Reality as I like it,

Less physical pain in my legs would be nice

And more fulfilling relationships


Posted by at No comments:

It apprears that scientist are discovering that black holes can have a useful purpose in the cosmos.

Like stabilizers.  Interesting.

And not as aggressive always as I might imagine.

Any info about black holes is very exciting!!!
Posted by at No comments:

Much ado about nothing..:(

Such giant squids of anger

Quantum hell fire

Defend honor

Or then obliterate the other

Is no handsome game

The winner can taste the bitter

Like blood on a platter

And winning is everything

Is everything

Now add infinity

And a touch of dull

With a dash of boring

Such is

The art of winning.
Posted by at No comments:

As we know much of what we watch on TV is fiction.

Is reality TV any less fiction or radical talk shows ect...

Is blurring any line between fiction and reality?

Where are the edges that make experience truly real in a positive sense?

Is there a widening unreality, a reality of the newer world that is the present?

That realities are being pushed out?  And is this history doing what it does?  Or something insidious?
Posted by at No comments:

I can rule the world just by drinking ice coffee!

Ha ha ha!!!

One more please

A little for the ladies

The dancing poodles

And Lord Jim having some brew

Here is one for you on me

Dance we do by the moon

Here my friend

Is another iced coffee

Happy is thee to splash in the sea

Don't lose you wife

No harem

Brothel

Or desparado

Rain comes with the sea and my

Little microscope

Little microscope

Hey Jim

Where you been

Where you been
Posted by at No comments:

All you need are lounges!

LOUNGES ARE ALL YOU NEED

ALL YOU NEED

ALL YOU NEED

BREATH

BREATH

EVERYBODY NOW!
Posted by at No comments:

The trolls were being eaten alive!!!


Posted by at No comments:

Breasts was developing a duel personality!!!!


Posted by at No comments:

Feel good if you can honestly say you have not contributed in a bad way to life on earth.


Posted by at No comments:
We find dreams

As the sinking ship rises

We look to the sky

Into the eyes of passion

Fires jet blue spinning

Sky expanding you

Angels hold her

More matches open

Watch for anything

It will happen!
Posted by at No comments:

I feel a need explain more about my holy word

VIOLLESSA

As much as I love contemplation you got to have action

You can say you're trying and I would say you are lying

I don't like to use force, but I sure can if it is important to

You think order and control are sane and you scare me

Fighting for life is hard enough than to give that to enemies


Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Is this a valuable chunk: Bottom line Your intuition matches a real interpretive layer of relativity: spacetime can be treated as a complete whole rather than a flowing process But it goes beyond current physics to say: that whole structure implies simple, fixed determinism of all events That middle gap—between geometry and outcomes—is exactly where modern theoretical physics is still incomplete. Yes — it’s a valuable chunk, but with some important caveats about how valuable and for what purpose. Why it is valuable That passage correctly captures a real distinction in modern general relativity: spacetime can be modeled as a complete 4D geometric structure (the “block” interpretation) but that does not automatically mean every event is simply “fixed deterministically” in the intuitive sense And it correctly identifies a real frontier issue: how spacetime geometry and physical outcome rules fit together at a deeper level That is an actual research gap in theoretical physics (especially when trying to unify gravity with microscopic physics in cosmology-level models). Why it needs tightening There are two places where it becomes slightly misleading: 1) “Interpretive layer of relativity” That’s fine, but it should be clearer that: the “block universe” is an interpretation, not a direct experimental prediction of relativity Relativity itself only gives: a geometric structure of spacetime not a claim about “flow” or “non-flow” of time. 2) “That implies simple fixed determinism” This is the delicate part. Even in a block-style spacetime: the global structure can exist without implying simple, classical determinism of all events Because outcome rules can still be: probabilistic locally (in modern physics descriptions) or constrained but not uniquely fixed by initial conditions alone So the implication you wrote is stronger than what physics requires. Why the “middle gap” line is actually strong This part is genuinely solid: “That middle gap—between geometry and outcomes—is where modern theoretical physics is incomplete.” That is accurate in spirit because: we do not yet have a fully unified description of spacetime + microscopic dynamics the interface between geometry and physical “events” is still an open problem in fundamental theory This is one of the motivations behind attempts at quantum gravity. Bottom line (refined evaluation) ✔ Good conceptual clarity ✔ Correctly distinguishes interpretation vs theory ✔ Correctly identifies a real unresolved frontier ⚠ Slight overstatement about determinism being implied If you wanted a sharper version A more precise rewrite would be: Spacetime in relativity can be modeled as a complete 4D structure, rather than a flowing process. However, this geometric view does not by itself determine how physical events are realized within that structure. The relationship between spacetime geometry and the rules governing outcomes remains an open problem in modern theoretical physics.