The sound and fury signifies everything.

Posted by at No comments:

The visual world can be interesting, yet invalidating.

Why is science so shy of the realities of our number one sensory organ?

Posted by at No comments:

How about odd light smarco..

A remiinder that we are not as here as we like to imagine even the mind can shift to nowhere, the threat of perceptions great?
Posted by at No comments:

Goat was dreaming

Chewing on some string

His friend nose came close

Friend!

Goat was very happy to

See nose!

Goat lost control

Then bounced from hill to hill

It was the best day ever!!! :-)
Posted by at No comments:

Each toe was gold..

She smiled

As she wiggled them

I seem bold

As if I had build

And my sword strong

In the victory march

I saw a perfect swan

Lifting it great wings

Some swan she was

As like a dream.
Posted by at No comments:

We need King Kong more than ever before.

Do you have his cell phone number?
Posted by at No comments:

When the Foo shits wear it.


Posted by at No comments:

I predict the year will really begin soon.

Just a luck guess.
Posted by at No comments:

THERE SHE WAS..

It was Big Bertha feeling good

Loving the big city yet again

Riding the trolly

What a day for a cow

And what a great ad for milk!!!!

Posted by at No comments:
I LIVE IN AN ESCHER PLACE OF STREETS GOING IN EVERY DIRECTION.

AN UNINOWN WONDER OF THE BAY AREA!

TODAY IS STILL THE DAY AFTER CHRISTMAS.

NOTHING HAS BEGAN EVEN THOUGH IT HAS.

JUST HERE TO CONTEMPLATE "REALITY" AND WONDER ABOUT WHAT ABOUT WHAT I MIGHT DO NEXT YEAR?

I BELIEVE BEING LESS SUCCESS ORIENTED AND NOT GOING AFTER FAME IS MY GAME.
Posted by at No comments:

A way to brighten your mind..

Is to question yourself as well as ask questions and have great past times to let your mind turn the information around in your mind.  The point is to be ready for the next moments, and to be clearly honest with yourself.  Fun is attractive, but it can hurt us also.  Dare to wonder and explore and figure.

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Is this a valuable chunk: Bottom line Your intuition matches a real interpretive layer of relativity: spacetime can be treated as a complete whole rather than a flowing process But it goes beyond current physics to say: that whole structure implies simple, fixed determinism of all events That middle gap—between geometry and outcomes—is exactly where modern theoretical physics is still incomplete. Yes — it’s a valuable chunk, but with some important caveats about how valuable and for what purpose. Why it is valuable That passage correctly captures a real distinction in modern general relativity: spacetime can be modeled as a complete 4D geometric structure (the “block” interpretation) but that does not automatically mean every event is simply “fixed deterministically” in the intuitive sense And it correctly identifies a real frontier issue: how spacetime geometry and physical outcome rules fit together at a deeper level That is an actual research gap in theoretical physics (especially when trying to unify gravity with microscopic physics in cosmology-level models). Why it needs tightening There are two places where it becomes slightly misleading: 1) “Interpretive layer of relativity” That’s fine, but it should be clearer that: the “block universe” is an interpretation, not a direct experimental prediction of relativity Relativity itself only gives: a geometric structure of spacetime not a claim about “flow” or “non-flow” of time. 2) “That implies simple fixed determinism” This is the delicate part. Even in a block-style spacetime: the global structure can exist without implying simple, classical determinism of all events Because outcome rules can still be: probabilistic locally (in modern physics descriptions) or constrained but not uniquely fixed by initial conditions alone So the implication you wrote is stronger than what physics requires. Why the “middle gap” line is actually strong This part is genuinely solid: “That middle gap—between geometry and outcomes—is where modern theoretical physics is incomplete.” That is accurate in spirit because: we do not yet have a fully unified description of spacetime + microscopic dynamics the interface between geometry and physical “events” is still an open problem in fundamental theory This is one of the motivations behind attempts at quantum gravity. Bottom line (refined evaluation) ✔ Good conceptual clarity ✔ Correctly distinguishes interpretation vs theory ✔ Correctly identifies a real unresolved frontier ⚠ Slight overstatement about determinism being implied If you wanted a sharper version A more precise rewrite would be: Spacetime in relativity can be modeled as a complete 4D structure, rather than a flowing process. However, this geometric view does not by itself determine how physical events are realized within that structure. The relationship between spacetime geometry and the rules governing outcomes remains an open problem in modern theoretical physics.