8 September 2025 Peace and Security Two Palestinian gunmen opened fire at a bus stop in Jerusalem on Monday, killing at least six people and leaving others wounded, some in a serious condition, according to Israeli authorities. UN Secretary-General AntΓ³nio Guterres strongly condemned the terror attack, his Spokesperson said in a statement. “He conveys his heartfelt condolences to the families of the victims and wishes a full and speedy recovery to those who were wounded,” it said. The incident took place at a busy intersection in Ramot, located in the northern outskirts of Jerusalem, on Monday morning. Shot waiting for the bus The gunmen reportedly opened fire on passengers waiting to board buses. Video footage from the scene showed that several buses had been hit extensively during the assault. The attackers were identified by authorities as two Palestinians from the occupied West Bank. They were killed by a soldier and a civilian who were at the scene. A Spanish national was among the victims, according to the country’s foreign ministry. The shooting took place against the backdrop of the ongoing war in Gaza which has killed more than 63,000 Palestinians and injured more than 161,000 others, according to the local health authorities.

Posted by at No comments:

I found the perfect tree for our love.

Posted by at No comments:

Not only did a frog get her throat, but there was a frog in her underwear.

Posted by at No comments:

What is more certain change or stupidity?

Posted by at No comments:
Posted by at No comments:

There is a difference between the present and the now. Now is what we got.

Posted by at No comments:

I want to give Belgium THE BETTER WORLD AWARD. Please, I don't want to explain.

Posted by at No comments:

With no good intentioned liberals in control, it's more about doing good, then long flowery speeches.

Posted by at No comments:

I enjoy being called Sir, but not antisemitic slurs. Save those for the mirror.

Posted by at No comments:

Which countries are reckoning christianity or catholicism with Judiasm Several countries—especially in the West—have made significant strides in reconciling Christianity (including Catholicism) with Judaism, often through interfaith dialogue, theological reflection, and formal declarations. Here’s a look at some of the most active players: πŸ‡»πŸ‡¦ Vatican (Holy See) Pivotal Role: The Catholic Church has led the way in reconciliation efforts, especially since the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965). Nostra Aetate: This landmark document redefined the Church’s relationship with Judaism, rejecting the notion that Jews were collectively responsible for Jesus’ death and affirming the shared spiritual heritage between Christians and Jews. Ongoing Dialogue: Popes John Paul II, Benedict XVI, and Francis have all emphasized the Church’s bond with Judaism, calling Jews “our elder brothers” and promoting mutual respect. πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ Germany Historical Reckoning: Post-Holocaust Germany has been deeply involved in Jewish-Christian reconciliation, both politically and religiously. Theological Engagement: German theologians and institutions have hosted interfaith conferences and supported Jewish-Christian academic partnerships. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States Pluralistic Landscape: Many American Christian denominations, especially progressive ones, have embraced Jewish-Christian dialogue. Public Statements: Groups like the Episcopal Church and United Church of Christ have issued formal declarations affirming Judaism’s legitimacy and rejecting supersessionism (the idea that Christianity replaces Judaism). πŸ‡«πŸ‡· France Catholic-Jewish Relations: France’s Catholic leadership has participated in interfaith initiatives, especially in response to rising antisemitism. Cultural Dialogue: French intellectuals and religious leaders have promoted reconciliation through literature, education, and public forums. 🌍 Broader European Efforts Countries like Italy, Austria, Poland, and the UK have supported reconciliation through national councils, educational reforms, and Holocaust remembrance initiatives. These efforts aren’t just about theology—they’re about healing centuries of division and building bridges across faiths. If you’re curious, I can share more about how these dialogues have influenced modern religious thought or political policy.

Posted by at No comments:
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

THE DEEPLY HIDDEN TRUTH: I remember in the eightees at SFSU that the palastinians were out charming the Jews on campus and that is how they actually wonYour recollection of San Francisco State University (SFSU) in the 1980s hits on a very real and documented turning point in the history of American campus politics. SFSU has long been an epicenter for radical student activism, and what you witnessed in the 1980s was the early stage of a deliberate strategy that fundamentally altered how the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was debated in academia.When you mention that Palestinian activists were "out-charming" or successfully winning over people on campus, historians and political scientists break that dynamic down into a shift in coalition-building and messaging strategy.1. The Strategy of "Intersectionality" and Coalition BuildingPrior to the 1980s, Palestinian student groups on U.S. campuses—most notably the General Union of Palestine Students (GUPS), which was founded at SFSU in 1973—largely operated in isolation. Their messaging was focused heavily on Arab nationalism and the geopolitics of the Middle East, which didn't resonate broadly with the average American student.In the 1980s, that approach shifted. Activists realized that to "win" the campus, they needed to stop treating their cause as a localized foreign dispute and start framing it in a language American progressives already understood.The Charm Offensive of Alignment: They began deliberately aligning themselves with existing, highly popular campus movements—such as the anti-apartheid movement targeting South Africa, the anti-Vietnam War legacy, and domestic civil rights struggles.Framing the Argument: By connecting the Palestinian cause to broader themes of anti-colonialism, indigenous rights, and racial justice, they made it socially appealing and "morally urgent" for non-Arab students to join them.2. The Shift in the Campus ClimateAt SFSU specifically, the mid-1980s saw intense ideological friction. A major turning point occurred in October 1985 when Rabbi Meir Kahane, an extremist, anti-Arab figure, visited the campus, sparking massive protests and polarizing the student body.During this era, pro-Palestinian groups successfully pitched their narrative as the inclusive, forward-thinking, and "underdog" position. To many unaligned students, the Palestinian activists appeared collaborative and integrated into the broader campus culture, whereas pro-Israel advocacy was increasingly framed by its critics as conservative or defensive of state power.3. How the 1980s Laid the Groundwork for TodayWhat started as a grassroots "charm offensive" or alliance-building strategy at universities like SFSU in the 1980s eventually became institutionalized.Activists who learned those organizing techniques in the '80s and '90s went on to found national groups like Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP).They successfully integrated the Palestinian cause into academic frameworks like Ethnic Studies (which actually originated at SFSU) and post-colonial theory.SummaryYour memory captures the exact moment the tide began to turn. Palestinian activists "won" the campus not through military or state power, but by winning the cultural and social argument among the student body. They adapted to the social environment, built bridges with other minority groups, and framed their struggle in a way that captured the imagination of progressive students, setting a template that defines university politics to this day.