The work of two geniuses: It looks like you've shared a collection of blog posts from two authors, Magic V and Warmest Winds, spanning several years, with a recurring theme of zombies. These posts blend poetic, surreal, and sometimes darkly humorous tones, often portraying zombies as metaphors or literal threats in a chaotic, dystopian, or absurd world. Let me break down what I make of this: Magic V’s posts seem to lean toward a mix of social commentary, satire, and vivid imagery. Zombies are a frequent symbol—sometimes representing mindless conformity, evil forces, or societal decay. For instance, lines like "Give the zombies the votes" (August 22, 2024) or "Artificial people are turning into superficial zombies" (February 22, 2023) suggest a critique of politics, human behavior, or modern culture. There’s also a playful absurdity, like selling a "ray gun" for $999 to fight stupidity and zombies (October 16, 2024), which feels like a tongue-in-cheek jab at consumerism or desperation. Warmest Winds, on the other hand, takes a more poetic and introspective approach. Their posts, often older (2013–2016), weave zombies into dreamlike or nightmarish scenes alongside other motifs like mania, ghosts, and nature. Entries like "Zombies yes / Humans no" (July 29, 2013) or "The zombies are evolving / hearts can flutter through rain" (November 10, 2016) hint at a fascination with transformation, fear, or the blurring of human and monstrous traits. There’s a sense of existential dread mixed with whimsical flourishes, like "flowers freeze in showers" (May 30, 2015). Both authors use zombies as a flexible symbol—sometimes literal, sometimes figurative—to explore fear, chaos, or the absurdity of existence. The lack of comments on all posts might suggest these are niche or personal writings, perhaps not meant for a wide audience but more as creative outlets. The shift in tone between the two authors—Magic V’s sharp-edged rants versus Warmest Winds’ lyrical musings—creates an interesting contrast, yet they share a fixation on zombies as a lens for their thoughts. What do you think of these posts? Are you looking for a deeper analysis of their meaning, the authors’ styles, or something else? DeepSearch Think Edit Image
-
-
-
QUALITY POST: What the 2025 numbers actually show ADL’s audit still found incidents in all 50 states. Raw totals were highest in New York (1,160), California (817), and New Jersey (687). Those are also the largest Jewish populations. Assaults were concentrated in New York City. National totals fell from the 2024 peak but stayed far above pre-2023 levels. FBI hate-crime data still has Jews as the large majority of religion-based victims. So “low incident count” in a small state can just mean few Jews, not a better civic culture. adl.org States that currently have the better combined reputationFlorida (especially South Florida). This is the loudest “safe to be openly Jewish” brand in the U.S. right now: large community, state-level enforcement posture, and a political class that treats synagogue security and campus disruption as law-and-order, not a speech puzzle. It also ranks well on economy and is in the U.S. News top 10 overall. Tradeoff: culture-war heat, insurance/climate costs, and it still recorded hundreds of incidents (319 in 2025) because the community is huge. vinnews.com Utah and parts of the Upper Midwest (Minnesota, Nebraska, the Dakotas, Iowa, New Hampshire). These dominate 2026 “best states” lists for schools, fiscal stability, crime, and family metrics. Day-to-day life for a generic resident is often calmer than in NY/CA. Jewish life exists but is thinner.
-
-
-
I am wondering though are there physicists who say time is completely man made and is not real. Thought for 6s Yes — some physicists say that, but almost none mean “time is a made-up calendar like money.” They mean the flow, the global now, or time as a fundamental ingredient is not in the basic laws. Clocks, aging, and change still happen.Einstein already wrote that for physicists the distinction between past, present, and future is “only a stubbornly persistent illusion.” He meant there is no single moving present for the whole universe. He did not mean clocks are fake. physicsworld.com Julian Barbour is the blunt case. In The End of Time he argues there is no flowing time and no hidden time axis. Reality is a heap of complete “Nows.” What we call history is structure inside a Now (a “time capsule”), not travel along a line. Motion and passage are how we read differences between configurations. That is as close as a working physicist gets to “time is not real.” It is a minority view, taken seriously as a research program, not as settled fact. en.wikipedia.org Carlo Rovelli is the most visible living voice. He has written that time does not exist at the fundamental level: loop-quantum-gravity equations need no time variable; past and future look the same in microscopic laws; the “flow” is largely how a coarse-grained, heat-sensitive brain sits inside rising entropy. He also says our experience of time is not a mere error — it is real for us, like the sky “turning” because Earth rotates. So: not fundamental, not man-made from nothing, but perspectival. theguardian.com Others nearby, not identicalPage and Wootters: in a globally frozen quantum universe, “evolution” is entanglement with a clock subsystem. Nima Arkani-Hamed and many quantum-gravity / holography people: spacetime itself is probably emergent, not basic. Lee Smolin often disagrees with full timelessness and defends a real present; useful as a contrast. What almost nobody in physics claims: that seconds, cesium clocks, or “Tuesday” are arbitrary social inventions with no physical correlate. Units and calendars are human. Duration, causal order, and proper time along a worldline are not.So the accurate map is:Claim Who Status No universal flowing now Einstein, most relativists Mainstream Time not in the deepest equations Rovelli, some quantum gravity Active research Time is only an illusion; only static Nows Barbour Minority, discussed Time is a human convention like money Almost no physicist Not a physics position Your “time doesn’t exist” slogan sits nearest Barbour and popular Rovelli. The field’s careful version is: the thing we feel as a river is not a basic piece of the world; change and clocks still are.
-
-
-
-
No comments:
Post a Comment