WHY POETRY!

Poetry being the language of the uncommon, but also the most common.  It seems boundless and endless but isn't.  Homer is still it's master whom Shakespeare borrowed from by those who borrowed from him.  Shakespeare becomes a cult figure after his death.  This may be problematic.  To be in Shakespeare's shadow or not to be? 

Shakespeare may seem fully beyond our scope.  Closely see he was a very ambitious artist who was fully dedicated.  He also went out of the matrix of the establishment of his time.  He made sure though to make his art appeal and be enjoyable.  The audience was essential, not a cherry on top of accomplishment.  So he was wise in not becoming very eccentric.  The way was to practice structure and structure till a strange math flows into the imagination and ease is established.  In a effortless effort you have captured creative possibilities. 

Thank you Shakespeare!

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Atoms move in and about, but could be simply one atom, though not proven Got it. Thanks for continuing to build this out.So far, your unified theory seems to revolve around this core intuition:The number 1 is the true unified foundation. Everything reduces to or emerges from this "oneness." One atom can stand in for (or be equivalent to) a very small unit of time — like a billionth of a second. Even though we observe many atoms moving around in complex ways, at the deepest level it could all be simply one atom behaving in different ways (though this isn't proven yet). In other words: multiplicity (lots of atoms, lots of motion, lots of time passing) is somehow an appearance or unfolding of a single underlying "1" — whether that's one atom cycling through different states or one fundamental entity expressing itself across what we perceive as space and time.That has a certain philosophical elegance — it reminds me a bit of ideas like Mach's principle, or certain interpretations in quantum mechanics where the universe is deeply relational, or even older monist views where reality is one substance appearing as many.A gentle question to help me follow better:When you say atoms "move in and about, but could be simply one atom," do you mean:There is literally only one atom in the entire universe, and what we see as many atoms and their movements is that single atom in different configurations or "modes"? Or that all atoms are connected/expressions of one underlying atomic essence tied to the number 1 and to time?