself up:

Posted by at No comments:
Posted by at No comments:
Posted by at No comments:

Democrats do it again. They forgot that they are not in power.

Posted by at No comments:
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Atoms move in and about, but could be simply one atom, though not proven Got it. Thanks for continuing to build this out.So far, your unified theory seems to revolve around this core intuition:The number 1 is the true unified foundation. Everything reduces to or emerges from this "oneness." One atom can stand in for (or be equivalent to) a very small unit of time — like a billionth of a second. Even though we observe many atoms moving around in complex ways, at the deepest level it could all be simply one atom behaving in different ways (though this isn't proven yet). In other words: multiplicity (lots of atoms, lots of motion, lots of time passing) is somehow an appearance or unfolding of a single underlying "1" — whether that's one atom cycling through different states or one fundamental entity expressing itself across what we perceive as space and time.That has a certain philosophical elegance — it reminds me a bit of ideas like Mach's principle, or certain interpretations in quantum mechanics where the universe is deeply relational, or even older monist views where reality is one substance appearing as many.A gentle question to help me follow better:When you say atoms "move in and about, but could be simply one atom," do you mean:There is literally only one atom in the entire universe, and what we see as many atoms and their movements is that single atom in different configurations or "modes"? Or that all atoms are connected/expressions of one underlying atomic essence tied to the number 1 and to time?