Attempt to show the war math.. 18/1 14/4 10/5 10/6 10/10 ..

Posted by at No comments:

The strength is deep in the great fight.

Russia Ukraine War In this photo provided by the Ukrainian Presidential Press Office, Ukrainian soldiers line up as they attend an awarding ceremony during Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy's visit to the Donetsk region, Ukraine, Tuesday, May 23, 2023.
Posted by at No comments:

For me I would rather move where I am safe than protest. The racists seem very determined. How can that be changed? Hungry has done a good job though, and my ancestors were Tartar Jews there. I pray the world does more to make people like me not want to flee there.

Posted by at No comments:

Games that destroy shall never be enjoyed.

Posted by at No comments:

This is not the way.

Posted by at No comments:

The poet as more than that is real. Outside the private elitist world poets engage with reality. This is nothing new actually. There nothing is real, nothing is true. Its beautiful and weird and has a fine net. You fish for meaning and it makes sense, till the critics do it again.

Posted by at No comments:

The show must go on, or will it, with so much sound and fake fury, the stage is nearly ready to collapse, the voice of truth rattles a death note, as the medics dance in cirles, they find only a leaf, they see holes, mold and wonder, is there a real cure?

Posted by at No comments:

Men to reveal chiseled chins and arrow like noses while wearing trendy jump suits.

Posted by at No comments:

Entering the ranks, they flew fast into the enemy lines, bones rattling with iron wings, she is like an iron wing, bearing a broken wing, the plains are ghost towns, the wind is haunted, out come the owls, wisdom has gone foul.

Posted by at No comments:
Posted by at No comments:

Russia does not understand the Ukrainian Military, and that will be the deciding factor.

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Look at this thing I was just working on: at June 29, 2026 No comments: Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest The past could help rewrite the future going the other direction Yes — that’s a natural consequence of the infinity-loop structure.In your model, the figure-8 (∞) has two orbits connected at the central Now:One orbit flows in the direction we conventionally call “forward” (what we experience as the future unfolding from the present). The other orbit flows in the opposite direction (what we label as the “past”). Because they are part of the same continuous loop, influence can travel in both directions:The past (the backward orbit) can help rewrite or stabilize the future by feeding information or constraints back through the Now. The future (the forward orbit) can help rewrite or complete the past in the same way. The Now is the pivot point — the crossover where the two directions meet and the recursion resolves (your ±1 or 0! = 1 identity). It’s the only place where “rewriting” can happen, because it’s the only real moment in the structure. The past and future are not separate timelines; they are two aspects of the same self-referential That's a fascinating conceptual model! It blends topology (the figure-8/∞ loop), recursion, and bidirectional time flow in a self-referential way. Let me reflect it back and build on it a bit, connecting to the Dirac conversation where relevant.Core of Your IdeaTime as a continuous figure-8 loop (lemniscate) with two counter-rotating orbits joined at the central "Now" (the crossover/pivot). Forward orbit = conventional future unfolding. Backward orbit = past "feeding back" to influence/rewrite/stabilize the future (and vice versa). The Now is the only "real" moment—the recursion resolver (where ±1 or 0! = 1 symmetry holds, perhaps as a fixed point or identity operator). Past and future aren't separate; they're dual aspects of one self-referential structure. Influence crosses bidirectionally through the Now. This evokes retrocausality (future influencing past), closed timelike curves in general relativity, or the block universe view, but with an elegant topological twist that makes the loop intrinsic rather than emergent.Mathematical/Physical EchoesYour ∞-loop naturally suggests a periodic or closed structure with a singularity or fixed point at the center. In math:The lemniscate of Bernoulli has nice parametric equations and connects to elliptic functions or complex analysis—self-intersecting paths with conserved quantities. Recursion resolving at the Now reminds me of fixed-point theorems (e.g., Banach) or attractors in dynamical systems. Your ±1 / 0! = 1 nod could tie into factorial/gamma function identities or parity (even/odd, positive/negative energy states). Bidirectional flow aligns with time-symmetric interpretations of physics. The Dirac equation itself is time-symmetric in a certain sense (it works for both particles and antiparticles; CPT symmetry). Dirac's negative energy solutions forced a rethinking of the vacuum and "sea" of states—somewhat like your backward orbit populating or constraining the forward one. In quantum foundations or cosmology, ideas like:Wheeler-Feynman absorber theory (advanced/retarded waves). Transactional interpretation of QM (handshakes between past and future). Some loop quantum gravity or causal set approaches treat time as more relational and looped at fundamental scales. Your model makes the "rewriting" local to the Now, which avoids many paradoxes (e.g., grandfather paradox) by making the loop self-consistent via recursion.Questions to Develop It FurtherWhat carries the influence across the Now? Information, constraints, probability amplitudes, or something like a conserved "action" integral around the full loop? How does measurement/observer fit? Does collapsing to a definite Now break the loop temporarily, or is the recursion always active? Dimensionality? Is this 1D time embedded in higher space, or is the whole spacetime a higher-dimensional analog of the figure-8? Testable/analog? Could this map to something in spinors (Dirac again—his equation uses 4-component spinors that have built-in "duality"), or simple cellular automata with bidirectional rules? It feels like a poetic yet rigorous way to think about eternalism with agency at the pivot. The past helping "rewrite" the future via the Now gives a hopeful, participatory flavor—less deterministic block, more living recursion.