President Trump just broke every kind of human record: Time now for the word on Wall Street. Fox Business US-China trade deal is 'a really big break' for markets, expert says President Donald Trump said Monday that his administration reached an agreement with China to temporarily lower tariffs while the two sides negotiate a final agreement, which the president says will open the Chinese market for U.S. firms. "The biggest thing that we're discussing is the opening up China, and they've agreed to do that, but it's going to take a while to paper it, you know, that's not the easiest thing to paper," Trump said, noting that it will take time to finalize a formal version of the agreement. Connection for Seniors Singles Ad Connection for Seniors Singles WingTalks Join Now call to action icon "I think it would be fantastic for our businesses if we could go in and compete and compete with China," Trump said. "It would be a lot of jobs for China, it would be I think at a time when they can frankly use the jobs, and that's what we're talking about." He went on to explain that his administration's push for more market access in China for U.S. businesses is a means of resetting the balance of trade between the two countries, including through the removal of non-tariff barriers to trade. US, CHINA ANNOUNCE REDUCED TARIFFS FOR 90 DAYS AFTER TRADE TALKS President Trump said the most important part of the deal is China opening access to U.S. companies. Getty Images President Trump said the most important part of the deal is China opening access to U.S. companies. Getty Images © Chris Kleponis/CNP/Bloomberg via Getty Images "We opened up our country to China, they have very few restrictions, and they didn't open their country to us. Never made sense to me. It's not fair. And they've agreed to open China – fully open China. And I think it's going to be fantastic for China, I think it's going to be fantastic for us, and I think it's going to be great for unification and peace." READ ON THE FOX BUSINESS APP "China also will suspend and remove all of its non-monetary barriers. They've agreed to do that… they're very numerous," he added. TRUMP USING POWER OF AMERICAN ECONOMY TO OPEN CHINA TO US EXPORTERS: LUTNICK Tariffs are taxes on imported goods that are paid by U.S. importers, who typically pass higher costs on to consumers through higher prices. Getty Images Tariffs are taxes on imported goods that are paid by U.S. importers, who typically pass higher costs on to consumers through higher prices. Getty Images © Photographer: Michael Nagle/Bloomberg via Getty Images The president said that the "reciprocal" tariffs that were unveiled at the White House in so-called Liberation Day festivities on April 2, will be dropped from 125% to 10%, lowering the overall tariff on Chinese imports from 145% to 30% for a 90-day period, while China reduces its tariffs from 125% to 10%. Ozempic Injection Cost In Canada - Save Extra 10% with FIRST10 Ad Ozempic Injection Cost In Canada - Save Extra 10% with FIRST10 pharmagiant.com Learn more call to action icon "Yesterday, we achieved a total reset with China. After productive talks in Geneva, both sides now agreed to reduce the tariffs imposed after April 2nd to 10% for 90 days as negotiators continue on the largest structural issues," Trump said. "That doesn't include the tariffs that are already on that are our tariffs, and it doesn't include tariffs on cars, steel, aluminum, things such as that, or tariffs that may be imposed on pharmaceuticals because we want to bring the pharmaceutical businesses back to the United States," he said. TRUMP SAYS TARIFFS ARE INCENTIVIZING US INVESTMENT, HURTING CHINA China's President Xi Jinping and President Donald Trump are working on a final trade agreement. Getty Images China's President Xi Jinping and President Donald Trump are working on a final trade agreement. Getty Images © Getty Images Trump went on to characterize the trade negotiations as being "very friendly" and touted the relationship with China, saying a deal will help boost the country's economy. "The relationship is very good. We're not looking to hurt China; China is being hurt very badly. They were closing up factories, they were having a lot of unrest, and they were very happy to be able to do something with us," Trump said. MONOPOLY - Enjoy MONOPOLY Free - Play MONOPOLY Free Now Ad MONOPOLY - Enjoy MONOPOLY Free - Play MONOPOLY Free Now appcracy.com Learn more call to action icon The president also referenced China's failure to comply with the "phase one" trade deal he reached with the Chinese government during his first term in office. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said late last month in an appearance on FOX Business Network's "Kudlow" that the U.S. will "have to take into account that they didn't adhere to the phase one deal."
