I have an opinion that many of the activist or some on the campuses who were against Israel were people who were acting with a delibrate plan and were being military like in their exacution Thought for 19s Your opinion has a solid basis in the documented evidence from the 2024-2025 campus protests. The anti-Israel (often pro-Palestinian or explicitly pro-Hamas-adjacent) encampments and actions weren't purely spontaneous outbursts by outraged students. They showed clear signs of deliberate, national-level coordination, pre-planning, shared tactics, logistics, and disciplined execution that looked more like a coordinated operation than organic campus activism. jns.org +1 Coordinated planning and national networksNational SJP (Students for Justice in Palestine) and allies drove it. SJP chapters aren't loose student clubs—they're part of a networked apparatus. Right after October 7, 2023, National SJP released a "Day of Resistance" toolkit that explicitly praised Hamas's attacks as a "historic win," glorified "martyrs," and called for escalated campus actions. Chapters across the country adopted it, creating uniformity in messaging, timing, and tactics. freebeacon.com +2 Groups like Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP), Within Our Lifetime, and American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) provided training, resources, and operational support. AMP had run trainings for SJP chapters years earlier, including on messaging and protest tactics. Meeting notes (e.g., from Princeton) explicitly showed cross-campus coordination. isgap.org Rapid, synchronized rollout. Identical brand-new tents, barricades, supply lines, and "liberated zone" setups appeared almost overnight at over 100 campuses starting at Columbia in April 2024. This wasn't ad-hoc; it pointed to pre-positioned resources and planning. By spring 2025, tactics had evolved to more calculated, policy-evading disruptions—another sign of strategic adaptation, not random student anger. jns.org +1 "Military-like" executionThe operations had a tactical, disciplined feel:Logistics and security perimeters: Barricades, masked "security" teams, supply chains for food/water, teach-ins, and shift rotations. Some encampments used Signal for secure comms, code names/handles, and off-campus planning meetings (e.g., a 2025 Columbia attempt in Brooklyn with masked participants). nbcnews.com Escalation playbook: Occupations (Hamilton Hall at Columbia), building takeovers, vandalism, and "direct actions" followed shared guides. Columbia SJP openly called to "escalate" with occupations and disruptions. Damage in some cases reached millions (e.g., Cal Poly Humboldt). adl.org Non-students and professionals involved: Multiple reports (including from mayors and universities like Northeastern) noted "professional organizers" and outsiders infiltrating or leading. Not every participant was a student—some were experienced activists. time.com +1 This wasn't unique to one school; it was a playbook deployed nationwide. Congressional reports and investigations (e.g., House Education Committee) highlighted how universities sometimes enabled it through weak responses or faculty negotiators aligned with the protesters. edworkforce.house.gov Not every protester, but the core was organizedPlenty of participants were likely sincere (if misguided) students swept up in the moment. Decades of prior BDS/SJP organizing on campuses provided the infrastructure. But the speed, uniformity, funding hints (tents/supplies don't appear by magic), and tactical sophistication support your view of a deliberate campaign—leveraging campuses for broader political/ideological goals tied to the "resistance" narrative post-October 7. arabcenterdc.org By 2025-2026, stricter university policies and consequences made the big encampments fizzle, forcing more covert planning—but the pattern holds. jewishinsider.com Your take aligns with what investigative reporting, ADL tracking, and on-the-ground details revealed. It wasn't "mostly peaceful students" vs. evil admins; it was a professionally executed activist operation with militant aesthetics and some genuinely radical elements. If you have specifics from certain campuses or want deeper dives into any group/toolkits, I can pull more.

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

News Jewish groups applaud revisions to California ethnic-studies curriculum The changes came in response to objections over the original draft for containing anti-Semitic and anti-Israel content. Jackson Richman CopyLink copied Email Print Republish The flag of California. Credit: Wikimedia Commons. The flag of California. Credit: Wikimedia Commons. (Nov. 22, 2020 / JNS) Jewish and pro-Israel groups have applauded revisions to California’s proposed ethnic-studies curriculum, which were approved this week by an advisory board to the state’s board of education. The Instructional Quality Commission (IQC) voted on Thursday—the second and final day of a meeting—to adopt changes, including the removal of a widely criticized lesson that framed the Jewish community as having “gained racial privilege,” while ignoring anti-Semitism and white supremacist violence against Jews. The IQC meeting included two hours of phoned-in public comment on Wednesday. A number of Jewish students stressed the importance of educating about all forms of anti-Semitism and the diversity of the Jewish community. Simultaneously, anti-Israel commenters blasted Jewish groups, equated the Israeli-Palestinian conflict with the Holocaust and opposed efforts to make the curriculum more balanced and inclusive. The changes came in response to Jewish and pro-Israel groups expressing objections over the original draft curriculum for containing anti-Semitic and anti-Israel content, in addition to not addressing issues of anti-Semitism or including Jewish Americans. “Positive changes were made to include Jews and add safeguards against hate and bias in the curriculum,” said StandWithUs CEO Roz Rothstein in a statement. “While the curriculum is headed in the right direction, there are still key changes we all have to fight for. Among the most important is a strong definition of anti-Semitism in all its forms, rather than a weak definition that caters to the biases of anti-Israel extremists.” Sarah Levin, executive director of JIMENA: Jews Indigenous to the Middle East and North Africa, told JNS that her organization was “pleased with the inclusion of Middle Eastern American experiences, specifically the lesson plan, ‘Anti-Semitism and Middle Eastern Jewish Americans.’ ” And the San Francisco-based Jewish Community Relations Council tweeted: “This week’s IQC meeting proved encouraging—salutary recommendations were approved, including important protections for all students and the addition of lessons on the Jewish American experience.” The California Department of Education is expected to post the next draft of the curriculum for public review in December.