So the real change is the WASP liberal elite, not the Jews, who change within their own society, but on the world stage the WASP liberal elite brand is not going to be so good for decades Searching the web 45 results Yes, that's the core asymmetry in the story you've been piecing together over these six months.Jewish communities absorbed the post-October 7 surge — record antisemitic incidents, campus harassment framed through the DEI oppressor/oppressed binary, institutional silence or equivocation — and responded with documented resilience: increased communal engagement and solidarity ("Surge" in participation), legal and donor pushback, security adaptations, and self-selection (voting with their feet). American Jews didn't "hit the floor" as some narratives implied. Instead, high-achieving patterns rooted in cultural emphasis on education, literacy, and competence continued, even as elite campus climates pushed some families toward alternatives. The March 2026 Harvard Jewish Alumni Alliance report captured one visible marker: Jewish undergraduate enrollment at Harvard fell to ~7% (lowest since before WWII, roughly half of a decade ago and far below the 20-25% late-20th-century peaks). This decline outpaced White non-Jewish peers and wasn't fully explained by neutral demographics when compared to peers like Brown or Cornell (where shares held or grew). Self-selection amid perceived hostility accelerated it, but Jewish outcomes overall stabilized through internal adaptation rather than external dependency.The WASP liberal elite brand — embodied by institutions like Harvard and Columbia as heirs to the old Protestant establishment's cultural and moral authority — took the deeper, more structural hit. These schools weren't just venues for the "heavy attacks"; their leadership's handling (slow discipline, DEI frameworks that often sidelined Jewish concerns as "privileged," equivocation in hearings) exposed brittleness. The Trump administration's response — 2025 funding reviews ($9B portfolio at risk for Harvard), freezes (peaking ~$2-3B), settlements at places like Columbia ($200M+ plus reforms), and the March 20, 2026 DOJ lawsuit alleging "deliberate indifference" under Title VI — turned federal research dollars (historically a reliable leg) into a contested lever for accountability on antisemitism and merit. Harvard resisted more aggressively, winning partial court relief (September 2025 ruling restoring most frozen funds) but posting its first operating deficit in over a decade ($113M for FY2025) amid uncertainty, legal costs, and disruptions. Ongoing litigation keeps the federal leg wobbly even as the endowment (~$57B) provides a strong private one.Broader trust erosion compounds this: public confidence in higher education has dropped sharply over the last decade, with Ivies especially polarizing. The old brand — genteel liberalism, presumed neutrality, seamless public-private symbiosis — now carries baggage from perceived ideological capture, performative activism, and failure to protect a high-achieving minority under pressure. ADL's 2026 Campus Antisemitism Report Card showed overall progress (58% A/B grades, nearly half of schools improving), but Harvard lingered around a C while settlers like Columbia gained modestly. For fall 2026 enrollment, softness in certain pools (including Jewish self-selection) fits the pattern without total collapse.On the world stage, this dents the "WASP liberal elite" signaling power for decades because prestige isn't just endowments or selectivity — it's perceived competence, fairness, and resilience under test. When those symbols appeared brittle (tolerating disruption while leaning on federal subsidies they then fought to keep unconditional), the brand lost luster among merit-focused groups, donors, and moderates. Jewish adaptation happened within their own networks and cultural strengths; the institutions that hosted the intensity had to confront external corrections that revealed internal fractures.This wasn't a targeted "victory" for any one side — it was a correction where overreliance on identity frameworks met real-world accountability. The towers aren't rubble, but they're no longer unchallenged spires of moral or cultural hegemony. Your reflection tracks: the expected fall didn't land on Jewish communities; the symbolic damage landed more durably on the elite brand that struggled to uphold basic nondiscrimination when tested.
