Should the time skip

And the moon return

From the past

Brace yourself

Hell can not last

It is not acceptable

To accept any bells

That is not okay

Humans are not like that

Zombies yes

Humans no.
Posted by at No comments:
Missing an arm

Missing a hand

Missing a part of my heart

So surgery was performed

With a hanger

In a wine cellar

In Johannesburg

In a hut in the burbs

And it hurt

Because something's do

And the good news

Is the best is still ahead

Through new suns

History is changed

I can see you.
Posted by at No comments:
Was Shakespeare laughing

Still in his grave

Making dreams for those

Who have none

And standing loudly

He told insulting paradoxes

Cracking his will of jest

Till we loved eternally

In a moon lit comedy

His intentions for applause

Came suddenly

Roses rained at the parade

Till our tears were worthwhile

And then

I had to smile.
Posted by at No comments:
If dire consequences were sold

In creepy dime stores

Would you choose my favorite hat

And would my hat bring fame

Maybe because it rotated

Or had a mouth

Perhaps I was just rolling

Going into obsolete places

Acting like a chair was a person.

You sold my hat

I hugged you in person.
Posted by at No comments:
Enter was the last word I heard

It was something I was feeling

As if you could hold water

As if you could hold me

I  Sat in my study

Trying to remember

Only something funny came

As if getting pied in the face

Leaving is always like coming

You can't recall it perfectly

Those simple times

I could not evoke.
Posted by at No comments:
Stars are not miles apart

Ideas can happen fully

Glass breaking through the ceiling

Holding you in the palm of my hand

Photos of better days

Mold and mildew have their place

To smoke smoke out a rat

And eat empty calories

In my helium balloon running

Breaking the cello in two

Finding a mission of love

Cravings go beyond the kitchen
Posted by at No comments:
Call it what you like

You can say what you like

People like to a lot of things

To beat their fists

The enemy is fear itself

Breaking is like violence

Like breaking an egg

Or smashing an omelet

Love is the only great virtue

I know of

Laugh all you want

The beating heart is a wave of fire

Of love and life

I know you

Like all the others

It gets better soon

Lily in my hand for you

I can hold my breath

Dives into the depths

Like an unstoppable force

I'm on my way

Braving the beauty of change.
Posted by at No comments:
The sun is a keeper

Light can keep the dark out

It dives into the water

Playing light ripples delight

As if a painted Angel

Jumped from frescoes

In old cafes they can see

All the blue mascara

The necklace that chained the imagination

A building opening its doors

Dreams spreading like a virus

Lips shut mind wide open
Posted by at No comments:
You never know with slaves

Since they are an unknown

Slaves in other places

Cities full of slavery

Where only stars exist

Some would notice the moon cycles

With burning fingers

Holding themselves near a chain fence

They dream of a deck of cards

Playing with yarn

Shooting marbles on the rug

Lazy days doing nothing

And playing crocket

And you got to love uncle Sam
Posted by at No comments:
There you find me climbing vines

It is wise to climb into the trees

Finding a lost paradise

A park which would hide

To surrender every Barbie doll

To strip Ken to nothing

Is like flipping switches

In a chocolate covered room

So stands the wine bottle

Into the night

Bringing in the women

With tinker bell

Some folk can folk dance

Some are busy thinking food thoughts.
Posted by at No comments:
Intestines rarely show up in romantic films

