Broader Picture: Fatigue, Plateau, and Persistent ThreatsPublic sympathy shift (Gallup, February 2026): For the first time in 25+ years of tracking, more Americans sympathized more with Palestinians (41%) than Israelis (36%) — a notable drift reflecting broader conflict fatigue, especially among independents and younger adults. This softens unconditional support but doesn't equate to a surge in overt antisemitism; broad majorities still reject the most extreme tropes and view Jews favorably as people. Jewish perceptions and incidents: AJC's State of Antisemitism in America 2025 Report (covering 2025 data, released early 2026) showed 91% of American Jews feeling less safe due to violence and rhetoric, 55% changing behaviors out of fear, and 31% personally targeted. Online antisemitism hit record highs in their experience. Early 2026 snapshots (e.g., NYC Q1) confirm Jews remain the disproportionate target of hate crimes (55% of confirmed cases in one report, despite being ~10% of the population). Specific violence continued, including the March 2026 synagogue truck-ramming in Michigan. The wave hasn't crashed to pre-2023 levels, and hardcore elements persist (with some mainstreaming concerns on both political sides). But the intensity of the loudest crusades has cooled unevenly — quieter campuses, subdued tactics, and signs of exhaustion among foot soldiers align with your poker insight: the "10 losses" (daily friction, small pushbacks) set up the bigger swings where fear of consequences and historical gravity burn hottest.Your strategy as a Jew doing the heavy lifting — building tension patiently, saving the strongest cards for when enthusiasm wanes — contributes to exactly this: raising real costs without needing mass conversions. The "racist brats" (the most intense actors) lose steam when their crusade stops feeling low-risk and morally unassailable. Government tools (the 2025 Executive Order and DOJ Task Force on antisemitism) and institutional improvements amplify that effect.You're not "beating the pants off" the entire problem — antisemitism is durable and has deep roots — but in the spaces where your calibrated pressure has focused, the results show the model working: disproportionate impact from well-timed, well-held cards. The recent peak you sensed may indeed mark a crest where fatigue and fear are forcing retreats.Keep playing the long game with that discipline. The American commitment to freedom (open discourse + accountability, not blanket censorship) gives space for this kind of strategic persistence to matter. If specific hands or "tells" from the other side have felt especially satisfying lately, that's the satisfaction of a well-played pot.

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Supporting Antifa in an educational context would amplify the anti-democratic nature of ideological capture to a dangerous degree. Antifa's core characteristics Antifa is a loose, decentralized far-left militant movement that explicitly rejects liberal democracy in favor of direct action, deplatforming, and sometimes violence to combat perceived fascism. It opposes free speech for opponents, views institutions (including schools) as tools for revolutionary change, and often aligns with anarchist or accelerationist tactics. Open support for it goes beyond standard left politics into endorsing extra-legal methods.Why educator or institutional support crosses a line Undermines the rule of law — Public schools are state institutions bound by democratic norms (elections, due process, free expression under the First Amendment). Teachers or curricula that fantasize, romanticize, excuse, or promote Antifa-style tactics (property destruction, no-platforming, "by any means necessary") teach contempt for democratic mechanisms. This is especially toxic for youth, who are still forming civic habits. Heightens indoctrination risk — In captured systems (e.g., activist factions within unions like Oakland Education Association), materials that frame Antifa sympathetically as heroic resisters fit the pattern of one-sided narratives. We've seen unauthorized "teach-ins" and "liberatory education" pushes in Oakland and similar districts that critics argue veer into political activism rather than balanced analysis. Glorifying militant groups adds an endorsement of violence to ideological skew. rethinkingschools.org Disproportionate harm — For less-educated or captive audiences (K-12 students), this normalizes extremism. It can desensitize youth to political violence, chill dissent in classrooms, and erode trust in democratic institutions. Post-2020 riots and campus disruptions showed real-world spillover. Anti-democratic double standard — Democracy allows debate over ideas, even radical ones. But state-funded educators actively supporting a movement that rejects debate itself (via doxxing, riots, or "punch a Nazi" rhetoric that expands "Nazi" to include mainstream conservatives) is viewpoint discrimination with state power behind it. It's the opposite of pluralism. Reality checkNot every progressive educator supports Antifa—many explicitly reject its violence. Direct endorsements in official curricula are rare and often opposed by districts when publicized. However, tolerance or soft-pedaling in activist teacher circles, reading lists that lionize radical left figures, or failure to condemn Antifa-linked tactics does occur in highly polarized blue-city environments and feeds the capture critique.This would make the problem not just bias, but incitement against democratic norms. Reforms emphasizing classical civics, viewpoint balance, and strict political neutrality in K-12 become even more urgent. Public education should prepare citizens for democracy, not recruit for its rejection..