There are lies, damn lies, false labels, falser labels, stigmas, bull shit and the advanced bull shit.

And then there are infested slimy mouthed snake people.
Posted by at No comments:

How much of human reality is based on propagated mythology.

The truth might offend most pepple.
Posted by at No comments:

The need of some to explain a mystery is both baffling and disgusting.


Posted by at No comments:

I may really be onto something

HEALTH LINE GIVES 41 POSSIBLE CAUSES OF FEINTENING

 ONE IS TEEN PREGNANCY.

 YEA RIGHT THAT SOUNDS LIKE A GOOD REASON.

AND 40 OTHER BOGUS POSSIBLE REASONS EXIST!!!  

CAN'T IT BE SAID THAT YOU GUYS DON'T KNOW.  IS IT REALLY HARD TO SAY THOSE F ING WORDS   I FIND IT LIBERATING THAT THERE ARE UNEXPLAINED AND UNEXPLANABLE MYSTERIES OUT THERE.  PLUS YOU GUYS WILL NEVER BE GODS, SO DON'T EVEN TRY.  THANK YOU!

Posted by at No comments:

Too important not to mention again.

Why did it take crazy amounts of effort to get just a little something from life.

I am refering to a very tiny victory that seems big simply because I go months in life feeling empty handed or worse.

No, I am not giving a complete share mainly because I think you might laugh at me.
Posted by at No comments:

There is something

Screwy at how people describe opinion as facts full of obvious negativity, which they fail to see!  A radical failure in thoughts, oh my how fing lame.  No person is omnipotent!

Posted by at No comments:

Just turn.

O love of the places

In the dark with colored lights

Walking near her like a lion

The cave drips as I ponder

Mirror mirror

And I behold her image

Sweet cheeks and saturdays

Is the part I felt

Even quite sweet crows come

The night is lit beautifully

Dreams to compose

Stop you thief

Stop you thief

Posted by at No comments:

Looks like the world is slowly changing.

Perhaps there is a new light

Shining like the sun

As if like a waste wink

And there is love?

Posted by at No comments:

How about Five Worlds on earth each with it's own five star rating system?o


Posted by at No comments:

Stranger than fiction.

Republicans working with Obama could prove very interesting.

Posted by at No comments:

No one is an anybody.

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

So its appealing by itself for now? Yes, it is appealing as an idea to explore because it touches a very deep and recurring theme: how structure, organization, and relationships emerge from a state of possibility. The appeal comes from the simplicity of the symbolism: 0→1→2→complexity It captures an intuitive story: a lack of distinction, the emergence of unity, the appearance of difference, and then the growth of relationships and patterns. That kind of simplicity is often what makes ideas worth investigating. Many powerful mathematical ideas begin with a pattern that feels fundamental before the formal machinery is developed. At the same time, its appeal and its scientific status are different things. Right now, 0!=1 in the way you are using it is best viewed as a conceptual framework or metaphorical organizing principle, not a demonstrated physical law. The next step, if one wanted to develop it, would be to see whether it can generate precise mathematics or predictions. But as a piece of conceptual thinking, yes—the focus on unity as an organizing principle is a genuinely interesting question. It asks something very fundamental: Why does reality contain coherent structures at all? That question has been at the heart of mathematics and physics for a long time. It could help in determining when polarities are possible Yes, that is one of the more interesting ways to frame it. If your idea were developed mathematically, it could be viewed as asking: Under what conditions can a system move from a unified state into a state with distinguishable opposites or polarities? In existing science, this question appears in several forms: Symmetry breaking: A system may begin with many equivalent possibilities, then settle into a state where distinctions appear. For example, a magnet can have a preferred direction even though the underlying laws are symmetric. Phase transitions: A system can change from one type of organization to another when conditions cross a threshold. Bifurcations in dynamical systems: A small change in conditions can cause a system to split into different possible behaviors. A mathematical version of your question might be: When does a unified state become unstable and allow two or more distinct states? The "polarity" would not necessarily mean good/bad or opposite forces in a philosophical sense. It could simply mean two distinguishable states that are related by a rule. For example: 1→(+1,−1) could represent the emergence of a pair of complementary possibilities. The challenge would be defining what triggers that transition: an energy threshold? a symmetry condition? an information constraint? a mathematical instability? That is actually where your focus on 1 becomes useful. Rather than starting with the opposites, you are asking about the origin of the conditions that allow opposites to exist at all. A rigorous version of the idea would need to specify a mathematical system where: a unified state exists, a polarity can emerge, the transition point can be calculated. That would put it in conversation with existing work on symmetry, phase transitions, and emergent structures. Could you simplify this for my small human mind Absolutely. The simple version is: You are asking: How does one thing become two things? Imagine a perfectly calm, undivided situation. There is no difference, no "this side" and "that side." Then something changes, and a difference appears: 1→+1 and −1 Now there is a relationship. There is a "push" and a "pull," a direction, a pattern. A simple example: A perfectly balanced pencil standing on its tip has no chosen direction. A tiny disturbance happens. It falls one way or the other. A difference appears. The important part is not the two directions themselves. It is the moment when a difference becomes possible. Your idea with 0!=1 seems to be asking: Is there a basic mathematical rule that explains how a state of pure possibility becomes a real, organized state? Then the next question is: Once a "one" exists, when and why can it split into a "two"? That split is where polarity appears. In very simple terms: potential→unity→polarity→complexity You are not really asking about numbers. You are asking about the birth of differences and relationships. That is a big question. It is the kind of question that sits underneath ideas like symmetry breaking, the formation of structures in the universe, and how complexity arises. Your intuition is trying to find the "first step" where the universe goes from one possible state into many possible states.