These states join others like Kansas, Ohio, Florida, Texas, Virginia, Tennessee, and Arizona in using IHRA as a framework for: Defining antisemitism in hate crime investigations Shaping campus and K–12 education policy Guiding law enforcement and public awareness training You can explore the full, regularly updated list on the Combat Antisemitism Movement’s IHRA adoption tracker. Want to zoom in on how one of these states is applying IHRA in schools or law enforcement? I can dig into that next. Edit in a page More You got it—here’s a deeper dive into more U.S. states that have adopted or endorsed the IHRA working definition of antisemitism as of 2025: 🗺️ Additional States That Have Taken Action State Action Type Kentucky Passed legislation endorsing IHRA in 2025 Missouri Adopted IHRA and integrated it into education policy Nebraska Aligned school codes with IHRA standards Oklahoma Requires public schools to appoint antisemitism coordinators using IHRA South Carolina Early adopter via executive action Arkansas Legislative adoption with interfaith engagement Utah Passed a resolution affirming IHRA New Jersey Currently debating IHRA adoption; legislation has strong support but remains pending2 🧭 National Snapshot According to the Combat Antisemitism Movement, as of February 2025: 37 U.S. states have adopted or endorsed the IHRA definition 98 city and county governments have done the same The U.S. federal government has endorsed it, though legislation to codify it into federal law remains under debate This growing adoption reflects a national trend toward clarity in defining antisemitism, especially in education, law enforcement, and public policy. Would you like to explore which cities within these states have followed suit—or how this is playing out on college campuses? Edit in a page Name all 37 states Here’s the full list of 37 U.S. states that have adopted or endorsed the IHRA (International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance) working definition of antisemitism as of early 2025, according to the Combat Antisemitism Movement: 🗺️ States That Have Adopted the IHRA Definition Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas Colorado Connecticut Florida Georgia Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Mexico North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Virginia

No comments:

Post a Comment

Atoms move in and about, but could be simply one atom, though not proven Got it. Thanks for continuing to build this out.So far, your unified theory seems to revolve around this core intuition:The number 1 is the true unified foundation. Everything reduces to or emerges from this "oneness." One atom can stand in for (or be equivalent to) a very small unit of time — like a billionth of a second. Even though we observe many atoms moving around in complex ways, at the deepest level it could all be simply one atom behaving in different ways (though this isn't proven yet). In other words: multiplicity (lots of atoms, lots of motion, lots of time passing) is somehow an appearance or unfolding of a single underlying "1" — whether that's one atom cycling through different states or one fundamental entity expressing itself across what we perceive as space and time.That has a certain philosophical elegance — it reminds me a bit of ideas like Mach's principle, or certain interpretations in quantum mechanics where the universe is deeply relational, or even older monist views where reality is one substance appearing as many.A gentle question to help me follow better:When you say atoms "move in and about, but could be simply one atom," do you mean:There is literally only one atom in the entire universe, and what we see as many atoms and their movements is that single atom in different configurations or "modes"? Or that all atoms are connected/expressions of one underlying atomic essence tied to the number 1 and to time?