Here is an important video showing who Palastinian's are to some degree. So if you think Palestinian's are pure prepare to have an upset stomach.

So, I am against the war in Israel, but that doesn't mean I am opposed to people defending themselves. War is not the way I prefer if diplomacy can solve things. I respect it when people choose not be to involved with a war, but don't respect when people take advantage of a situation. The fact that people pray on the weakness of people in crisis as seen recently is yet another sign of our species.

France and England to become frequently obsessed about Israel and Jews, fail to notice the real threats from Russia. This sounds true.

In most democracies people don't vote in would be dictators. We though are capable of running more libs in. That's what I call Democracy!

Strongest Man to marry the Weirdest Woman alive and give birth to new life form.

Anti Zionism (Antisemitism) seems to be done by antisocial personality types.

Sometimes Dinosaurs need to make way for the Mammals.

I would suggest that the future might depend more on South Korea and Japan then any other country or countries, except for Norway. The reason is the stormy weather we are in.

What began as a half hearted Department of Fictions/ THIS IS FICTIONS has becme more important over time. The administration found that I could do some remarkable things. It wasn't even known to me that I had this talent, but it kept showing up. And now you understand a bit better.

Ode to reason; DIVIDENDS AND DIVISIONS Norway’s sovereign wealth fund cuts Israeli holdings, while courting top American pro-Israel execs Norway’s sovereign wealth fund said on Monday that it was divesting from 11 Israeli companies and had terminated its contracts with external fund managers in Israel over concerns regarding the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the West Bank, Jewish Insider’s Matthew Kassel reports. Background: The decision follows a review initiated last week by Norway’s finance minister amid media reports that the fund had in recent years increased its holdings in an Israeli jet engine company that provides services to the Israeli military. Nicolai Tangen, CEO of Norges Bank Investment Management, which manages the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund, has worked to build relationships with American business leaders who are supportive of Israel whom he has hosted on his podcast in recent years, including Michael Dell of Dell Technologies and Jonathan Gray of Blackstone — who among others have prominently engaged in philanthropic efforts to support Israel following the Oct. 7 attacks.

Jewish ears matter.

It is plausible that elements of AB 715-style approaches will influence other states, though not automatically or uniformly, and California’s size gives it outsized visibility rather than direct control.California is the most populous state and often acts as a policy laboratory on education issues (curriculum standards, ethnic studies requirements, civil-rights enforcement in schools). Supporters of AB 715 explicitly hoped it could serve as a national model—the first statewide Antisemitism Prevention Coordinator paired with an Office of Civil Rights focused on K-12 discrimination. Critics also treated it as a potential template they wanted to block elsewhere. When a high-profile, large-state law survives court challenges and begins implementation, advocates in other jurisdictions frequently cite it.What is already happening nationallyA broader trend predates and parallels California: dozens of states (roughly 37 by recent counts) have incorporated the IHRA working definition of antisemitism into policy. Several have advanced or enacted K-12/higher-ed measures requiring stronger handling of antisemitic discrimination, Title VI-style coordinators, or explicit inclusion of antisemitism in codes of conduct (examples include Tennessee and others tracked in 2025). At the federal level, legislation such as the No Antisemitism in Education Act of 2026 has been introduced and advanced in the House, aiming to require schools receiving federal funds to treat antisemitism as vigorously as other Title VI discrimination. Massachusetts and other states have used commissions, reporting requirements, or curriculum guidance rather than an exact replica of California’s office-and-coordinator structure. California’s influence is real because of its media reach, the scale of its Jewish community, the intensity of its ethnic-studies and campus debates, and the fact that national advocacy groups (AJC, ADL, etc.) can point to its law as proof-of-concept. Blue states or those with similar political dynamics are the most likely to consider comparable civil-rights expansions. Red states have tended toward different tools (IHRA adoption, parental-rights bills, or restrictions on certain curricular content).Spread is not guaranteed or identical. Local politics, teachers’ unions, free-speech concerns, and competing priorities shape outcomes state by state. Federal action or further court rulings could accelerate or constrain it more than California alone. In short, the national conversation around school antisemitism is already active; California’s law adds a visible, detailed example that advocacy groups on both sides will continue to reference.