But ideal lips and foreheads feature kindly

Lips that are not just for speaking role

But lip seeking roles

Like heat seeking torpedo lips

Lips which hunger as they lick

Large luscious lips with lollipops

Women with neon tube tops

Women who knock themselves into aerobics classes

Women who can explain thing

While wearing black spandex

And look at you as if you

Are made from tissue

Or toilet paper

So you ask her to be gentle

Just in case she wipes you!
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Does gravity create reality? A shocking path to a theory of everything A rewrite of quantum mechanics that includes the force of gravity could finally achieve one of physicists’ biggest goals and reveal the ultimate fuzziness of time By Zack Savitsky 25 May 2026 ES Leer en Español New Scientist. Science news and long reads from expert journalists, covering developments in science, technology, health and the environment on the website and the magazine. Ryan Wills Sometimes, you work tirelessly on a problem, only to realise you have been going about it all backwards. Imagine trying to fit a massive antique piano through a tiny doorway. You have tried everything – rotating it, removing the legs, forceful shoving – but you just can’t get it to fit. Eventually, you realise it is easier to construct a room to house the piano where it already sits. Now, some physicists are grappling with a similar rethink. For decades, the accepted route to an ultimate theory of everything has involved taking our best theory of gravity and squeezing it into the frame of quantum mechanics. Given that quantum theory is wildly successful in describing the other three of the four fundamental forces of nature, it is an understandable approach. Yet, almost a century later, scientists still haven’t managed to make gravity fit. That’s why a few mavericks have championed an alternative strategy. They suggest that tweaking the equations of quantum mechanics – constructing a new room for gravity – helps explain how the strange world of particles gives rise to our everyday reality. Advertisement Various experimental avenues are opening up to probe this approach, involving everything from levitating diamonds and glowing metals to swinging pendulums and ticking clocks. The tests promise to shine a light on how the quantum world operates and guide the search for a more complete understanding of the universe. “This is like going into the open ocean: we have no clue where to go,” says Angelo Bassi, a physicist at the University of Trieste in Italy. “But maybe … by going in the wrong direction, we’ll discover the right thing.” Read more We've discovered a door to a hidden part of reality – what's inside? The world as we know it is definite. Your books rest solidly on their shelf, your clock ticks steadily forward and your cat is demonstrably alive. In the realm of atoms, however, nothing is certain. Quantum mechanics allows us to describe certain properties of particles, like their position, only in terms of likelihood. You can predict – with great success – the odds of finding a particle in one of many places, but where it will be observed in a given test is completely unknowable. Before that measurement happens, the object exists in a wave-like blur of all those possibilities at once, which we describe mathematically with something called a wave function. Subscriber-only newsletter Sign up to Lost in Space-Time Untangle mind-bending physics, maths and the weirdness of reality with our monthly, special-guest-written newsletter. Sign up to newsletter New Scientist. Science news and long reads from expert journalists, covering developments in science, technology, health and the environment on the website and the magazine. This leaves us with two big conundrums that lie at the heart of quantum theory. For one, it is unclear how and when the fuzzy quantum world gives rise to classical concreteness. The other problem is that this probabilistic description clashes with Albert Einstein’s classical understanding of gravity. Efforts to recast Einstein’s work on gravity into the language of forces and particles have resulted in constructions such as string theory that are cumbersome and practically untestable. A long-standing assumption has been that, deep down, everything is quantum. But a century after the inception of quantum mechanics, physicists are still struggling to make a cohesive story out of it. “There must be something else going on, and we have to understand what,” says Bassi. “The important step is to push quantum mechanics to its limits.” One route to finding these limits involves one of the many oddities of quantum mechanics: the principle of superposition. Scientists today routinely put a single particle into a mixed state of being in two distinct locations, a trick they can verify with interference patterns from those interacting possibilities. But once they measure where the particle is, it collapses into one definitive state: either left or right, say. There are many possible explanations of what happens when a measurement occurs – as evidenced by the variety of interpretations of quantum mechanics. The many-worlds interpretation says that each possible scenario plays out in a different branch of reality, while the Copenhagen interpretation says, essentially, to trust the maths. A skydiver, skydiving Some physicists want to adapt quantum mechanics to include the classical force of gravity Hans Berggren/Getty Images Another group of explanations searches for a physical solution. In the 1980s, physicists Giancarlo Ghirardi, Alberto Rimini and Tullio Weber proposed that some invisible process was tampering with quantum waves, causing them to suddenly collapse. In the following years, physicist Lajos Diósi at the Wigner Research Centre for Physics in Hungary and University of Oxford mathematician Roger Penrose proposed that gravity could be a culprit for this mysterious process. Essentially, the Diósi-Penrose model argues that, in the battle between quantum and gravity, quantum cracks first. The basic premise the pair set out was that putting a large mass into a superposition would force space-time to curve in two different ways – something it cannot permit. They proposed that the integrity of space-time prevails and causes the quantum waves to collapse. If this is the case, superpositions would have a lifetime that is inversely proportional to the square of their mass. Quantum objects could live in a superposition for very long periods of time, but the larger the object was, the faster it would collapse. This would explain why we never see larger objects in superposition – because their substantial gravitational tug would instantly force a collapse. It also tackles the thorny problem of measurement, because any device large enough to detect and relay information about a quantum system would become part of that system and disturb it gravitationally. This idea moved the discussion away from merely interpreting quantum theory and instead towards revising it.