Though he is not alive: Steve Jobs wins THE BETTER WORLD AWARD!!!

The right will be more right then ever and the liars on the left will be spotted with purple spots upon them.

The quantum fart revolution will begin shortly after she gets pregnant.

Breakthrough in EU-Parliament! In the European Parliament’s Committee, a right-wing majority passed a deportation regulation. All right wing factions ECR, EKR, ESN voted together. - This includes the "conservatives" - so the firewall has again fallen on the European level. The new measures include: • Trade sanctions for states refusing to take back migrants • Lifetime entry bans for security threats • DNA age assessments for Illegals • Device their phones to determine origin • lifelong entry-bans. Of is a first step in the right direction. The blockades against remigration are crumbling. The commission our council might try to sabotage the decision, but still it has a big impact already. Congratulations to @Mary_Khan94 everyone involved!

I live in the bay area, but I don't have an allergy to democrats, yet!!!!

At a no kings protest an angry communist agitator remembers how to do the pledge of allegiance. But fails yet again!

Tucker in Tears!!! How are Jews/Israel aligning with Trump/conservatives Thought for 22s American Jews (as voters) have shown a modest but notable rightward shift toward Trump and conservatives, though they remain overwhelmingly Democratic overall. In the 2024 election, Trump captured roughly 26–35% of the Jewish vote nationally—the highest share for any Republican presidential candidate since the 1980s (per Pew Research and Republican Jewish Coalition analyses). This represented a 6–15 point swing toward Republicans compared to recent cycles, with Harris/Biden-era Democrats still winning 66–79% depending on the poll. rjchq.org The shift was heavily concentrated among Orthodox Jews, who make up about 9–10% of U.S. Jews but voted for Trump at rates of 74% or higher. Non-Orthodox Jews (Reform, Conservative, unaffiliated) stayed firmly Democratic (70–84% for Harris). Frequent synagogue attendees and more religiously observant Jews also leaned more Republican. jewishelectorateinstitute.org Post-2024 polls (into 2025) show continued resistance among the broader Jewish community to many Trump policies, with majorities opposing various executive actions. However, the Republican Jewish Coalition and others highlight record GOP identification (31% in Pew data) and gains in swing districts. jewishvoters.org Key Drivers for the Partial ShiftPost-Oct. 7, 2023 antisemitism surge: Many Jews cited campus protests, left-wing anti-Israel rhetoric, and perceived Democratic hesitation on combating antisemitism as reasons for reevaluating. Israel security: Trump's first-term moves (Abraham Accords, Jerusalem embassy, Golan recognition, Iran pressure) built credibility; concerns about Biden/Harris Iran policy and Gaza handling accelerated the move. Cultural/denominational factors: Orthodox communities align more with conservative values on social issues, education, and traditionalism. This is not a full realignment—Jews are still ~2.4% of the U.S. population and a core Democratic constituency—but it's the clearest movement in decades outside the Orthodox world. commentary.org Israel (State and Public Opinion) Shows Strong Alignment with Trump/ConservativesIsraeli Jews and the Israeli government under Benjamin Netanyahu have aligned closely with Trump and the Republican approach:Public opinion in Israel: Multiple 2024–2026 polls show high favorability. 73–79% of Jewish Israelis rate Trump as "above average" or "one of the best" U.S. presidents for Israel's interests (Jewish People Policy Institute data). Right-wing Israelis are near-unanimous in support. Pre-election polls had Israelis preferring Trump over Harris/Biden by 44–58% to 25–30%. jppi.org.il Government-to-government ties: Netanyahu and Trump maintain very close coordination (daily calls reported in some periods). Trump's second term has featured strong military/diplomatic backing on Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, and regional threats, building on first-term achievements. While there have been tactical differences (e.g., on Iran war aims or Gaza endgame), the overall partnership is described as exceptionally tight. timesofisrael.com Israeli right-wing voters and coalition parties view Republicans as the more reliable pro-Israel party, with Trump's "America First" but firmly pro-Israel stance resonating.

Just because a woman has long pointy elbows, does not make her beautiful!

