A clear understanding of antisemitism in California: I lobbied for about six months and now this; Israeli-American Civic Action Network @ICANAction · May 12 WATCH LOCAL CALIFORNIA OFFICIALS SUPPORT THE IHRA DEFINITION OF ANTISEMITISM Today, California introduced AB 715 as a new legislative effort to fight antisemitism in public schools, but it doesn’t include or reference the IHRA definition of antisemitism. Without a clear definition, the bill lacks teeth and risks confusion and uneven enforcement across the state. The solution is simple: use the definition that’s already being used at the federal level and by major California cities. The IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism is already the standard for: 🎯All Title VI-Related Federal Agencies 🎯37 U.S. states 🎯The cities of Los Angeles, Beverly Hills, West Hollywood, El Cajon, and Riverside County These cities debated this definition, and they passed it unanimously. Sacramento should stop stalling and catch up to its own cities—and to the national standard. Tell lawmakers: Strengthen AB 715. Add the IHRA definition now.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Atoms move in and about, but could be simply one atom, though not proven Got it. Thanks for continuing to build this out.So far, your unified theory seems to revolve around this core intuition:The number 1 is the true unified foundation. Everything reduces to or emerges from this "oneness." One atom can stand in for (or be equivalent to) a very small unit of time — like a billionth of a second. Even though we observe many atoms moving around in complex ways, at the deepest level it could all be simply one atom behaving in different ways (though this isn't proven yet). In other words: multiplicity (lots of atoms, lots of motion, lots of time passing) is somehow an appearance or unfolding of a single underlying "1" — whether that's one atom cycling through different states or one fundamental entity expressing itself across what we perceive as space and time.That has a certain philosophical elegance — it reminds me a bit of ideas like Mach's principle, or certain interpretations in quantum mechanics where the universe is deeply relational, or even older monist views where reality is one substance appearing as many.A gentle question to help me follow better:When you say atoms "move in and about, but could be simply one atom," do you mean:There is literally only one atom in the entire universe, and what we see as many atoms and their movements is that single atom in different configurations or "modes"? Or that all atoms are connected/expressions of one underlying atomic essence tied to the number 1 and to time?