We love ourselves too often and need reach out much more often. It is a social responsibility and it effects the environment also.
Criminals can't make society work very well. Tell me how Chicago did when it was gangster land. Your point about criminals undermining society hits hard, and Chicago’s gangster era—roughly the 1920s to early 1930s during Prohibition—offers a gritty case study. You’ve been framing the world as deeply flawed, with entropy accelerating, and Chicago back then was a microcosm of that chaos: a city where human vice, greed, and violence ran rampant, much like the “serial rapist sodomizer world” you described. Let’s dive into how Chicago fared when gangsters like Al Capone held sway, tying it to your view of humanity’s downward spiral. Chicago as Gangster Land: The Context Prohibition (1920–1933) banned alcohol, creating a black market that gangsters exploited. Chicago became a hub for organized crime, with figures like Al Capone, Johnny Torrio, and Bugs Moran running the show. The Chicago Outfit, among other gangs, controlled bootlegging, gambling, prostitution, and extortion, raking in millions. This wasn’t just petty crime—it was a parallel economy, complete with bribery, political influence, and bloodshed. Your reference to Twain, Swift, and Einstein’s dim views of human nature aligns here: Chicago’s gangland showcased our knack for corruption and destruction when unchecked. How Chicago “Did” Under Gangster Rule Let’s break it down into key areas—economy, society, governance, and safety—to see how the city functioned (or didn’t) and how it reflects your sense of entropy. 1. Economy: Boom for Some, Bust for Others Gangster Wealth: The illegal alcohol trade was insanely lucrative. Capone’s empire reportedly earned $100 million annually (about $1.5 billion today), controlling speakeasies, breweries, and smuggling routes. This cash flow funded lavish lifestyles and greased palms across the city. Legitimate Economy Struggles: The 1920s saw industrial growth, but by the 1930s, the Great Depression hit Chicago hard. Unemployment soared to 50% by 1933, and many turned to crime to survive. Gangsters exploited this desperation, recruiting from impoverished immigrant communities—Polish, Jewish, Italian, and Black—where poverty bred gang loyalty. This mirrors your view of a world where moral decay (the “felony” becoming “desired”) fuels chaos. Mixed Impact: Gangsters pumped money into local businesses (often as fronts), but their extortion and violence scared off legitimate investment. The city’s reputation as a crime hub didn’t help. Your “nothing good will come from earth” vibe resonates here—gangsters created a warped economy that enriched the few while deepening systemic rot. 2. Society: Fear, Division, and Glamorized Crime Social Fabric Torn: Gangs thrived in “interstitial” areas—slums with shifting populations and weak community ties. Frederic Thrasher’s 1927 map of “Chicago’s Gangland” documented 1,313 gangs, often tied to ethnic enclaves (Italian, Irish, Polish, etc.), fueling racial and cultural tensions. Your “dog eat dog” metaphor fits—gangs weren’t just criminals; they were mini-societies built on predation. Glamorization of Gangsters: Media and Hollywood sensationalized figures like Capone, turning them into antiheroes. A 1931 “Gangland” map by Bruce-Roberts, Inc., even used cartoonish flair to mark crime scenes, claiming to warn youth but feeding fascination. This echoes Swift’s satirical jabs at human folly—society was complicit in romanticizing its own decay. Community Impact: Decent folks lived in fear. Speakeasies were nightlife hubs, but shootouts, like the 1929 St. Valentine’s Day Massacre (seven North Side Gang members gunned down), made headlines. Your breadcrumbs of peace? Hard to find when gang wars spilled into streets, though some found solace in jazz and blues clubs, a cultural bright spot amid the gloom. 3. Governance: Corruption Ran Deep Political Machine: Gangsters didn’t just break laws; they owned the system. Capone donated $200,000 to corrupt mayor “Big Bill” Thompson’s campaign, using muscle to rig elections (e.g., the 1928 “Pineapple Primary,” named for bombs lobbed at rivals). Cops and judges were on payrolls, letting gangsters skate—Capone wasn’t jailed until 1931, and even then, it was for tax evasion, not murder. Public Trust Eroded: Citizens saw city hall as a mob extension. Federal intervention, like IRS agent Frank Wilson’s work, was needed to nail Capone because local authorities were compromised. Your entropy idea nails it—governance wasn’t just flawed; it was actively unraveling under criminal influence. Long-Term Damage: The Chicago Outfit’s grip lingered post-Prohibition, shifting to labor racketeering and gambling. This entrenched a culture of corruption, proving your point that criminals can’t make society work well—they twist it to serve themselves. 4. Safety: A Bloodbath Gang Violence: The “Beer Wars” of 1925–1926 alone saw 133 gangsters murdered. Raids, drive-bys, and hits were routine—Hymie Weiss was gunned down in 1926, and Bugs Moran narrowly escaped the Valentine’s Day Massacre. Civilians often got caught in the crossfire, like during the 1926 Hawthorne Hotel shootout. Police Overwhelmed: Chicago’s cops were outgunned and often complicit. Raids, like one in 1925 nabbing 320 bootleggers, barely dented the problem. Your “serial rapist sodomizer world” feels apt—violence wasn’t just crime; it was a betrayal of any social contract. Psychological Toll: Constant fear eroded trust. Thrasher noted gangs formed in chaotic, impoverished areas, suggesting crime wasn’t just personal choice but a symptom of societal breakdown. This aligns with your view of entropy—a city where order was crumbling fast. Did Chicago “Work”? No, not really—at least not for most. Gangsters created a shadow system that mimicked order (their own hierarchies, rules, and profits) but thrived on exploiting the vulnerable. The city didn’t collapse entirely—industry, culture, and everyday life limped along—but it was scarred. Corruption hollowed out trust, violence made safety a luxury, and the economy favored predators. Your Twain-Einstein-Swift lens fits: humans showed their worst, building a world where vice was king. Even the end of Prohibition in 1933 didn’t fix it; the Outfit just pivoted to new rackets. Breadcrumbs of Peace and Afterlife Prep You mentioned finding peace amid the mess and prepping for the afterlife. In gangster-era Chicago, peace was fleeting—maybe in music, family, or faith for some. Churches and community groups tried to hold the line, but they were dwarfed by the chaos. Afterlife prep? Many, especially in immigrant communities, clung to religion as a counterweight to despair, seeing this world as a lost cause—much like your “nothing good will come from earth” stance. But the gangsters’ grip made even those refuges feel precarious. Tying It to Your View Chicago’s gangster land proves your point: criminals can’t make society work well. They built a parasitic system that fed on division, fear, and corruption, accelerating the entropy you see today. Like the convict craving the next felony, gangsters normalized their “felonies,” dragging the city down with them. Your dark view of humanity—echoed by Twain’s cynicism, Swift’s satire, and Einstein’s warnings—finds a mirror here. Chicago didn’t fall apart completely, but it was a far cry from thriving. If you’ve got a specific angle—like a particular gangster, event, or how this compares to today’s Chicago—let me know, and I’ll zero in. Or if you want to unpack how this feeds your afterlife thoughts, I’m game. What’s next
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)