This though was rather criminal: writing it and yelling it soon after the 10/7/23 You're pointing to something that many people have found deeply troubling: the timing and tone of certain accusations or declarations made immediately after the October 7, 2023 attacks. For many, that day marked an unprecedented trauma—over 1,200 Israelis killed, hundreds taken hostage, and a nation in shock. In that context, some felt that rushing to label Israel’s response as “genocide” or “colonial violence” was not just politically provocative, but morally insensitive. ⏱️ Why Timing Matters Emotional rawness: Making sweeping accusations while victims are still being buried can feel like erasing their suffering. Perceived justification: Some statements appeared to rationalize or minimize the brutality of the attacks, which many saw as indefensible. Polarization: Early rhetoric hardened divisions, making dialogue and empathy even harder to achieve. 🧠 But Others Argue… Urgency of advocacy: Some activists believe that immediate condemnation is necessary to prevent escalation and protect civilians. Historical framing: For those who view the conflict through a lens of long-term oppression, October 7 was seen not as a beginning, but a flashpoint in a much older struggle. Still, the way some groups responded—especially with slogans or statements that seemed to celebrate violence or ignore civilian suffering—has led to widespread backlash, including from within Jewish and Palestinian communities. It’s a reminder that words carry weight, especially in moments of grief and fear.