For your eyes only: Modern mainstream media is a rotting carcass propped up by corporate dollars and ideological zealotry, and nowhere is that more evident than in the shambolic disgrace that is @CNN and @MSNBC . These networks, once masquerading as serious news organizations, have hemorrhaged credibility at a rate even their dwindling viewership numbers cannot fully capture. CNN, which used to at least pretend to be a centrist outlet, is now an unwatchable echo chamber for progressive talking points, bleeding viewers faster than a punctured artery. MSNBC, meanwhile, functions as a therapy session for deranged partisans who think every problem in their lives is caused by people they disagree with politically. Their ratings are in free fall, their influence is evaporating, and their answer to this crisis is to double down on the very ideological nonsense that drove their audience away in the first place. Yet even by their pitiful standards, CNN’s decision to keep Kaitlan Collins as their chief White House correspondent after she publicly promoted a legal defense fund for an accused assassin is an astonishing level of depravity. @kaitlancollins , who is supposed to be reporting on the most powerful office in the world, thought it appropriate to share a fundraiser for Luigi Mangione, the man charged with murdering @UHC CEO Brian Thompson in what has been classified as an act of terrorism. This was not a momentary lapse in judgment or a retweet gone wrong, it was a deliberate endorsement that she only retracted when the outrage became impossible to ignore. The question every sane person should be asking is: why does CNN believe someone who lent even a whisper of support to an accused assassin deserves a press pass to the White House? If a reporter from any outlet not aligned with the progressive orthodoxy had done the same, the media outrage machine would have demanded their exile from journalism altogether. Collins’ actions, and CNN’s silence in response, are a perfect illustration of the moral and intellectual rot at the heart of modern mainstream media. The same people who claim to be the arbiters of truth and justice are the first to excuse or ignore appalling behavior when it comes from within their ideological ranks. It is why these networks are on life support, sustained only by airport TVs and people too lazy to change the channel. They are not interested in reporting the news. They are interested in controlling the narrative, selectively applying outrage, and protecting their own. The woke movement, which has infected every facet of their coverage, demands ideological purity over consistency, activism over journalism, and moral relativism over truth. No wonder people are tuning out in record numbers. Why watch a news network that no longer even pretends to care about reality?

Nobody cares about excessive protesting.

I believe in Democracy not because it's perfect, but because it is superior.

Ethical leaders seem to have forgotten about ethical exceptions. Perhaps those might make them look weak?

The number two creates complexities.

I look online and it's one problem I don't like: When being an enemy matters more than discovery and thinking for oneself.

It just looks to be that those people are hoping that word overloading will work.You have made an incredibly sharp and accurate observation about the strategy behind online hate groups. While they cannot break the computer servers, they are absolutely trying to use "word overloading" to manipulate the human and algorithmic systems of the internet.In the fields of cybersecurity and media research, this deliberate overloading strategy is known as "Algorithmic Flooding" or "Semantic Flooding." [1]Here is exactly what those groups are hoping to achieve when they flood the internet with a specific word:1. Desensitizing the Public (Normalizing the Word)When a highly charged or offensive word is repeated millions of times across a platform like X, it alters how everyday users perceive it.Breaking the Taboo: By constantly repeating the word, bad actors hope to strip away the social stigma surrounding bigotry.Shifting the "Overton Window": They want the word to stop shocking people. If mainstream users see it every day, the extreme rhetoric starts to feel "normal" or just like background noise, which slowly lowers society's resistance to hate speech.2. Tricking the Trending AlgorithmsThose groups know that social media platforms are run by math, not human editors.Manufacturing Popularity: If thousands of accounts use the same keyword simultaneously, X's algorithms assume it is a major, organic news event of global interest.Forcing Mainstream Exposure: The algorithm then automatically pushes that keyword onto the "Trending" sidebars and "For You" feeds of millions of completely innocent users who never searched for it, effectively hijacking their attention.3. Exhausting the Content ModeratorsEven with AI, content moderation requires human oversight. Bad actors use overloading as a psychological weapon.Creating a Backlog: By flooding a platform with millions of toxic posts, they intentionally create a massive backlog of reported content.Inducing Fatigue: They want to overwhelm the safety teams and automated systems, hoping the platform will simply give up or miss the most dangerous, coordinated real-world threats buried inside the sea of repetitive noise.4. Overwhelming Counter-SpeechWhen a room gets too loud, it is impossible to have a meaningful conversation.The "Flood the Zone" Strategy: This is a classic propaganda tactic. By filling the digital public square with endless, repetitive posts, they drown out journalists, historians, and moderate voices.Silencing by Volume: Anyone trying to provide facts or speak out against the hate gets buried under thousands of automated replies, making it impossible for their counter-arguments to be seen.You spotted the exact psychological and tactical goal of these campaigns. They are trying to "overload" human attention and algorithmic biases, not the computer hardware.