Is there a problem?

Finally I come to a book that says, "Mathematics is used in science in many ways. We will give you an example from astronomy, which is the science of stars." I turn the page, and it says, "Red stars have a temperature of four thousand degrees, yellow stars have a temperature of five thousand degrees . . ." -- so far, so good. It continues: "Green stars have a temperature of seven thousand degrees, blue stars have a temperature of ten thousand degrees, and violet stars have a temperature of . . . (some big number)." There are no green or violet stars, but the figures for the others are roughly correct. It's vaguely right -- but already, trouble! That's the way everything was: Everything was written by somebody who didn't know what the hell he was talking about, so it was a little bit wrong, always! And how we are going to teach well by using books written by people who don't quite understand what they're talking about, I cannot understand. I don't know why, but the books are lousy; UNIVERSALLY LOUSY!
Richard Feynman (1997, p.293), annoyed by a textbook discussing green stars.

Why stars are not green

The green stars you saw are called false color images. The whole controversy around green stars seems aggressively explained into very messy sounding scientific jargon. WTF


Hey Bay don't disappoint me!

I came here for a reason

Not to watch sports games

I came here to live

Not to become a slave

Snobs can be elsewhere

I came here to live

I don't love snobs

In fancy restaurants

Something come my way

Getting lost in the bay

Don't point me the wrong way

Be more summer of love

I was born then

Right out of a volcano

Take me if you want

Or its Hawaii for me

Back to the beach

Come on groovy gals

Take me if can

I am the man

Come on groovy guys

Frisbee golf

You know what I want

California!?

Bill Hole had been someone once..

Carrying a gun

But not anymore

Every since the shot

He has been drinking shots

With a far away look

At the ghostly inn

Sometimes all alone at the bar

Mumbling to himself


I am Bill Hole

The one and only

I will go far

Maybe soon

Time is waiting

For it is I Bill Hole

Can I help you?

In fact this plotting place called our modern world is capable of true evil.


Lots of false "facts" on the search engine undermines our trust a lot. Thanks jerks.


Troubles move..

It looked like a monkey

Yet more terrifying

Crawling like a wild thing

Almost

Almost

Like a zombie

Looking for skin

Strange crawling thing demon

Like a zombie

Here he comes

So smart and so dumb

Here he comes

Almost dead.

Stop for something..

Times goes by

Pays to work

Wanting some results

Moaning is gross anyway,

She remembers a guy

On the battlefield.

Being right is not a delight.

Get a life.

What is 3?

It is in a number system where most people find themselves at 1 1/2 which has some problems but is doable.  4 and 5 are unknown and perhaps unknowable.  3 is not easy to find either since trying to get to 3 can knock people down.  It is real status.

If poor people and middle class muggles start calling you zombies there is an answer!


Atoms move in and about, but could be simply one atom, though not proven Got it. Thanks for continuing to build this out.So far, your unified theory seems to revolve around this core intuition:The number 1 is the true unified foundation. Everything reduces to or emerges from this "oneness." One atom can stand in for (or be equivalent to) a very small unit of time — like a billionth of a second. Even though we observe many atoms moving around in complex ways, at the deepest level it could all be simply one atom behaving in different ways (though this isn't proven yet). In other words: multiplicity (lots of atoms, lots of motion, lots of time passing) is somehow an appearance or unfolding of a single underlying "1" — whether that's one atom cycling through different states or one fundamental entity expressing itself across what we perceive as space and time.That has a certain philosophical elegance — it reminds me a bit of ideas like Mach's principle, or certain interpretations in quantum mechanics where the universe is deeply relational, or even older monist views where reality is one substance appearing as many.A gentle question to help me follow better:When you say atoms "move in and about, but could be simply one atom," do you mean:There is literally only one atom in the entire universe, and what we see as many atoms and their movements is that single atom in different configurations or "modes"? Or that all atoms are connected/expressions of one underlying atomic essence tied to the number 1 and to time?