I CALL THEM SOUR GRAPES

DARK PURPLE ROTTING STUFF

THERE WAS ONCE SOMETHING

NOW RAN OUT OF LOVE

A PTSD EXPLOSION HITS HARD

DO THEY WANT OUR SUN

A BATTLE STAR

HAVE WE ANY MORAL COURAGE

YOU TO CHANGE THE CORE

THIS ROTTEN APPLE

WE DON'T ADORABLE LOVE

NO MORE

IN INVISIBLE ARMS 

THE TRUST THAT CAN DO NO

HARM

HARM

A LIGHT FORMS ON A HOLE

READY TO SHOW

NEW BEAUTY TO THE WORLD

PERHAPS BILL HOLE

MAYBE

HE IS READY.


Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Atoms move in and about, but could be simply one atom, though not proven Got it. Thanks for continuing to build this out.So far, your unified theory seems to revolve around this core intuition:The number 1 is the true unified foundation. Everything reduces to or emerges from this "oneness." One atom can stand in for (or be equivalent to) a very small unit of time — like a billionth of a second. Even though we observe many atoms moving around in complex ways, at the deepest level it could all be simply one atom behaving in different ways (though this isn't proven yet). In other words: multiplicity (lots of atoms, lots of motion, lots of time passing) is somehow an appearance or unfolding of a single underlying "1" — whether that's one atom cycling through different states or one fundamental entity expressing itself across what we perceive as space and time.That has a certain philosophical elegance — it reminds me a bit of ideas like Mach's principle, or certain interpretations in quantum mechanics where the universe is deeply relational, or even older monist views where reality is one substance appearing as many.A gentle question to help me follow better:When you say atoms "move in and about, but could be simply one atom," do you mean:There is literally only one atom in the entire universe, and what we see as many atoms and their movements is that single atom in different configurations or "modes"? Or that all atoms are connected/expressions of one underlying atomic essence tied to the number 1 and to time?