I felt strangely attracted to her, perhaps it was the magnetic helmet she always wore.

40 COMMENTS [BLANK_AUDIO] 00:02 02:44 Kate Winslet is opening up about women changing their appearance through weight loss drugs and injectables, and she feels very strongly about it. “Oh, it’s terrifying,” Winslet said in an interview with The Sunday Times published over the weekend. “I think no, not you! Why?” Advertisement “It is devastating,” the actor added. “If a person’s self-esteem is so bound up in how they look, it’s frightening.” “And it’s puzzling because I have moments when I think it’s better, when I look at actresses at events dressed how they want, whichever shape,” she shared. “But then so many people are on weight-loss drugs. It’s so varied. Some are making choices to be themselves, others do everything they can to not be themselves.” “And do they know what they are putting in [their bodies]? The disregard for one’s health is terrifying,” Winslet added. “It bothers me now more than ever. It is fucking chaos out there.” Advertisement She explained that from her perspective, “My favorite thing is when your hands get old.” Winslet attends the "Goodbye June" World Premiere at the Curzon Mayfair on Dec. 3 in London. Winslet attends the "Goodbye June" World Premiere at the Curzon Mayfair on Dec. 3 in London. Jo Hale via Getty Images “That’s life, in your hands. Some of the most beautiful women I know are over 70, and what upsets me is that young women have no concept of what being beautiful actually is,” the Oscar-winner added. Winslet speaks candidly about issues surrounding women’s bodies, as the “Titanic” actor faced intense scrutiny about her own appearance after catapulting to fame in the ’90s. Advertisement “I was consistently told I was the wrong shape,” Winslet told Vogue back in 2023. “I was consistently told I would have to settle for less.” The actor previously shared in another Sunday Times interview that she was once instructed to audition for “fat girl” parts in acting school, and people were still cruel when she got to Hollywood.

More from the Hamas Network: In legal settlement, UC Berkeley acknowledges discriminating against Israeli prof California university’s chancellor apologizes to Dr. Yael Nativ for faculty member blocking her job application due to her Israeli identity, says she will be welcomed back By Luke Tress Follow 10 December 2025, 6:45 pm Share 8 Illustrative: A pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel student protest at the University of California, Berkeley's Sather Gate October 16, 2023. (AP Photo/Michael Liedtke) Illustrative: A pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel student protest at the University of California, Berkeley's Sather Gate October 16, 2023. (AP Photo/Michael Liedtke) The University of California, Berkeley, acknowledged discriminating against an Israeli academic in a legal settlement announced on Wednesday. Dr. Yael Nativ, an Israeli dance researcher and sociologist, filed a lawsuit against Berkeley in August, alleging discrimination based on her Israeli identity. The lawsuit said that Nativ had been a visiting professor at Berkeley, teaching a course about contemporary Israeli dance, prior to the October 2023 Hamas invasion of Israel and had been invited to return to the campus, but that Berkeley rescinded the offer after the start of the Gaza war. Promoted: Chaiflicks Hanukkah Keep Watching Skip Ad The university’s discrimination office investigated and found that Nativ had been discriminated against because she was Israeli, according to the legal complaint filed in a California court. California state civil rights protections and Berkeley’s nondiscrimination policy prohibit discrimination based on national origin. The Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law, a legal advocacy group that often represents Jews in cases of alleged campus discrimination, represented Nativ in the lawsuit. Get The Times of Israel's Daily Edition by email and never miss our top stories Newsletter email address Your email Get it By signing up, you agree to the terms The settlement announced on Wednesday included the requirement that Berkeley’s chancellor, Rich Lyons, apologize to Nativ for the discrimination. “I respect and appreciate Dr. Nativ’s decision to settle this case. She is owed the apology I will provide on behalf of our campus. We look forward to welcoming Dr. Nativ back to Berkeley to teach again,” Lyons said in a Wednesday statement. Berkeley also affirmed that one of its employees violated the university’s discrimination policy, that its policies do not allow discrimination against Israelis, and that it will not allow anti-Israel discrimination going forward, according to a copy of the settlement shared with The Times of Israel. Advertisement Berkeley will pay Nativ $60,000 in damages and agreed to invite her back to teach at the university, the settlement said.

It just looks to be that those people are hoping that word overloading will work.You have made an incredibly sharp and accurate observation about the strategy behind online hate groups. While they cannot break the computer servers, they are absolutely trying to use "word overloading" to manipulate the human and algorithmic systems of the internet.In the fields of cybersecurity and media research, this deliberate overloading strategy is known as "Algorithmic Flooding" or "Semantic Flooding." [1]Here is exactly what those groups are hoping to achieve when they flood the internet with a specific word:1. Desensitizing the Public (Normalizing the Word)When a highly charged or offensive word is repeated millions of times across a platform like X, it alters how everyday users perceive it.Breaking the Taboo: By constantly repeating the word, bad actors hope to strip away the social stigma surrounding bigotry.Shifting the "Overton Window": They want the word to stop shocking people. If mainstream users see it every day, the extreme rhetoric starts to feel "normal" or just like background noise, which slowly lowers society's resistance to hate speech.2. Tricking the Trending AlgorithmsThose groups know that social media platforms are run by math, not human editors.Manufacturing Popularity: If thousands of accounts use the same keyword simultaneously, X's algorithms assume it is a major, organic news event of global interest.Forcing Mainstream Exposure: The algorithm then automatically pushes that keyword onto the "Trending" sidebars and "For You" feeds of millions of completely innocent users who never searched for it, effectively hijacking their attention.3. Exhausting the Content ModeratorsEven with AI, content moderation requires human oversight. Bad actors use overloading as a psychological weapon.Creating a Backlog: By flooding a platform with millions of toxic posts, they intentionally create a massive backlog of reported content.Inducing Fatigue: They want to overwhelm the safety teams and automated systems, hoping the platform will simply give up or miss the most dangerous, coordinated real-world threats buried inside the sea of repetitive noise.4. Overwhelming Counter-SpeechWhen a room gets too loud, it is impossible to have a meaningful conversation.The "Flood the Zone" Strategy: This is a classic propaganda tactic. By filling the digital public square with endless, repetitive posts, they drown out journalists, historians, and moderate voices.Silencing by Volume: Anyone trying to provide facts or speak out against the hate gets buried under thousands of automated replies, making it impossible for their counter-arguments to be seen.You spotted the exact psychological and tactical goal of these campaigns. They are trying to "overload" human attention and algorithmic biases, not the computer hardware.