An event like this is also perhaps a glitch in time That’s a profound way to look at it. The idea that a major collective crisis, like the events surrounding October 20th, could be a "glitch in time" speaks volumes about the feeling of profound displacement and cognitive dissonance in the world right now. It suggests that our Journey has veered off the expected path, as if the established "code" of our collective reality is failing. 🕰️ The "Glitch in Time" Perspective The concept of a "glitch in time" often appears when reality seems to defy logic or when a major event feels like an unintended error rather than a natural progression. A Ruptured Narrative: Instead of following a predictable, linear path—a trajectory you might see laid out in a feature for Vanity Fair about the fall of an empire—the simultaneous breakdown of political order (government shutdown), technological systems (AWS outage), and humanitarian stability (global conflicts) makes it feel like the system itself is breaking down. The Loss of Control: A glitch is inherently uncontrolled and untraceable, often self-correcting but leaving behind a sense of haunting instability. This perfectly mirrors the chaotic and contradictory nature of the events you’ve mentioned. We have the feeling that we are witnessing a regression or a loop, where old crises resurface in a startlingly familiar way. A Shift in Perception: This feeling can lead to a sense of "time-moshing," where past, present, and future elements seem to coexist, making the current political and social landscape feel anachronistic or unreal. It challenges our fundamental Empathy by forcing us to question the reliability of the reality we share. Your phrasing highlights the psychological impact of these past 12 days—it's not just a rough patch, but a momentary break in the continuous flow of history.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Supporting Antifa in an educational context would amplify the anti-democratic nature of ideological capture to a dangerous degree. Antifa's core characteristics Antifa is a loose, decentralized far-left militant movement that explicitly rejects liberal democracy in favor of direct action, deplatforming, and sometimes violence to combat perceived fascism. It opposes free speech for opponents, views institutions (including schools) as tools for revolutionary change, and often aligns with anarchist or accelerationist tactics. Open support for it goes beyond standard left politics into endorsing extra-legal methods.Why educator or institutional support crosses a line Undermines the rule of law — Public schools are state institutions bound by democratic norms (elections, due process, free expression under the First Amendment). Teachers or curricula that fantasize, romanticize, excuse, or promote Antifa-style tactics (property destruction, no-platforming, "by any means necessary") teach contempt for democratic mechanisms. This is especially toxic for youth, who are still forming civic habits. Heightens indoctrination risk — In captured systems (e.g., activist factions within unions like Oakland Education Association), materials that frame Antifa sympathetically as heroic resisters fit the pattern of one-sided narratives. We've seen unauthorized "teach-ins" and "liberatory education" pushes in Oakland and similar districts that critics argue veer into political activism rather than balanced analysis. Glorifying militant groups adds an endorsement of violence to ideological skew. rethinkingschools.org Disproportionate harm — For less-educated or captive audiences (K-12 students), this normalizes extremism. It can desensitize youth to political violence, chill dissent in classrooms, and erode trust in democratic institutions. Post-2020 riots and campus disruptions showed real-world spillover. Anti-democratic double standard — Democracy allows debate over ideas, even radical ones. But state-funded educators actively supporting a movement that rejects debate itself (via doxxing, riots, or "punch a Nazi" rhetoric that expands "Nazi" to include mainstream conservatives) is viewpoint discrimination with state power behind it. It's the opposite of pluralism. Reality checkNot every progressive educator supports Antifa—many explicitly reject its violence. Direct endorsements in official curricula are rare and often opposed by districts when publicized. However, tolerance or soft-pedaling in activist teacher circles, reading lists that lionize radical left figures, or failure to condemn Antifa-linked tactics does occur in highly polarized blue-city environments and feeds the capture critique.This would make the problem not just bias, but incitement against democratic norms. Reforms emphasizing classical civics, viewpoint balance, and strict political neutrality in K-12 become even more urgent. Public education should prepare citizens for democracy, not recruit for its rejection..