Life and portraiture are, in some way, remarkably alike. Both are acts of accepting things that don't go as planned, while still wishing to "preserve this moment." In life, there are hardly ever any perfect moments. There is hesitation, contradiction, and incompleteness. Portraiture is the same: if it's just neatly arranged and beautiful, for some reason, it doesn't linger in the heart. A slightly crooked smile. A fleeting moment of averted gaze. A silence that words can't capture. It is in such "imperfections" that the time and emotions a person has lived seep through. That's why I think portraiture isn't just about recording youth or beauty, but about trying to capture "how that person is living." And for the one taking the photo, too, their view of life appears directly in the image. Those who want to dominate others take photos that feel somehow stifling. Those who want to understand others take photos in which the subject can breathe easy. Those who know loneliness try to capture the emotions within the silence. In other words, portraiture may be a world where, even before the camera's capabilities, "how one faces and lives with people" is what gets reflected. The more carefully one gazes at life, the more one can notice people's small emotions. The more one has experienced being hurt, the more one can see someone's vulnerability as beautiful. That's why living life fully and taking deep portraits are surely connected. I think taking a photo of a person isn't just capturing their face, but quietly affirming "you exist here."

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Supporting Antifa in an educational context would amplify the anti-democratic nature of ideological capture to a dangerous degree. Antifa's core characteristics Antifa is a loose, decentralized far-left militant movement that explicitly rejects liberal democracy in favor of direct action, deplatforming, and sometimes violence to combat perceived fascism. It opposes free speech for opponents, views institutions (including schools) as tools for revolutionary change, and often aligns with anarchist or accelerationist tactics. Open support for it goes beyond standard left politics into endorsing extra-legal methods.Why educator or institutional support crosses a line Undermines the rule of law — Public schools are state institutions bound by democratic norms (elections, due process, free expression under the First Amendment). Teachers or curricula that fantasize, romanticize, excuse, or promote Antifa-style tactics (property destruction, no-platforming, "by any means necessary") teach contempt for democratic mechanisms. This is especially toxic for youth, who are still forming civic habits. Heightens indoctrination risk — In captured systems (e.g., activist factions within unions like Oakland Education Association), materials that frame Antifa sympathetically as heroic resisters fit the pattern of one-sided narratives. We've seen unauthorized "teach-ins" and "liberatory education" pushes in Oakland and similar districts that critics argue veer into political activism rather than balanced analysis. Glorifying militant groups adds an endorsement of violence to ideological skew. rethinkingschools.org Disproportionate harm — For less-educated or captive audiences (K-12 students), this normalizes extremism. It can desensitize youth to political violence, chill dissent in classrooms, and erode trust in democratic institutions. Post-2020 riots and campus disruptions showed real-world spillover. Anti-democratic double standard — Democracy allows debate over ideas, even radical ones. But state-funded educators actively supporting a movement that rejects debate itself (via doxxing, riots, or "punch a Nazi" rhetoric that expands "Nazi" to include mainstream conservatives) is viewpoint discrimination with state power behind it. It's the opposite of pluralism. Reality checkNot every progressive educator supports Antifa—many explicitly reject its violence. Direct endorsements in official curricula are rare and often opposed by districts when publicized. However, tolerance or soft-pedaling in activist teacher circles, reading lists that lionize radical left figures, or failure to condemn Antifa-linked tactics does occur in highly polarized blue-city environments and feeds the capture critique.This would make the problem not just bias, but incitement against democratic norms. Reforms emphasizing classical civics, viewpoint balance, and strict political neutrality in K-12 become even more urgent. Public education should prepare citizens for democracy, not recruit for its rejection..