In an unexpected moment China and the US make a turkey exchange.

This is a good sign that dust can fly off and melt into the sun, so that another day, with big smiles will arrive.

Belgian PM says he would ingnore Netanyahu ICC arrest warrant, cites 'realpolitik' "I don't think there is a single European country that would arrest Netanyahu if he were on its territory, " he continued. By MATHILDA HELLER APRIL 7, 2025 18:12 Updated: APRIL 7, 2025 18:14 Email Twitter Facebook fb-messenger (L-R) Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever over a backdrop of the ICC. (photo credit: Canva, PIROSCHKA VAN DE WOUW/REUTERS, REUTERS/SARAH MEYSSONNIER, Yair Sagi/POOL) (L-R) Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever over a backdrop of the ICC. (photo credit: Canva, PIROSCHKA VAN DE WOUW/REUTERS, REUTERS/SARAH MEYSSONNIER, Yair Sagi/POOL) Belgium would not arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu despite an International Criminal Court arrest warrant against him, Belgian Prime Minister Bard De Wever told Flemish-language broadcaster VRT on Thursday. His comments came on the same day as Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orban announced that his country was withdrawing from the ICC because it had become "too political.” Orban's statements coincided with Netanyahu's visit to Hungary. De Wever told VRT that he understood why Hungary did not arrest Netanyahu, adding “I don’t think we would do that either, to be completely honest.” JPost Videos Enlarged Prostate Has Nothing To Do With Age: Just Stop Doing This One Common Thing Enlarged Prostate Has Nothing To Do With Age: Just Stop Doing This One Common Thing Sponsored by Natural Healthy Way Cardiologists: Teaspoon On an Empty Stomach Slims Waist from 36 To 22 Cardiologists: Teaspoon On an Empty Stomach Slims Waist from 36 To 22 Sponsored by nomorfat.com Cut Your Auto Insurance Costs: Find Out How Inside Cut Your Auto Insurance Costs: Find Out How Inside Sponsored by carinsurance4less.co "I don't think there is a single European country that would arrest Netanyahu if he were on its territory, " he continued. "France, for example, wouldn't do that, I don't think we would either.”

There is nothing to fear, Bill Hole is near, hungry for anything and on a gray hound bus with his eyes fixed on a mountain. You know you love him.

So what is the magic of the Jews: Miracles, probably from God, and wanting to help the bad guys get well.

Go away from woke: The media won’t tell you, and woke liberals are clueless: Trump’s roaring comeback is driven by everyday Americans fed up with soaring bills, not obsessed about a dozen genders or the right to a transgender bathroom.

For the whiney liberal brats: Here are five ways to spank someone, assuming this is in a consensual, playful, or disciplinary context: Over-the-Knee (OTK): The person being spanked lies across the spanker’s lap, typically with their hips raised for a comfortable angle. It’s a classic position that allows for control and precision. Hand Spanking: Using an open palm to deliver a smack to the buttocks. It’s direct, simple, and lets the spanker adjust force based on reaction. With a Paddle: A flat tool, like a wooden or leather paddle, is used instead of a hand. This can intensify the sensation and covers a larger area. Bent Over a Surface: The person leans over a table, chair, or bed, keeping their legs straight or slightly bent. It’s a stable position that can make the spanking feel more formal. Standing Position: The person stands upright, perhaps holding onto something for balance, while the spanker delivers strikes from behind. It’s less common but works for quick or spontaneous moments. Let me know if you’d like more details!

When people think about becoming chickens they should reconsider.

You’re right—protests and violence tend to leave a messy mark on history, often remembered more for their chaos than their causes. Looking at the current wave as of April 6, 2025, especially the anti-Trump and anti-Musk "Hands Off!" rallies across the U.S. and beyond, it’s a mixed bag. Over 1,400 protests hit all 50 states yesterday, with crowds in the hundreds of thousands decrying everything from tariffs to Elon’s influence. Mostly peaceful, sure—organized by groups like Indivisible and MoveOn, pushing a pro-democracy line—but the historical lens won’t miss the violent edges. Take the Tesla angle. Since Musk tied himself to Trump’s administration, Tesla’s been a lightning rod. Peaceful "Tesla Takedown" demos have popped up globally, with 253 cities joining in on March 28. But then you’ve got the uglier stuff: Molotov cocktails in Colorado, arson near Boston, shots fired in Oregon. Trump’s calling it "domestic terrorism," and financial officials are fretting over economic fallout—over two dozen of them wrote to AG Pam Bondi about trashed dealerships tanking public pensions. X posts are buzzing with outrage over burned Cybertrucks and shattered windows, painting a picture of lawlessness that’ll stick in the record. History’s seen this before. The 2020 BLM protests—dozens dead, $2 billion in damages—still loom large, a benchmark for when unrest tips into destruction. Go back further: the 1968 DNC riots, Kent State in 1970—moments where violence overshadowed the message. Today’s unrest, tied to tariffs, democracy fears, or Musk’s DOGE cuts, risks the same fate. The Serbian rally last month—325,000 strong over a rail collapse—stayed mostly civil, but contrast that with Haiti’s gang-fueled marches or Nepal’s pro-monarchy clashes, and the line blurs fast. The record won’t be kind if violence defines it. Peaceful marches might get a footnote for scale—1,000+ cities dwarfing past U.S. protests—but historians will zoom in on the fire and blood. Economic ripples, like tariff-driven inflation or Tesla’s stock swings (down 12% in a day last month), will pad the narrative. Sentiment on X leans hard into the chaos—people see property torched and roads blocked, not nuanced grievances. If this keeps escalating, especially with retaliation abroad, it’ll be filed under "disorder" more than "dissent." What do you think—will the why get buried under the how?

Here is some Tariff Sanity: In short, there are tentative positive signs—potential manufacturing gains and market optimism around moderated policies—but they’re tempered by risks of higher costs, retaliation, and inflation. The full picture will take months, if not years, to clarify as data accumulates and global responses unfold. Spending and Budgeting: Costs for essentials—groceries, gas, housing materials—might climb with tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China. Trim discretionary spending now and stock up on non-perishables or big-ticket items before price tags adjust upward. If you’re in a trade-exposed job (e.g., agriculture facing retaliation), build a bigger cash buffer. Long-Term Moves: Retirement accounts (401(k), IRA) should stay steady—keep contributing, especially if your employer matches. Lean toward U.S.-focused equity funds if you buy the tariff-growth narrative, but balance with bonds or international diversification to hedge trade war risks. Real estate? It’s tricky—housing starts are softening (NAHB index at 42), but domestic production shifts could boost certain regions. If you’re buying, look at industrial hubs like the Rust Belt. Key mindset: Stay flexible. Tariffs are reshaping trade flows, and retaliation could shift the board again. Monitor your portfolio monthly, not daily, to avoid knee-jerk moves. If you’re unsure, a fee-only financial advisor can tailor this to your specifics—$200-300 for a consult beats guessing blind. No one-size-fits-all here; it’s about balancing inflation defense with growth potential in a choppy economy. What’s your risk comfort level? That’ll sharpen the focus.

Do you people prefer Biden inflation?