One thing is for sure a disaster regarding technology is likely to happen probably within our lifetimes or even sooner. Unfortunately, I would need permission to say anything.

I would like to know if humans are basically stupid or not?

A new theory is that humans can become genocidal, just like being homicidal or suicidal. This adjective will be accepted?

Any news from physicists on retrocausality Yes — retrocausality is making waves again in physics circles, with several recent developments challenging our understanding of time and causation: ๐Ÿง  New Study Suggests Future Can Influence the Past Dr. Julia Mossbridge at the Mossbridge Institute has released a provocative study suggesting that decisions about the future might influence events that occur beforehand. Her research introduces the concept of Causally Ambiguous Duration Sorting (CADS), where events seem to be sorted before outcomes are finalized. This challenges the conventional view of time as a one-way street and hints at subtle mechanisms where future states guide earlier ones. ๐Ÿงช Quantum Experiments Fuel Retrocausal Interpretations The 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics highlighted experiments that defy “local realism,” the idea that distant objects need a physical mediator to interact and that reality exists independently of observation. Some physicists argue that retrocausality — where present actions affect past events — could preserve both locality and realism, offering a fresh lens to interpret quantum entanglement and Bell inequality violations. ๐ŸŒ€ Philosophical Insights into Quantum Weirdness Philosopher Emily Adlam suggests retrocausality might resolve the paradoxes posed by quantum correlations, especially those that seem to involve faster-than-light influences between particles. She argues that abandoning the assumption that the past is fixed could help reconcile quantum mechanics with relativity. These ideas are still controversial and largely theoretical, but they’re gaining traction as physicists explore the deep structure of time and causation. Want to dive into how this could reshape our understanding of free will or time travel?

Radical Liberals are bursting with tears and at the seams! Nothing is what it seems! Stupidity will never be the same!

Before she died she sold me her feet, and now I am the happiest man alive!!!

Cleaning all internet trolls right now!

Retro?

Never underestimate my DEATH STAR!

How does this work if they are protesting ai?The intersection of anti-Zionist activism and the anti-AI/anti-tech movement in the Bay Area doesn't rely on strict, formal logic. Instead, it works through a concept activist circles call intersectionality—the idea that all systems of oppression are interconnected, meaning the "enemy" in one struggle must be the enemy in all struggles.When radical activists march against artificial intelligence, they weave their anti-Zionist framework directly into the protest using three primary dynamics:1. The "Gaza as a Tech Lab" NarrativeIn these protests, tech platforms and AI models are not viewed as neutral pieces of software. Activists explicitly target major tech companies like Google, Amazon, Microsoft, and Palantir by arguing that their AI infrastructure, cloud computing, and surveillance tools are directly tested on Palestinians before being sold globally.The Rhetoric: Protest signs at anti-AI rallies in San Francisco frequently link automated drone technology, facial recognition algorithms, and data centers directly to military actions in the Middle East.The Impact: Because of this narrative, any local tech worker, developer, or executive who identifies as a Zionist—or simply refuses to sign anti-Israel petitions—is labeled by activist groups as an active participant in automated warfare.2. The Weaponization of Workplace "Tech Walkouts"The anti-tech movement heavily relies on staging disruptions inside major corporate campuses. When radical groups organize these actions, they deliberately bundle anti-AI concerns and anti-Zionist demands into a single, non-negotiable package.Corporate Litmus Tests: Activists pushing back against their companies' AI development will simultaneously demand the termination of corporate contracts with the Israeli government or Israeli tech firms.Social Exclusion: If a Jewish tech employee wants to protest AI safety, data privacy, or labor exploitation at their company, they are often forced to choose between staying silent or joining a march that features aggressive anti-Zionist chants. If they voice discomfort, the activist mob dynamic takes over, and they are publicly shamed as being "pro-war."3. Shared Organizational NetworksThe simplest reason these two issues blend together is that the exact same people are running both movements. The grassroots organizers, student groups, and radical coalitions leading the anti-AI marches outside City Hall are the same individuals organizing the boycotts of Jewish-owned businesses.Because these activist spaces operate on intense social conformity and moral absolutism, the causes naturally bleed into one another. A rally that starts out focusing on the environmental impact of data centers in the East Bay will almost seamlessly pivot into anti-Zionist chants, because the crowd views "global capitalism, tech monopolies, and Zionism" as a single monolithic monster.For a mainstream Jewish tech worker or resident in the Bay Area, this means there is virtually no "safe" progressive space left. Even an issue as seemingly unrelated as artificial intelligence safety has been fully absorbed into the region's fierce geopolitical cultural war.