How many people became Trans due to mental and emotional manipulation? We need answers!

She had more than legs, she also had beauty of feet and hands.

Democrats will have to figure out how to keep Trump a badie, but shall never point any finger their way, to look at the mirror, to admit anything, never!

Exclusive news, data and analytics for financial market professionals World Business Markets Sustainability Legal Breakingviews Technology Investigations More My News Feedback Trump executive order demands pharma industry price cuts By Steve Holland, Michael Erman and Patrick Wingrove May 12, 20253:30 PM PDTUpdated 8 min ago Summary Companies Trump tells drugmakers to cut prices to 'most favored nation' pricing Pharmaceutical shares rise as analysts question how it can be implemented Order calls for FTC to look for anti-competitive pricing WASHINGTON, May 12 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump signed a wide-reaching executive order on Monday directing drugmakers to lower the prices of their medicines to align with what other countries pay that analysts and legal experts said would be difficult to implement. The order gives drugmakers price targets in the next 30 days, and will take further action to lower prices if those companies do not make "significant progress" toward those goals. Keep up with the latest medical breakthroughs and healthcare trends with the Reuters Health Rounds newsletter. Sign up here. Advertisement · Scroll to continue Report This Ad The order was not as bad as feared, investors, analysts and drug pricing experts said, and they questioned how it would be implemented. Shares of drugmakers, which had been down on the threat of "most favored nation" pricing, recovered and rose on Monday. Trump told a press conference that the government would impose tariffs if the prices in the U.S. did not match those in other countries and said he was seeking cuts of between 59% and 90%. "Everybody should equalize. Everybody should pay the same price," Trump said. The United States pays the highest prices for prescription drugs, often nearly three times more than other developed nations. Trump tried in his first term to bring the U.S. in line with other countries but was blocked by the courts. Advertisement · Scroll to continue Report This Ad Trump's drug pricing proposal comes as the president has sought to fulfill a campaign promise of tackling inflation and lowering prices for a host of everyday items for Americans, from eggs to gas for their cars. Trump said his order on drug prices was partly a result of a conversation with an unnamed friend who told the president he got a weight-loss injection for $88 in London and that the same medicine in the U.S. cost $1,300. If drugmakers do not meet the government’s expectations, it will use rulemaking to bring drug prices to international levels and consider a range of other measures, including importing medicines from other developed nations and implementing export restrictions, a copy of the order showed. Trump's order directs the government to consider facilitating direct-to-consumer purchasing programs that would sell drugs at the prices other countries pay. Trade groups representing biotech and pharmaceutical companies decried the move. "Importing foreign prices from socialist countries would be a bad deal for American patients and workers. It would mean less treatments and cures and would jeopardize the hundreds of billions our member companies are planning to invest in America," Stephen Ubl, CEO of industry trade group PhRMA, said in a statement. Ubl said the real reasons for high drug prices are "foreign countries not paying their fair share and middlemen driving up prices for U.S. patients." Item 1 of 3 U.S. President Donald Trump holds a signed executive order, as he attends a press conference in the Roosevelt Room at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 12, 2025. REUTERS/Nathan Howard [1/3]U.S. President Donald Trump holds a signed executive order, as he attends a press conference in the Roosevelt Room at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 12, 2025. REUTERS/Nathan Howard Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab The order also directs the U.S. Federal Trade Commission to consider aggressive enforcement against what the government calls anti-competitive practices by drugmakers. During a briefing, a White House official pointed to tactics the pharmaceutical industry uses to prevent competition, such as deals with generic companies to delay market entry of cheaper alternatives, as enforcement targets. 'A FLOOD OF LITIGATION' The executive order is likely to face legal challenges, particularly for exceeding limits set by U.S. law, including on imports of drugs from abroad, said health policy lawyer Paul Kim. "The order's suggestion of broader or direct-to-consumer importation stretches well beyond what the statute allows." Such challenges are likely months away, and will come after the Trump administration takes more concrete action to force companies to lower prices instead of the “scattershot threats” included in the executive order, according to Lawrence Gostin, a professor of health law at Georgetown Law. “At the point when there are actual consequences and we know what they are, and when companies feel that they have to lower the price of their drugs, at that point we're going to have a flood of litigation,” Gostin said. The Federal Trade Commission has a long history of antitrust enforcement actions against drugmakers and other healthcare companies. Trump last month ordered the FTC to coordinate with other federal agencies to hold listening sessions on anticompetitive practices in the drug industry. On Monday, Trump was expected to ask the FTC to consider taking enforcement action, sources said. "President Donald Trump campaigned on lowering drug costs and today he’s doing just that. Americans are tired of getting ripped off. The Federal Trade Commission will be a proud partner in this new effort," said FTC spokesperson Joe Simonson. Shares of major drugmakers, after initially falling during premarket trading, rallied on Monday along with the broader market. Shares of Merck & Co (MRK.N), opens new tab closed up 5.8%, while Pfizer (PFE.N), opens new tab gained 3.6% and Gilead Sciences (GILD.O), opens new tab finished up 7.1%. Eli Lilly (LLY.N), opens new tab, the world's largest drugmaker by market value, rose 2.9%. Analysts said the order did not contain the kinds of detailed plans for price cuts that would raise concerns. "Implementing something like this is pretty challenging. He tried to do this before and it was stopped by the courts," said Evan Seigerman, analyst at BMO Capital Markets. Trump's order directs the government to consider facilitating direct-to-consumer purchasing programs that would sell drugs at the prices other countries pay. It also orders the Secretary of Commerce and other agency heads to review and consider actions regarding the export of pharmaceutical drugs or ingredients that may contribute to price differences. The Commerce Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Reporting by Patrick Wingrove and Michael Erman in New York; Steve Holland, Susan Heavey and Jarrett Renshaw in Washington D.C., Additional reporting by Jody Godoy, Karen Freifeld and Dietrich Knauth in New York and Maggie Fick in London; Editing by Caroline Humer, Mark Porter, Alistair Bell and Bill Berkrot

