I hope big reality shifting color altering mechanic virtual reality helmets are designed!


Posted by at

During the 1940s (exact date?) The Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court killed a senator in a duel in Daly City!

That was the last legal duel in California!

Now that's a wild story plus you can find the exact spots where they shot at each other!

Go to West Lake and head to Lake Merced where a small park is!

The fight spots have plaques!
Posted by at

Strange how love forms by drugged out demon possessed complaining and gossiping!

I can't understand it!
Posted by at

I just listenef to some verbal exchanges between a cat and a baby as if they could talk to each other!

Trippy stuff!
Posted by at

If Donald is elected we have a right to know his thoughts on SPACE!


Posted by at

I am very serious about not confusing my thoughts with science,

This makes science a kind of intense lightening experience..

The framework of reality is bent and hiding

Like hitting an invisible person

Yes that is weird

Science goes deeper

Just scratch the surface of science and wham!!!
Posted by at

William Blake is to be given some attention on my Blogs soon!

I found his use of poetic language the best as far as telling the non poet that poetry is not to be sneezed at.

The issue of a non poet is really modern, as Ernest Hemmingway James Joyce and Thomas Hardy were living between poetry and prose. 

We forget this and the loss is noticeable.  Ha!
Posted by at

Get to know Lewis Carrol's influences a bit.

A fragment:

I urged "You're wasting time, you know:
     Delay will spoil the venison."
"My heart is wasted with my woe!
     There is no rest--in Venice, on
The Bridge of Sighs!" she quoted low
      From Byron and from Tennyson.

 
Posted by at

I am community oriented!

I am not looking for one person and thinking that is perfect!

Not me at all!

Community is essential as a significant other!
Posted by at

Fun in Chico:


MARK GUTMAN - Duration: 10:00

Posted by at

America seems to find its lack of mental health funny and why not?


Posted by at
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Is this a valuable chunk: Bottom line Your intuition matches a real interpretive layer of relativity: spacetime can be treated as a complete whole rather than a flowing process But it goes beyond current physics to say: that whole structure implies simple, fixed determinism of all events That middle gap—between geometry and outcomes—is exactly where modern theoretical physics is still incomplete. Yes — it’s a valuable chunk, but with some important caveats about how valuable and for what purpose. Why it is valuable That passage correctly captures a real distinction in modern general relativity: spacetime can be modeled as a complete 4D geometric structure (the “block” interpretation) but that does not automatically mean every event is simply “fixed deterministically” in the intuitive sense And it correctly identifies a real frontier issue: how spacetime geometry and physical outcome rules fit together at a deeper level That is an actual research gap in theoretical physics (especially when trying to unify gravity with microscopic physics in cosmology-level models). Why it needs tightening There are two places where it becomes slightly misleading: 1) “Interpretive layer of relativity” That’s fine, but it should be clearer that: the “block universe” is an interpretation, not a direct experimental prediction of relativity Relativity itself only gives: a geometric structure of spacetime not a claim about “flow” or “non-flow” of time. 2) “That implies simple fixed determinism” This is the delicate part. Even in a block-style spacetime: the global structure can exist without implying simple, classical determinism of all events Because outcome rules can still be: probabilistic locally (in modern physics descriptions) or constrained but not uniquely fixed by initial conditions alone So the implication you wrote is stronger than what physics requires. Why the “middle gap” line is actually strong This part is genuinely solid: “That middle gap—between geometry and outcomes—is where modern theoretical physics is incomplete.” That is accurate in spirit because: we do not yet have a fully unified description of spacetime + microscopic dynamics the interface between geometry and physical “events” is still an open problem in fundamental theory This is one of the motivations behind attempts at quantum gravity. Bottom line (refined evaluation) ✔ Good conceptual clarity ✔ Correctly distinguishes interpretation vs theory ✔ Correctly identifies a real unresolved frontier ⚠ Slight overstatement about determinism being implied If you wanted a sharper version A more precise rewrite would be: Spacetime in relativity can be modeled as a complete 4D structure, rather than a flowing process. However, this geometric view does not by itself determine how physical events are realized within that structure. The relationship between spacetime geometry and the rules governing outcomes remains an open problem in modern theoretical physics.