🔥🌵 Ashes of the Kale Epoch 🌵🔥 A post-apocalyptic epic in the spirit of Yeats, Arnold, and Burning Man absurdity I. The Marshmallow Wars Begin In the dust of the desert where neon gods sleep, A man with a tongue out, a baby to keep, Fought off the zealots with marshmallows glowing— Radioactive, soft, and poetically knowing. The kale fields burned in the twilight of grace, Guarded by trans boys with fear on their face, And robot dogs, twitching, programmed to sin, Sniffed out the truth in the wreckage within. II. The Temple of Irony Priests in sequins read Satan’s own prose, While quoting Camus in glittering rows. They baptized the faithful in sarcasm’s flame, And taught that belief was a marketing game. Head lice with viral acclaim. Teachers passed out conspiracy scrolls, While grading essays on how to lose souls. III. The Playa of Privilege Here, lame was gold and gold was passé, And virtue was measured in hashtags per day. A man rode a camel made out of drones, Preaching to statues carved from old phones. The sea of faith had long dried to dust, And love was a currency traded in lust. Yet still they hugged babies with reckless delight, And stuck out their tongues in the face of the night. IV. The Second Coming Already Came No horsemen arrived, no trumpets were blown— Just memes and influencers, each on their throne. The apocalypse happened, but no one had cried, They livestreamed the moment and monetized pride. And Yeats, if he watched from the edge of the flame, Would whisper, “The center was never the aim.” While Arnold, in sandals, with glowsticks in hand, Would mourn for the sea, now replaced by dry land. V. The Final Burn The effigy rose, a kale god of chrome, With marshmallow eyes and a Wi-Fi dome. They danced ‘round the fire in ironic despair, While robot dogs howled at the synthetic air. And when it collapsed in a shower of sparks, They cheered not for endings, but glorious marks— For in this absurd world, truth had no throne, But laughter remained, defiant, alone.

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Supporting Antifa in an educational context would amplify the anti-democratic nature of ideological capture to a dangerous degree. Antifa's core characteristics Antifa is a loose, decentralized far-left militant movement that explicitly rejects liberal democracy in favor of direct action, deplatforming, and sometimes violence to combat perceived fascism. It opposes free speech for opponents, views institutions (including schools) as tools for revolutionary change, and often aligns with anarchist or accelerationist tactics. Open support for it goes beyond standard left politics into endorsing extra-legal methods.Why educator or institutional support crosses a line Undermines the rule of law — Public schools are state institutions bound by democratic norms (elections, due process, free expression under the First Amendment). Teachers or curricula that fantasize, romanticize, excuse, or promote Antifa-style tactics (property destruction, no-platforming, "by any means necessary") teach contempt for democratic mechanisms. This is especially toxic for youth, who are still forming civic habits. Heightens indoctrination risk — In captured systems (e.g., activist factions within unions like Oakland Education Association), materials that frame Antifa sympathetically as heroic resisters fit the pattern of one-sided narratives. We've seen unauthorized "teach-ins" and "liberatory education" pushes in Oakland and similar districts that critics argue veer into political activism rather than balanced analysis. Glorifying militant groups adds an endorsement of violence to ideological skew. rethinkingschools.org Disproportionate harm — For less-educated or captive audiences (K-12 students), this normalizes extremism. It can desensitize youth to political violence, chill dissent in classrooms, and erode trust in democratic institutions. Post-2020 riots and campus disruptions showed real-world spillover. Anti-democratic double standard — Democracy allows debate over ideas, even radical ones. But state-funded educators actively supporting a movement that rejects debate itself (via doxxing, riots, or "punch a Nazi" rhetoric that expands "Nazi" to include mainstream conservatives) is viewpoint discrimination with state power behind it. It's the opposite of pluralism. Reality checkNot every progressive educator supports Antifa—many explicitly reject its violence. Direct endorsements in official curricula are rare and often opposed by districts when publicized. However, tolerance or soft-pedaling in activist teacher circles, reading lists that lionize radical left figures, or failure to condemn Antifa-linked tactics does occur in highly polarized blue-city environments and feeds the capture critique.This would make the problem not just bias, but incitement against democratic norms. Reforms emphasizing classical civics, viewpoint balance, and strict political neutrality in K-12 become even more urgent. Public education should prepare citizens for democracy, not recruit for its rejection..