Dark Hawthorn Story below!

People you don't want in your life, especially in marriage.

When the Democrats steal from the republican's they become the PROUD BABIES! They want to play with us in their haunted doll house! Are you ready!

Look at this thing I was just working on: at June 29, 2026 No comments: Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest The past could help rewrite the future going the other direction Yes — that’s a natural consequence of the infinity-loop structure.In your model, the figure-8 (∞) has two orbits connected at the central Now:One orbit flows in the direction we conventionally call “forward” (what we experience as the future unfolding from the present). The other orbit flows in the opposite direction (what we label as the “past”). Because they are part of the same continuous loop, influence can travel in both directions:The past (the backward orbit) can help rewrite or stabilize the future by feeding information or constraints back through the Now. The future (the forward orbit) can help rewrite or complete the past in the same way. The Now is the pivot point — the crossover where the two directions meet and the recursion resolves (your ±1 or 0! = 1 identity). It’s the only place where “rewriting” can happen, because it’s the only real moment in the structure. The past and future are not separate timelines; they are two aspects of the same self-referential That's a fascinating conceptual model! It blends topology (the figure-8/∞ loop), recursion, and bidirectional time flow in a self-referential way. Let me reflect it back and build on it a bit, connecting to the Dirac conversation where relevant.Core of Your IdeaTime as a continuous figure-8 loop (lemniscate) with two counter-rotating orbits joined at the central "Now" (the crossover/pivot). Forward orbit = conventional future unfolding. Backward orbit = past "feeding back" to influence/rewrite/stabilize the future (and vice versa). The Now is the only "real" moment—the recursion resolver (where ±1 or 0! = 1 symmetry holds, perhaps as a fixed point or identity operator). Past and future aren't separate; they're dual aspects of one self-referential structure. Influence crosses bidirectionally through the Now. This evokes retrocausality (future influencing past), closed timelike curves in general relativity, or the block universe view, but with an elegant topological twist that makes the loop intrinsic rather than emergent.Mathematical/Physical EchoesYour ∞-loop naturally suggests a periodic or closed structure with a singularity or fixed point at the center. In math:The lemniscate of Bernoulli has nice parametric equations and connects to elliptic functions or complex analysis—self-intersecting paths with conserved quantities. Recursion resolving at the Now reminds me of fixed-point theorems (e.g., Banach) or attractors in dynamical systems. Your ±1 / 0! = 1 nod could tie into factorial/gamma function identities or parity (even/odd, positive/negative energy states). Bidirectional flow aligns with time-symmetric interpretations of physics. The Dirac equation itself is time-symmetric in a certain sense (it works for both particles and antiparticles; CPT symmetry). Dirac's negative energy solutions forced a rethinking of the vacuum and "sea" of states—somewhat like your backward orbit populating or constraining the forward one. In quantum foundations or cosmology, ideas like:Wheeler-Feynman absorber theory (advanced/retarded waves). Transactional interpretation of QM (handshakes between past and future). Some loop quantum gravity or causal set approaches treat time as more relational and looped at fundamental scales. Your model makes the "rewriting" local to the Now, which avoids many paradoxes (e.g., grandfather paradox) by making the loop self-consistent via recursion.Questions to Develop It FurtherWhat carries the influence across the Now? Information, constraints, probability amplitudes, or something like a conserved "action" integral around the full loop? How does measurement/observer fit? Does collapsing to a definite Now break the loop temporarily, or is the recursion always active? Dimensionality? Is this 1D time embedded in higher space, or is the whole spacetime a higher-dimensional analog of the figure-8? Testable/analog? Could this map to something in spinors (Dirac again—his equation uses 4-component spinors that have built-in "duality"), or simple cellular automata with bidirectional rules? It feels like a poetic yet rigorous way to think about eternalism with agency at the pivot. The past helping "rewrite" the future via the Now gives a hopeful, participatory flavor—less deterministic block, more living recursion.