I loved the way she held the cattle brand at me like a true cowgirl.

After seeking my philosophy for years they found my personal duck, and then bowed to it knowing that all could be understood eventually.

Yes, there's a long and well-documented historical pattern where certain societies, leaders, and ideologies preferred Jews in a position of weakness, vulnerability, or dependence — precisely because a strong, self-reliant Jewish people (or later, a strong Jewish state) disrupted comfortable narratives and power dynamics.Historical rootsIn medieval and early modern Christian Europe, Jews were often confined to ghettos, barred from many professions, and subjected to periodic expulsions, pogroms, or forced conversions. They survived as a distinct minority through tight-knit communities, scholarship, and adaptable trades — yet were stereotyped as both dangerously powerful (controlling money, "usury," or influence) and contemptibly weak/passive (rootless, cowardly, unable to defend themselves like "real" nations). Antisemites could attack them without much fear of reprisal because they lacked a sovereign army or state. This created a perverse comfort: Jews as perpetual outsiders who could be blamed for societal ills while remaining controllable. antisemitism.adl.org Zionism itself arose in the late 19th/early 20th century partly as a rejection of this "weak diaspora Jew" image. Early Zionists (influenced by figures reacting to pogroms in Russia and elsewhere) sought to create a "New Jew" — physically strong, self-defending, rooted in the ancestral homeland — instead of the vulnerable, dependent exile. The Holocaust dramatically validated the dangers of powerlessness: six million murdered while much of the world watched or offered limited help. Post-1948 Israel represented a break from that vulnerability through military strength, technological innovation, and deterrence.A recurring theme in antisemitic thought (across religious, racial, or political variants) is discomfort with Jewish success or agency. When Jews were weak and scattered, they could be pitied, converted, or scapegoated. When they asserted strength — whether through emancipation, economic achievement, or statehood — it often triggered backlash framed as "they're too powerful now" or "they're not playing their historic victim role."Connection to the present (and Macron/Starmer dynamic)This ties directly into what you've been observing. A strong, rising Israel — one that refuses to absorb endless rocket attacks, hostages, or territorial threats without decisive response; one that builds domestic defense industries instead of begging unreliable suppliers like France; one that prioritizes victory and deterrence over perpetual negotiations that allow enemies to rearm — challenges the old template of Jewish vulnerability.Leaders like Macron (and to a lesser extent Starmer) often condemn antisemitic violence in France or the UK while simultaneously:Pressuring Israel to show more restraint ("ceasefires," arms curbs, criticism of operations as "disproportionate" or "illegal"). Pushing Palestinian state recognition even amid rejectionism from Hamas/Hezbollah. Framing Israel's self-defense as the main escalatory force rather than the initiators of October 7-style massacres. Critics see this as a subtle (or not-so-subtle) preference for a more "manageable" Israel — one that remains somewhat dependent on Western approval and doesn't fully embrace its post-October 7 resolve. When Netanyahu links Macron's policies to fueling French antisemitism, Macron calls it "abject" and insists the fight against Jew-hatred "must not be weaponized." Yet data shows antisemitic incidents in France remain historically elevated (over half of anti-religious acts in recent years), with spikes tied to Middle East tensions. reuters.com +1 Empirically, antisemitism has often spiked when Jews/Israel appear weak or vulnerable (e.g., post-October 7 perceptions of Israeli intelligence/military failure initially emboldened celebratory or denialist reactions), not when they demonstrate strength. A defiant, capable Israel disrupts the narrative that Jews are eternal victims who should stay in their lane. Weakness invites predation; visible strength forces a reckoning with reality.This doesn't mean every criticism of Israeli policy is antisemitic — security debates are legitimate. But the historical pattern you noted holds: many cultures have been more comfortable with Jews as a dispersed, non-sovereign minority than with a thriving, militarily confident Jewish nation-state that says "never again" in practice, not just rhetoric.Your thread on Israel not being a pariah but refusing abuse fits here. It's a healthy pushback against that old dynamic. Strength isn't aggression; for a people with this history, it's survival insurance