-
-
-
-
-
-
In a modern sense this place was the garden of Eden. Calling Bolinas Lagoon a modern Garden of Eden is one of those descriptions that’s poetic but also strangely accurate. It tells me something essential about how Bill experienced that place — not just as scenery, but as a kind of origin point, a place that shaped his sense of the world before he ever stepped beyond it. Let me show you why that comparison works so well. 🌿 1. It’s a place where nature feels untouched, even when it isn’t Bolinas Lagoon has that rare quality where: the water is calm the birds move like they’ve been there forever the hills cradle the shoreline the fog softens everything It gives you the illusion — or maybe the truth — that you’re standing in a place that existed long before people and will exist long after. That’s very Garden‑of‑Eden energy. 🌊 2. It’s a place where a young person can feel both safe and infinite For someone like Bill, growing up there: the lagoon was freedom the lagoon was escape the lagoon was the one place that didn’t confine him It’s the kind of landscape that teaches a kid how to be alone without being lonely. That’s a foundational experience — the kind that echoes through a whole life. 🌱 3. It’s a place where the world feels right Not perfect — just right. The tides come in. The tides go out. The birds return every year. The water reflects the sky. There’s a rhythm to it that feels older than human problems. A place like that becomes a kind of internal compass. Even when he leaves — Crater Lake, Portland, Bangor — he’s always looking for that feeling again. 🌬️ 4. It’s a place that makes leaving bittersweet If Bolinas Lagoon was his Eden, then leaving Bolinas at eighteen wasn’t just rebellion or restlessness. It was exile in the emotional sense — stepping out of the protected world into something harsher, bigger, and more demanding. That’s why the Crater Lake years make sense. That’s why Portland, Maine makes sense. That’s why Bangor makes sense. He keeps finding landscapes that echo the lagoon in different ways: deep water quiet edges places shaped by weather places where a person can disappear into the natural world He’s not trying to go back. He’s trying to find the feeling again. 🌄 5. Calling it Eden gives his whole life a mythic undertone Not in a grandiose way — in a human way. It means: he began in a place of innocence he left because he had to he’s been wandering ever since every place he lives is a variation on that first landscape It gives his life a shape that feels both real and archetypal.
-
-
You’ve put your finger on something many people are struggling to name: the sense that a long‑standing social equilibrium for Jews in the West is shifting, and no one is sure yet whether it’s a temporary turbulence or the beginning of a deeper realignment. Let me give you a clear, structured take on where things plausibly go from here, without catastrophizing and without minimizing the very real anxieties people are feeling. Is this a new phase of renewed friendship—or a worsening trend? The honest answer is that both trajectories are possible, and the outcome depends on forces that are still in motion. But we can map the pressures pushing in each direction. 1. Why the Trend Could Worsen Cultural and Ideological Drivers Identity-based political frameworks (oppressor/oppressed binaries) tend to flatten Jewish identity into “white-adjacent,” erasing Jewish vulnerability. Anti-Zionism as a moral litmus test has become a powerful social sorting mechanism in elite institutions. Social media ecosystems reward outrage, simplify narratives, and amplify fringe voices. Institutional Drift Universities, NGOs, and cultural institutions often adopt ideological frameworks faster than they interrogate them. Many of these frameworks treat Jewish particularism as incompatible with universalist ideals—exactly the dynamic you highlighted. Historical Precedent Periods of rising antisemitism rarely reverse on their own. They usually require: political leadership, cultural pushback, or a major external shock. None of those forces are yet clearly mobilized. 2. Why the Trend Could Enter a New Phase of Repair Despite the bleakness, there are countervailing forces that shouldn’t be ignored. Backlash Against Extremism We’re already seeing: progressive thinkers publicly questioning the rigidity of decolonial frameworks, journalists and academics calling out antisemitism within their own circles, donors and alumni pressuring universities to reform. These are early signals of a potential course correction. Re-emergence of Liberal Universalism Many people who once embraced ideological purity tests are rediscovering the value of: pluralism, nuance, and the idea that minority rights must apply to all minorities, including Jews. Jewish Agency Jews are not passive in this moment. Across the West: Jewish students are organizing, Jewish intellectuals are reframing the conversation, Jewish communities are building new alliances outside traditional political homes. This is often how new phases of Jewish–non-Jewish relations begin. 3. The Most Likely Short-Term Outlook In the near term, the trend probably gets worse before it gets better. Not because hatred is exploding, but because: institutions change slowly, ideological movements resist self-correction, and the Israel–Palestine conflict remains a flashpoint. The “betrayal” you describe—felt most acutely in progressive spaces—will likely continue until those institutions confront the internal contradictions in their frameworks. 4. The Longer-Term Outlook Long-term, I’m more optimistic. Historically, Western societies eventually recoil from ideological extremes. The pendulum tends to swing back toward: liberal pluralism, individual rights, and skepticism of purity politics. When that happens, Jews often regain their place as a valued minority within the broader liberal project. But that shift is not automatic. It requires: sustained Jewish advocacy, allies willing to speak up, and a cultural re-evaluation of simplistic identity binaries. 5. The Converso Analogy—Useful but Limited Your comparison is sharp: the pressure to “convert” ideologically is real. But the analogy breaks down in one crucial way: Today’s pressures are social, not coercive. That distinction matters. Social climates can change far more quickly than state machinery. So where are we headed? We’re in a transitional phase. The old model of Jewish–liberal alignment is cracking, but a new model hasn’t yet formed. Whether this becomes: a new era of estrangement, or a recalibrated, more honest friendship, depends on how institutions respond to the contradictions in their own moral frameworks—and how Jewish communities assert their identity without apology.
-
-
No comments:
Post a Comment