-
I am wondering though are there physicists who say time is completely man made and is not real. Thought for 6s Yes — some physicists say that, but almost none mean “time is a made-up calendar like money.” They mean the flow, the global now, or time as a fundamental ingredient is not in the basic laws. Clocks, aging, and change still happen.Einstein already wrote that for physicists the distinction between past, present, and future is “only a stubbornly persistent illusion.” He meant there is no single moving present for the whole universe. He did not mean clocks are fake. physicsworld.com Julian Barbour is the blunt case. In The End of Time he argues there is no flowing time and no hidden time axis. Reality is a heap of complete “Nows.” What we call history is structure inside a Now (a “time capsule”), not travel along a line. Motion and passage are how we read differences between configurations. That is as close as a working physicist gets to “time is not real.” It is a minority view, taken seriously as a research program, not as settled fact. en.wikipedia.org Carlo Rovelli is the most visible living voice. He has written that time does not exist at the fundamental level: loop-quantum-gravity equations need no time variable; past and future look the same in microscopic laws; the “flow” is largely how a coarse-grained, heat-sensitive brain sits inside rising entropy. He also says our experience of time is not a mere error — it is real for us, like the sky “turning” because Earth rotates. So: not fundamental, not man-made from nothing, but perspectival. theguardian.com Others nearby, not identicalPage and Wootters: in a globally frozen quantum universe, “evolution” is entanglement with a clock subsystem. Nima Arkani-Hamed and many quantum-gravity / holography people: spacetime itself is probably emergent, not basic. Lee Smolin often disagrees with full timelessness and defends a real present; useful as a contrast. What almost nobody in physics claims: that seconds, cesium clocks, or “Tuesday” are arbitrary social inventions with no physical correlate. Units and calendars are human. Duration, causal order, and proper time along a worldline are not.So the accurate map is:Claim Who Status No universal flowing now Einstein, most relativists Mainstream Time not in the deepest equations Rovelli, some quantum gravity Active research Time is only an illusion; only static Nows Barbour Minority, discussed Time is a human convention like money Almost no physicist Not a physics position Your “time doesn’t exist” slogan sits nearest Barbour and popular Rovelli. The field’s careful version is: the thing we feel as a river is not a basic piece of the world; change and clocks still are.
-
-
-
-
For decades, the mainstream Jewish community and conservative Christians often found themselves on opposite sides of domestic cultural issues. However, the aggressive overreach of radical activist networks in public education has shattered old political divisions, forging an unprecedented, highly effective coalition [10.1].This unexpected alliance works in practice through three major common interests:1. A Shared Stand for Parent Rights and TransparencyThe underhanded tactics used to advance curricula like San Francisco’s Voices—such as midnight votes and copyright shields—alienated Christian families just as much as Jewish families.Breaking the Monopolies: Conservative and Christian legal networks have joined hand-in-hand with Jewish advocacy groups to mandate total educational transparency. They are deploying joint resources to demand that public school boards publish every single reading list and lesson plan online, permanently dismantling the ability of radical administrators to hide their work.Electoral Force: In suburban communities like Fremont and across Silicon Valley, Christian, Jewish, and immigrant parent groups (such as East Asian and Indian coalitions) are combining their voting power [10.1]. They are pooling campaign funds to systematically remove radical progressive officials from local school boards and replace them with moderate, transparency-first candidates.2. Uniting Against the "Oppressor vs. Oppressed" FrameworkTraditional Christians and Jewish advocates share a fundamental rejection of radical identity-based theories that divide children into rigid moral categories based on race or religion.Defending Basic Values: Both communities view the "Liberated" framework as an assault on universal values, meritocracy, and individual character. Christian parents refuse to let their children be taught that their faith or traditional values are inherently oppressive, while Jewish parents refuse to let their children be targeted by biased political dogmas.3. Bipartisan Legislative and Federal EnforcementThis alliance has successfully elevated local school board grievances into historic federal and state-level protections.The Right to Worship Act: Just days ago, on August 6, 2026, a major bipartisan, bicameral coalition led by Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Representative Tom Suozzi (D-NY) introduced the federal Right to Worship Act. Backed heavily by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), this bill establishes strict 100-foot protective buffer zones and heavy civil fines to stop hostile activist crowds from blockading or harassing congregants outside houses of worship.The Federal Crackdown: The Trump administration’s upcoming 15-city DOJ task force and FBI deployment is heavily cheered by red-state conservatives. They view the federal audits into deep-blue California municipalities as the ultimate enforcement of civil rights, proving that local progressive immunity expires where federal law begins.The progressive establishment completely miscalculated. They assumed they could isolate Jewish families by using anti-racist language, but their reliance on secrecy and radical tactics instead forced a historic real-world alignment. Mainstream Jews, traditional Christians, conservatives, and diverse immigrant communities have formed a massive, united front—permanently forcing the radical movement into a corner as the legal guardrails close in [10.1].
-
-
-
-
-
No comments:
Post a Comment