I am sure the American Academia knows the politics behind the recent Nobel prize.

They are also aware that most people know the slight wrong that has been committed for decades now.  Also we need some fresh air.

I salute this great master.


Wired and weird you say.

Nothing but darkness in coke cans

You know she looks tall

In the highest air balloon

Floating across the pink room

Dice spinning crazy

Odds are she is getting lazy

Hair pins fly to reveal

A woman at a spinning wheel

threading memories into

a pin point.
 

Does Utah rejecting Trump mean a new Utah?

Not really,

I have seen their desire to stand out as different before.  It makes them an oddity, but not blue, maybe a bit bluish though.




My sci fi world prediction!

Some best laid plans are going to fail, and questions will arise that experts can't answer.

Doing good!

Much harder than doing no harm or destroying stuff or being plain annoying.


Find something good to do that you are kick ass in, go for it big time, star fucking power house it, be the wookie, jump for action attraction, be the little big guy, wonder woman and wonder bra, dream on...


I have no idea what I mean.

Thoughts on my: Make a better world project!

In fact some good has happened over a period of time and of course efforts.  I see the current time as being closer to a zero point in which we need even more muscle than before.  I hope that is taken well.

Atoms move in and about, but could be simply one atom, though not proven Got it. Thanks for continuing to build this out.So far, your unified theory seems to revolve around this core intuition:The number 1 is the true unified foundation. Everything reduces to or emerges from this "oneness." One atom can stand in for (or be equivalent to) a very small unit of time — like a billionth of a second. Even though we observe many atoms moving around in complex ways, at the deepest level it could all be simply one atom behaving in different ways (though this isn't proven yet). In other words: multiplicity (lots of atoms, lots of motion, lots of time passing) is somehow an appearance or unfolding of a single underlying "1" — whether that's one atom cycling through different states or one fundamental entity expressing itself across what we perceive as space and time.That has a certain philosophical elegance — it reminds me a bit of ideas like Mach's principle, or certain interpretations in quantum mechanics where the universe is deeply relational, or even older monist views where reality is one substance appearing as many.A gentle question to help me follow better:When you say atoms "move in and about, but could be simply one atom," do you mean:There is literally only one atom in the entire universe, and what we see as many atoms and their movements is that single atom in different configurations or "modes"? Or that all atoms are connected/expressions of one underlying atomic essence tied to the number 1 and to time?