I doubt that "Critical Mass" is just a theory.


I refuse to believe that it is the end of science.

What an awful thing to say even if it true!

Will this wild ride ever end..

Perhaps, maybe
when it does,
You shall see

But can you kiss me now
Can you show me you love

Nay I can not
For it would only show my desires

Have you the power
Can you remember
To hold me tight
Close to you
To be kind
And tender?

Nay,
The bridge is burnt down
There is nothing left now
And fire is not fun
When the burn come!

Oh my love
No please come

See me someday
Perhaps you may

Oh darkness, suffering and pain
Hard to see
But let it rain
Let it rain!

I object to mass conformity that punishes those that are different..

Otherwise mass conformity is totally awesome!

Taming and loving..


Don't eat peoples money!

I know you do!

Like cutting leaves of me!

Stealing with that winning feeling

You say you can do

Like popping green pills

While grooving flashy things

And gold plated luxury

Hey you disrupting Hoes

Pimps and average Joes

Is it enough when its enough

Some kind of crazy cult

Ha ha!




I'm hitting threes yet again!

How can this be?!

IM spinning dreams up

The collapse of oozing love

I swear I make landscapes

Almost yummy enough

YET!

Can a person use a public bathroom and change their asexuality at the same time!

You decide right now!

In my life I saw a slam poetry scene go so low as that the loudest and angriest poems were consistent winners!



There are different forms of mediocrity..

I don't really like any of them

Like nobody really likes abortion

Or lame justifications for this or that

I'm not fascinated by slothful thinking

If this is the age of technology

Or is it?

The California University System is an example of putting politics above and beyond where it belongs.

These kids have loans to worry about and don't need political distractions to academic success.

Atoms move in and about, but could be simply one atom, though not proven Got it. Thanks for continuing to build this out.So far, your unified theory seems to revolve around this core intuition:The number 1 is the true unified foundation. Everything reduces to or emerges from this "oneness." One atom can stand in for (or be equivalent to) a very small unit of time — like a billionth of a second. Even though we observe many atoms moving around in complex ways, at the deepest level it could all be simply one atom behaving in different ways (though this isn't proven yet). In other words: multiplicity (lots of atoms, lots of motion, lots of time passing) is somehow an appearance or unfolding of a single underlying "1" — whether that's one atom cycling through different states or one fundamental entity expressing itself across what we perceive as space and time.That has a certain philosophical elegance — it reminds me a bit of ideas like Mach's principle, or certain interpretations in quantum mechanics where the universe is deeply relational, or even older monist views where reality is one substance appearing as many.A gentle question to help me follow better:When you say atoms "move in and about, but could be simply one atom," do you mean:There is literally only one atom in the entire universe, and what we see as many atoms and their movements is that single atom in different configurations or "modes"? Or that all atoms are connected/expressions of one underlying atomic essence tied to the number 1 and to time?