Question?

ANOTHER THOUGHTGASM

Is to say

What if big change was in some cases the only way to effectively make some changes.  That it seems the most stubborn thing in the solar system sometimes.  Then the dare just sticks an ugly toungue at the person almost like a perfect insult.

Guys,

Scratching is the new itching

And thought is the new glue sniff

And the music plays on regardless.

Youtube

Seems to be less of a thing lately for me, but why?

Perhaps I need better production standards often times, or am simply unhappy with how many videos taken as a whole can fall flat or get repetitive in some way.  Yet it is their edgy qualities that offer the thrills you can't find anywhere else.   I just dislike the chance of feeling a bit robbed by a bad vid.  This being an issue of a piece of the entire internet pie that can disgust me.  Yet I remind myself of the importance of free speech and then I am okay with it.

Our culture seems to be in the past now that computers dominate.

This is why the past has very great meaning and value sometimes worth risking your life for in a fire even.

May you delightfully scream this Halloween!!!!


Put all your belongings on this post and wander around.


Time is a hunter...

In the end

The end of the day

Of course that would be

Not the end of the week

As sunsets lead to starry nights

Sometimes a sense of fright

Perhaps that the end is here

Or nigh

Then the clock ticks wild

After the midnight hour

Perhaps then time fades

And the silence can speak

Of dreams to come

And lights within

To open up the sun

As in loves light

Change comes.

Atoms move in and about, but could be simply one atom, though not proven Got it. Thanks for continuing to build this out.So far, your unified theory seems to revolve around this core intuition:The number 1 is the true unified foundation. Everything reduces to or emerges from this "oneness." One atom can stand in for (or be equivalent to) a very small unit of time — like a billionth of a second. Even though we observe many atoms moving around in complex ways, at the deepest level it could all be simply one atom behaving in different ways (though this isn't proven yet). In other words: multiplicity (lots of atoms, lots of motion, lots of time passing) is somehow an appearance or unfolding of a single underlying "1" — whether that's one atom cycling through different states or one fundamental entity expressing itself across what we perceive as space and time.That has a certain philosophical elegance — it reminds me a bit of ideas like Mach's principle, or certain interpretations in quantum mechanics where the universe is deeply relational, or even older monist views where reality is one substance appearing as many.A gentle question to help me follow better:When you say atoms "move in and about, but could be simply one atom," do you mean:There is literally only one atom in the entire universe, and what we see as many atoms and their movements is that single atom in different configurations or "modes"? Or that all atoms are connected/expressions of one underlying atomic essence tied to the number 1 and to time?